Maybe preseason but crazy to do that now
Pick Your Team Bulldogs v Warriors - [Round 23, 2025]
- Thread starter mt.wellington
- Start date
NZWarriors.com
Do we have e 17 fit players?
NZWarriors.com
How’s that crazy he’s a dally m fullback. And best on ground every time he’s gone back there. We’re not winning either it’s worth a go
Bro he was literally lying on the ground injured during the last passage of play that lead to the winning try. Ref didn’t even stop the game the slimey prick
NZWarriors.com
Going against the grain but I think we can win.
And I am not drinking from the glass half full cup here.
I genuinely believe that Webster can win this game.
Saw enough of his brilliance against the Dolphins to see how that can be applied against the Dogs.
The Second phase ambush was very clever - I said Webster could pull the trigger in the lead up, few probably took that seriously (It came to me on game day that we wouldn't get out of our thirty without Props and that Webster would know this, his whole Webster ball starts with leg speed through Prop forwards).
Against the Dogs Webster knows that we have to have a conventional boring Webster ball platform. It is what the Dogs do not like - in the same fashion the Phins do not like second phase and ball movement.
But here is where Webster has a conundrum, with all our experience missing, the Dogs are gonna win a marathon tennis rally in the end.
So he has the options of either bringing in the offload again (Risky because that is what the Penrith model likes, you take the risks they cash in - and actually the Riff didn't invent it, Bellamy did).
So in essence, Webster will play our ball retention game, and when we cannot get out of our end he will use ball movement to run the ball for yardage on our wing three quarter line.
And after half time if we are in a tight contest he will persist with the safety ball. If we trail the second phase will be used, or if we lack for meters, this is how second phase is meant to be used in a Warriors context, not willy nilly from the kick off.
With Webster, if you are gonna use offloads there has to be a purpose, exactly how it should be.
And for all you critics and cynics, in case you missed it this weekend, Webster is well capable of starting a game with one plan and adapting it to the situation in that same game.
A lot of shit that gets posted about him is just rubbish.
And I am not drinking from the glass half full cup here.
I genuinely believe that Webster can win this game.
Saw enough of his brilliance against the Dolphins to see how that can be applied against the Dogs.
The Second phase ambush was very clever - I said Webster could pull the trigger in the lead up, few probably took that seriously (It came to me on game day that we wouldn't get out of our thirty without Props and that Webster would know this, his whole Webster ball starts with leg speed through Prop forwards).
Against the Dogs Webster knows that we have to have a conventional boring Webster ball platform. It is what the Dogs do not like - in the same fashion the Phins do not like second phase and ball movement.
But here is where Webster has a conundrum, with all our experience missing, the Dogs are gonna win a marathon tennis rally in the end.
So he has the options of either bringing in the offload again (Risky because that is what the Penrith model likes, you take the risks they cash in - and actually the Riff didn't invent it, Bellamy did).
So in essence, Webster will play our ball retention game, and when we cannot get out of our end he will use ball movement to run the ball for yardage on our wing three quarter line.
And after half time if we are in a tight contest he will persist with the safety ball. If we trail the second phase will be used, or if we lack for meters, this is how second phase is meant to be used in a Warriors context, not willy nilly from the kick off.
With Webster, if you are gonna use offloads there has to be a purpose, exactly how it should be.
And for all you critics and cynics, in case you missed it this weekend, Webster is well capable of starting a game with one plan and adapting it to the situation in that same game.
A lot of shit that gets posted about him is just rubbish.
He looked like he had pulled a groin or something earlier in the game after one of his jumps for the ball, haven't seen anything official though and no mention of him on the post game injury reports that I've seen.
Guess we'll find out on Tuesday...
NZWarriors.com
This is the game I've had circled all season, because felt we got dudded twice last season both away definitely and then at home was a bit how ya going also.
So is frustrating to have so many outs, really hope we can front up for this one.
With Egan back and Laban definitely out, potentially Leka also out. Be surprised if Vai is back. Maybe we can use Healey in a bench lock role as we did in his debut against Cows. Come on, take the odd* snipe out of dummy half in that role. Let Egan work off the back of it. EIT can play Labans role as bench 2RF.
So is frustrating to have so many outs, really hope we can front up for this one.
With Egan back and Laban definitely out, potentially Leka also out. Be surprised if Vai is back. Maybe we can use Healey in a bench lock role as we did in his debut against Cows. Come on, take the odd* snipe out of dummy half in that role. Let Egan work off the back of it. EIT can play Labans role as bench 2RF.
Last edited:
-
Nobody is reading this thread right now.
Similar threads
