Says who?Could just rotate them a couple of games each for the rest of the year and still compete, they won’t last 7 games in a row
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Says who?Could just rotate them a couple of games each for the rest of the year and still compete, they won’t last 7 games in a row
This is what I thought. If he didn't stuff himself up we probably get a penalty. Hurting your self always makes it look so much more accidental/incidental and I thoroughly believe it influences the decisionNRL Physio is reporting Salmon broke his jaw and is out for 4 - 5 weeks.
We were never getting a pen while he was spitting blood and teeth everywhere
Bulldogs fans love the non call though and are calling us the biggest whinging fanbase in the compThe fact that the late hit to TMM was not even a penalty is embarrassing to the game itself.
Rts is binned for a moderate lifting tackle.
Cht binned for dropping a ball on someone’s head
Liam Martin binned for rubbing someone’s head
But salmon isn’t even penalised for flying out of the line, hitting TMM late AND in the head, consequently breaking his jaw in two places.
The game has turned into a fucking joke & the inconsistencies of referring is to blame. Even the greats of the game have had enough.
Bulldogs fans love the non call though and are calling us the biggest whinging fanbase in the comp
Could be right here. I recall DCE last night electing to kickoff first.Just stepping to the side a bit, I have a theory that it's always better to kick off (first) in golden point. Often the receiving team starts their set on 10-15m and can't get out of their half. Unless they put in a reslly great kick and chase on the 5th the second team will likely start their set on the 20-25m and might have first real opportunity to take an FG attempt.
This happened on both kick offs today where the kicking off team started their sets further up the field than the receiving team did.
The Warriors are the only team that seems to get penalised when the bunker retrospectively puts a player on report 1, 2 or even 3 tackles later. It never happens in any other game.
Also this was the exact thing webby was praised for on here last year, not giving the boys excuses and not to leave it in the refs hands, building resilience etc. Funny how fast people change opinions especially when coaching from their keyboards. Can probably pull similar comments praising our halves from the last couple of wins and not wanting sj anywhere near the team.Watching it I kinda felt the same way initially, but then I think what would it achieve really? Wouldn’t change the result. Wouldn’t change the reffing we get next week.
I just think he’s apathetic to it as he doesn’t want to give it energy which I’m slowly coming around to as well
A trip constitutes foul play which entitles the affected team to be awarded a penalty no? I recall Jaxon Purdue getting binned for his trip last week, all be it an attempt to deny the opposition scoring. It shouldn’t technically matter though as they are both cases of foul play…..Even happened in the same game with Kikau on report for a trip but no penalty.
There’s a reason they’re not coaches…Couldn't agree more.
I take it everyone will be screaming for CHT's head just like they were after one bad performance from SJ?
Oh wait..
Huh? The boss is immune from criticism? Must’ve missed that memoPlayers I somewhat understand but posters turning on webby really grinds my gears. I even saw a poster implying he’s not the right coach for us.
Bold of you assume posters on here haven’t already been leaders of men and arent speaking from experience..There’s a reason they’re not coaches…
Would do some of the guys with strong opinions good to go give it try with a kids team or something