
Why some are working against public transport and rail
Opinion: A sensible transport strategy will require the courage to look beyond the commercial interests of a one-dimensional transport and infrastructure industry.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We have the negative of less tax for the government.A reminder of how economically destructive this government is, except for the wealthy of course
View attachment 11478
I’m pro public transport, particularly in our biggest cities.![]()
Why some are working against public transport and rail
Opinion: A sensible transport strategy will require the courage to look beyond the commercial interests of a one-dimensional transport and infrastructure industry.newsroom.co.nz
Melbournes was pretty good when I was there, although seemed to be a lot of outages from time to time.I’m pro public transport, particularly in our biggest cities.
Big cities end up being just huge transport systems to get people around with housing congregated around transport hubs. Transport systems are the first priority before lifestyle with trains, motorways bridges and tunnels weaving across the city. Communities are divided and open spaces used, look at Sydney with multiple transport bridges across Darling Harbour. Transport must trump all else. Massive transport systems come at an amenity cost, but that’s the cost of mega cities.
What overseas city is a good example of the transport system we should follow?
If we follow my Sydney example above, we would build a new train line plus a new motorway both underground from the CBD to Albany (train would in reality tunnel under the harbour and replace the northern bus lane from Takapuna), with the underground motorway tolled at say $15+ for use and always be free flowing.I’m pro public transport, particularly in our biggest cities.
Big cities end up being just huge transport systems to get people around with housing congregated around transport hubs. Transport systems are the first priority before lifestyle with trains, motorways bridges and tunnels weaving across the city. Communities are divided and open spaces used, look at Sydney with multiple transport bridges across Darling Harbour. Transport must trump all else. Massive transport systems come at an amenity cost, but that’s the cost of mega cities.
What overseas city is a good example of the transport system we should follow?
London is great, berlin is fantastic, Paris, many other places I've been have had fantastic systems.I’m pro public transport, particularly in our biggest cities.
Big cities end up being just huge transport systems to get people around with housing congregated around transport hubs. Transport systems are the first priority before lifestyle with trains, motorways bridges and tunnels weaving across the city. Communities are divided and open spaces used, look at Sydney with multiple transport bridges across Darling Harbour. Transport must trump all else. Massive transport systems come at an amenity cost, but that’s the cost of mega cities.
What overseas city is a good example of the transport system we should follow?
All great cities we should follow!London is great, berlin is fantastic, Paris, many other places I've been have had fantastic systems.
London underground is one of the most efficient public transport systems I’ve ever come acrossLondon is great, berlin is fantastic, Paris, many other places I've been have had fantastic systems.
London also has a population 5 times the size of Auckland to support it.London underground is one of the most efficient public transport systems I’ve ever come across
Light rail got cancelled by this National governmentLondon also has a population 5 times the size of Auckland to support it.
We have started heading down that path with the previous National government in 2016
![]()
City Rail Link (CRL) - Official site
City Rail Link (CRL), official site for NZ Government/Auckland Council underground City Rail Link project, Auckland's number one transport priority.www.cityraillink.co.nz
We also have had the bus hubs (like Oteha valley) and motorway lanes completed.
Since then we haven't had much at all added. There had been a lot of talk about light rail to the airport which stayed as talk. We did get te Huia which didn't appear to have a realistic cost/benefit put to it There seemed to have been more focus on cycle ways (think harbour bridge skyway) and slowing down traffic.
I think there is a lot of assumption that the right don't like or want pubic transport but the facts don't actually seem to support this. Any programme needs to be fundable and buildable in a rational, staged way. With the city rail link there is a good step towards an effective rail public transport option in the city.
An addendum - all cities got where they are by taking a risk, and with a lot lower populations than they have now. Build it and they will come. The problem is the lack of vision and pure shortsightedness means a lack of political will to build something that will benefit us all for 50 - 100 years, even if it takes 20 years to build.London also has a population 5 times the size of Auckland to support it.
We have started heading down that path with the previous National government in 2016
![]()
City Rail Link (CRL) - Official site
City Rail Link (CRL), official site for NZ Government/Auckland Council underground City Rail Link project, Auckland's number one transport priority.www.cityraillink.co.nz
We also have had the bus hubs (like Oteha valley) and motorway lanes completed.
Since then we haven't had much at all added. There had been a lot of talk about light rail to the airport which stayed as talk. We did get te Huia which didn't appear to have a realistic cost/benefit put to it There seemed to have been more focus on cycle ways (think harbour bridge skyway) and slowing down traffic.
I think there is a lot of assumption that the right don't like or want pubic transport but the facts don't actually seem to support this. Any programme needs to be fundable and buildable in a rational, staged way. With the city rail link there is a good step towards an effective rail public transport option in the city.
What light rail are you talking about? The one that kept getting talked about and had no money put aside for it in the budget by the previous government? At the most they cancelled a sound bite.Light rail got cancelled by this National government
The facts support powerful lobby groups behind this government pushing for policies to destroy public transport in New Zealand. Simeon Brown is an extreme ideologist of the very right.
Turns out they had to be dragged kicking and screaming - looks like they spent many years delaying it.What light rail are you talking about? The one that kept getting talked about and had no money put aside for it in the budget by the previous government? At the most they cancelled a sound bite.
The city rail loop is a very good step towards what people have mentioned above about an efficient PT network like London or some Australian cities. That was put in place by a right government.
Who was in government, produced the funding and got it underway? That's the bottom line.Turns out they had to be dragged kicking and screaming - looks like they spent many years delaying it.
Typical right, claiming credit for progressive outcomes eh Inruin? Oh and
![]()
Greens launch Auckland rail link campaign
The Green Party has launched a campaign to try to get Aucklanders to change the Government's mind about building a rail loop in downtown Auckland.www.rnz.co.nz
![]()
Govt backs Auckland's city rail link
Prime Minister John Key has confirmed that Government will back a city rail loop in Auckland, but will delay the start of construction by five years.nzherald.co.nz
![]()
Greens push Auckland rail project
The Green Party is attempting to raise public awareness about Auckland's proposed underground rail loop with the launch of a Fast Track campaign on Monday.www.rnz.co.nz
Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
The light rail that didn't happen. That Auckland needs. National cancelled it as it was about to start, should have started years before.Who was in government, produced the funding and got it underway? That's the bottom line.
Seems like an inconvenient truth to your claims the right don't like PT.
And I'll ask again, what light rail are you talking about that got cancelled?
And you know full well the road lobby dominate the right parties in nz.Who was in government, produced the funding and got it underway? That's the bottom line.
Seems like an inconvenient truth to your claims the right don't like PT.
And I'll ask again, what light rail are you talking about that got cancelled?
To clarify, are tax cuts to be tax neutral, fund our operating deficit on everyday stuff or for long term capital upgrades?A portion of the money that this government is borrowing for tax cuts would have easily paid for infrastructure that would last nz 100 years.