Post Match Warriors v Storm - [Round 15, 2024]

Warriors vs Storm

Warriors

24 - 38

MATCH COMPLETE

Go Media Stadium

15 Jun 2024

Storm

Match Stats

Warriors Storm
4 Tries 7
4 / 5 Conversions 4 / 6
0/0 Field Goals 0/0
0/0 2P Field Goals 0/0
4 Try Assists 6
Warriors Storm
55% Possession 45%
9 / 31 Set Completion 9 / 30
61 Time in Opposition Half 39
1276 Metres Gained 1059
1 Dropouts 1
8 Dummy Half Runs 6
18 / 441 Kicks/Kick Metres 20 / 584
0 40/20 0
0 20/40 0
12 Offloads 4
0 1 on 1 Steals 1
4 Line Breaks 5
4 Line Break Assists 5
0 Support Play 0
Warriors Storm
9 / 31 Set Completion 9 / 30
8 Penalties (Conceded) 5
6 Set Restarts 0
10 Errors 11

Player Stats

# Warriors T Pts TA LB TB OFF Ta MT IT Pos DR K KM M E P
1 C. Nicoll-Klokstad 0 0 2 0 3 1 3 0 0 26 1 1 41m 154m 0 0
2 D. Watene-Zelezniak 0 0 0 0 2 1 10 1 0 11 0 0 0m 73m 2 1
3 R. Berry 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 1 0 4 0 0 0m 16m 0 0
4 A. Pompey 1 10 1 1 2 1 9 2 0 9 0 0 0m 50m 1 0
5 M. Montoya 2 8 0 2 4 0 1 4 0 10 0 0 0m 64m 1 2
6 T. Martin 0 0 1 0 2 3 19 4 0 36 0 8 125m 31m 1 1
7 S. Johnson 0 0 0 0 1 0 24 3 0 28 0 9 275m 33m 2 0
8 A. Fonua-Blake 0 0 0 0 5 2 15 0 0 15 0 0 0m 139m 0 0
9 W. Egan 0 0 0 0 1 0 25 3 0 11 7 0 0m 69m 0 1
10 J. Ford 0 0 0 0 1 0 26 2 0 19 0 0 0m 132m 1 1
11 M. Niukore 0 0 0 0 4 0 15 4 0 10 0 0 0m 93m 0 1
12 M. Barnett 1 4 0 1 6 1 22 2 0 20 0 0 0m 139m 1 0
15 D. Walker 0 0 0 0 3 1 19 4 0 11 0 0 0m 93m 0 1
13 T. Harris 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 9 0 0 0m 69m 1 0
14 C. Harris-Tavita 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 0m 10m 0 0
16 J. Tevaga 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 2 0 11 0 0 0m 73m 0 0
17 K. Capewell 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 0 4 0 0 0m 38m 0 0
20 R. Tuivasa-Sheck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0m 0m 0 0
# Storm T Pts TA LB TB OFF Ta MT IT Pos DR K KM M E P
1 S. Fa'alogo 2 8 0 2 5 0 7 0 0 15 1 0 0m 110m 2 0
2 G. Anderson 1 4 0 0 1 0 4 3 0 9 0 0 0m 39m 0 0
3 D. Ieremia 1 4 0 1 1 0 3 2 0 8 0 0 0m 40m 1 0
4 N. Meaney 1 14 0 1 1 0 14 5 0 11 0 1 33m 88m 1 0
5 X. Coates 1 4 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 19 0 0 0m 78m 2 0
6 T. Wishart 0 0 1 0 3 1 13 2 0 22 1 2 69m 52m 0 0
7 J. Hughes 0 0 4 0 3 0 17 4 0 30 0 15 454m 51m 1 0
8 T. Kamikamica 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 0 8 0 0 0m 60m 0 0
9 H. Grant 0 0 1 0 1 1 29 5 0 6 4 2 28m 18m 1 1
10 J. King 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 5 0 7 0 0 0m 72m 1 1
11 S. Blore 0 0 0 0 3 0 33 1 0 9 0 0 0m 59m 0 2
12 E. Katoa 1 4 1 1 3 0 34 5 0 12 0 0 0m 114m 0 1
13 T. Loiero 0 0 0 0 4 0 35 3 0 10 0 0 0m 70m 0 0
15 C. Welch 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 0 0 9 0 0 0m 70m 0 0
16 N. Asofa-Solomona 0 0 0 0 1 1 10 2 0 10 0 0 0m 77m 1 0
18 J. Chan 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 5 0 0 0m 23m 0 0
19 J. Howarth 0 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 0m 38m 0 0
14 B. Garlick 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0m 0m 0 0
 

Rate the game?

  • A+

    Votes: 3 2.9%
  • A

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • B

    Votes: 36 34.6%
  • C

    Votes: 52 50.0%
  • F-

    Votes: 13 12.5%

  • Total voters
    104
The ref was found guessing on a lot of calls early. 2 turning point calls: Pings Walker for markers not square, was an absolute guess. Walker tries to challenge and told he can't - watching it on replay Walker was right, he was 100% square. That ended our momentum in the first half.
The second was taking it back 2 plays to penalize TMM for an innocuous high shot. They simply don't do this to other teams - that is a Warriors fuckover special.
Yeah the penaltys for not being square at marker are an obvious ploy by the refs to give teams that are losing a leg up, it happened to Berry last week aswell.
The strangest part of the high shot was that Faalongo was no 10 minute HIA
 
NZWarriors.com
Similar to how I feel.

Many games to be won for us still and I'm still certain we will make the 8.

Just won't be doing much if we get there.

Hard not to turn back to some youth though.

MGT and Ale I would have in the 17 next week
I still think we can give the competition a fair shake. The score got away from us at the end, but I'd argue that any side with 11-12 men for extended periods against the storm are generally going to end up losing by a much larger margin. For me, there were enough signs in this game to demonstrate how dangerous we can be. If it was anyone other than Storm or Panthers, our power game in the first 20 minutes would have been enough to bury the opposition. Cows couldn't cope with it last week. I'd suggest that if we start against the titans next week in a similar fashion, we'll put many more pts on them.

Of course, the problem with our style is that it requires self discipline: we need to defend well against any penalties we concede for being too excited on defense. Our inability to defend against our ill discipline has cost us this year. We need to get better at it. Once we can manage that, we'll be hard to stop. Last week's cows game is really the only game this year where we have been able to pull it off perfectly.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
That penalty though for the late hit on Hughes. Id be embarrassed if SJ was playing for penalties like that.

We talk about it over here with players staying down to get penalties for head contact and cards, but they need to stamp this playacting and diving out of the game.
Yet Egan gets hit high in the mush by Hughes and no call despite Egan stalling the play the ball and letting the cameras catch the bloodied mouth.

If the refs (bunker) were competent then the acting would tail off..
 
We lost because both centers went off injured and both wingers got binned for dumb things. It's not the end of the world. We'll still make the eight
Most sides in this comp would have lost by 30+ pts against the Storm given a similar scenario. If our wingers hadn't lost the plot, who knows what could have happened. We were in the ascendancy again when the ref made that batshit crazy call against TMM. Still, the team demonstrated enough to suggest that we have many shots to fire before the end of the season.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Prior to him coming on they showed a stat that we'd completed at 50% in the 5 minutes before his introduction. Couple that with us conceding 10 unanswered points before him entering the game along with the Storm introducing Welch & NAS to coincide with his entry, it'd be more accurate to say your assumption has no merit whatsoever
What the score line with and without Tohu?
14-10 without

4- 22 with

nO mERit WhATsoEVer..

Bro
Tohus done. This game proved the hypothesis. Sory that hurts you personally...
 
The perfect Hollywood movie plot: lose twice in the regular season against our hoodoo team only to win against them by golden point in the grand final. The real footy was the friends we made along the way 🥲

I got called away from the game 14-0 to attend a work problem, come back after half time to all hell broken loose and 2 in the bin! Ay caramba!
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
The lack of discipline is what killed our momentum and lost this game for us.

I'm torn about this statement.

At the end of the day there were a host of things that went against us on the day.

SJ rusty
New game plan
The rain came tumbling down
Berry injured
2 sin bins
The ref

I do agree that at times we made poor decisions and there were some average errors from us, and we did seem incapable of defending in that 20 min before half time. Those things we can work on and fix, but man it's frustrating when there are several phantom penalties called against you, or not called (Wayde's high shot).

Regardless of that, I think there were some really strong moments for us and at times, we look like we could win the comp we play so well.
It's quite interesting that the last 18 months have been built on defence, yet that seems to be a bit of an issue currently, as we scored 24 points against the Storm (and put over 20 on Penny and Dolphins who are also top 4) so our attack is looking good, while defence has fallen off a bit.

It looks like we have all the ingredients to be a threat this year. I'd love us to make top 4 but imo top 6 is just as key - a home semi before meeting Storm, Sharks or Penny away. All of those teams look much more beatable this year.
 
In line with other opinions aired, the problem with the team right now is positions 2-5. Our forward pack has been doing its job. In almost all of our games this season, even the ones we've lost, we have outrun the opposition, in both total run metres and pcms. Even yesterday, we outran the storm by almost 300 metres and only 2 storm forwards made 100+ metres (Katoa and Loieiro). Conversely we had 5 (AFB, Ford, Barney, Tohu and Walker). Ford in particular has been a revelation up front. Barney and Niukore clearly add a hardness to our edges that was missing in the earlier rounds. I'd be tempted to replace Capewell with Ale/Bunty but overall I think the forward rotation is fine and one of the most versatile in the comp.

Our backs are letting this team down. I think the defensive issue is beyond just the wingers (DWZ and Montoya)'s edge defense which I agree has been suspect for a long time. Our backline is visibly much slower than many other backlines in the comp and it's starting to gets exposed on a regular basis. It concerned me last week how quickly DWZ gave up on the chase on Drinkwater last week and it happened again for the Storm's 4th try. Once the linebreak was made, none of our backs had the pace to prevent the try. The tries melbourne scored on our edges (#3, #5) was simply a case of our centres getting burned by their faster opposites (Meaney in particular).

Admittedly, this issue was exacerbated in this game by the injury to Rocco and our having to move an injured walker to replace him. Not to mention the 11-12 man issue. But the problem is something we need to address moving forward. Metcalf is really the only one in our side with top level speed and he's sitting out on the sidelines atm.

So why have the back 5 looked like world beaters at times?
 
Also Egans contact was called a head clash so can people STFU about that. Also Katoas strip on Pompey is legal as a strip is not a tackle...
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
I'm torn about this statement.

At the end of the day there were a host of things that went against us on the day.

SJ rusty
New game plan
The rain came tumbling down
Berry injured
2 sin bins
The ref

I do agree that at times we made poor decisions and there were some average errors from us, and we did seem incapable of defending in that 20 min before half time. Those things we can work on and fix, but man it's frustrating when there are several phantom penalties called against you, or not called (Wayde's high shot).

Regardless of that, I think there were some really strong moments for us and at times, we look like we could win the comp we play so well.
It's quite interesting that the last 18 months have been built on defence, yet that seems to be a bit of an issue currently, as we scored 24 points against the Storm (and put over 20 on Penny and Dolphins who are also top 4) so our attack is looking good, while defence has fallen off a bit.

It looks like we have all the ingredients to be a threat this year. I'd love us to make top 4 but imo top 6 is just as key - a home semi before meeting Storm, Sharks or Penny away. All of those teams look much more beatable this year.
I am generally one of the most optimistic posters on this thread, so I tend to agree with most of your post here. Many of the things that cost us this game were either out of our control (ref) or self-inflicted (dumbass wingers). The latter is idiosyncratic to this game. But the former is something that has been true since 1995. I think we just need to accept the fact that on average the reffing will go against us and adopt the mentality that our discipline has to be better than the average club, especially given the risks associated with our penrith-style play. It's our fault for putting ourselves in a position where the reffing can cost us the game. Blaming the refs is always the sign of a classless loser (ie ricky stuart). I appreciate Webby for never going down that route.
 
What the score line with and without Tohu?
14-10 without

4- 22 with

nO mERit WhATsoEVer..

Bro
Tohus done. This game proved the hypothesis. Sory that hurts you personally...
It doesn't change the fact that the momentum had already swung. We had conceded 10 straight points before he arrived then another 10 in a row once he entered before we returned serve.
Blind Freddy can see he's lost 2-3 yards of pace & he's in his twilight but your claim of the momentum shift coinciding with his introduction continues to be incorrect despite your best eFf0rTs to say otherwise
 
Also Egans contact was called a head clash so can people STFU about that. Also Katoas strip on Pompey is legal as a strip is not a tackle...
How about the ref call on DWZ's challenge of the high ball that Coates dropped. Went something along the lines of, " Dallin changes from challenging the high ball the to defensively playing the opposition blah blah blah".
Was he challenging? Yes
Was it a disruptor? No
Did he tackle him mid air? No

Why is it over complicated..
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
It doesn't change the fact that the momentum had already swung. We had conceded 10 straight points before he arrived then another 10 in a row once he entered before we returned serve.
Blind Freddy can see he's lost 2-3 yards of pace & he's in his twilight but your claim of the momentum shift coinciding with his introduction continues to be incorrect despite your best eFf0rTs to say otherwise
We had 90% possession for the first 20mins. It was always going to "swing".
 
How about the ref call on DWZ's challenge of the high ball that Coates dropped. Went something along the lines of, " Dallin changes from challenging the high ball the to defensively playing the opposition blah blah blah".
Was he challenging? Yes
Was it a disruptor? No
Did he tackle him mid air? No

Why is it over complicated..
Huh? Completely different scenario and set of circumstances. Of which the ref was wrong and got corrected.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
It doesn't change the fact that the momentum had already swung. We had conceded 10 straight points before he arrived then another 10 in a row once he entered before we returned serve.
Blind Freddy can see he's lost 2-3 yards of pace & he's in his twilight but your claim of the momentum shift coinciding with his introduction continues to be incorrect despite your best eFf0rTs to say otherwise
2 mins after he comes on and an instant 4 on 3 overlap as Tohu is no mans land. Try time. This was their first well constructed try.

Screenshot 2024-06-16 080342.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWC
Back
Top