Yeah I get it . We who condemn must be punished. Webster is not responsible for injuries, players making idiotic choices or the phasees of the moon.
So good luck to those supporters who still expect a miracle after 30 years. It's great for the Warriors to have that support & blind faith.
Perhaps we could ask question though -
about how efective our assistant coaches are ?,
what is the Club's attitude to injuries & player welfare ?
why so many current fans think Andrew Webster is the answer to 30 years of drought ?.
Oh & how the hell are we supposed to perform in Vegas with all these injuries & burnt out players ?
Not having a go at anyone biut seriously concerned Warriors are being targeted as the next failure team ( no offence Tigers fans). Fans need to be supportive but also realistic. This is a big investment for sponsers, fans & the NRL . What is the long term outlook if we continue down this path. Just asking
The next failure team? As in "go bust" failure?
Mate, it's One. Bad. Season for a coach who's in his second year. Lessons were always going to be taught to us (ie this is what it's like to be taken seriously by your opposition, best use of the interchange etc etc). Injuries happen. Bad form happens.
Totally agree about the assistants. Frankly and yes, I know, New Zealand Rugby League Sacred Cow, Warriors Legend, Golden Boot Winner etc but
Stacey Jones is the first head on the block. He's said (and his lack of results back this up, although obviouly there were things out of his control) that he doesn't want to be a First Grade Coach, so there's no future in/reason to promote him and like everyone else athe Warriors, it's quite right to ask "Stacey, what do you do at the Warriors? Are you doing it well? What else can you offer?"
Do I think
Andrew Webster will saunter out of the International Terminal with the NRL Trophy in his arms one day? Hand in heart, probably not ie my house isn't going on that. But it wouldn't even if Wayne Bennett and Craig Bellamy agreed to a be a twosome at the Warriors. Too many variables.
Once again we're in one of those threads where everyone more-or-less repeats (ie they word their response differently but the jist of the post is the same) their position every few pages or so and I stated my position after the Titans "performance" in the Post Match and I see no logical reason to move from that.
Long term? The NRL put up with the Sharks taking 49 seasons to break their Premiership duck and as sceptical as I am about how truly popular the Warriors are - especially in New Zealand - I think the NRL would like to hold on to the Warriors as long as possible and maybe longer than they should (ie they'll put up with sales of/management changes in/ugly public confrontation between members of the Warriors for a while yet).