every new government does this,
year 1, blame the outgoing, for why they can't do what they campaigned on
year 2, implement some rats and mice policies for their backers
year 3, campaign, vote for us this time we'll really do something if we aren't in coalition, promise.
they wouldn't've even have had time to digest all the incoming briefings and they rolled out step 1 - gormless flog that luxton.
4 year terms seem like a good idea to break that cycle up, but the main parties both being crushingly useless and terrified of upsetting the median voter, it would just probably stretch out the mediocrity. would take a very popular PM to get 4 years back to back
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			year 1, blame the outgoing, for why they can't do what they campaigned on
year 2, implement some rats and mice policies for their backers
year 3, campaign, vote for us this time we'll really do something if we aren't in coalition, promise.
they wouldn't've even have had time to digest all the incoming briefings and they rolled out step 1 - gormless flog that luxton.
4 year terms seem like a good idea to break that cycle up, but the main parties both being crushingly useless and terrified of upsetting the median voter, it would just probably stretch out the mediocrity. would take a very popular PM to get 4 years back to back
			
				Last edited: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
	
		
			
		
		
	
	
	
		
			
		
		
	
								
							
							 
 
		 
  
 
		 
 
		
 
						
					 
 
		 
 
		
 
					
				 
 
		



 
					
				 
						
					 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		