Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think Chris Hipkins will be Labour leader in the lead up to the next election. If Labour is smart, that isAn interesting stat 65 years since a PM has lost an election and stayed on in opposition to get voted back in.
As we have seen a lot of politicians not just Prime Ministers once they get voted out move on. The opposition parties also tend to change leaders a lot and a lot of former leaders move on instead of working their way back up.
We had a period with John Key and Jacinda Ardern where it seemed the leader was more popular than their party. At the moment both leaders aren't setting the world on fire with the polls. Is it flipped to people favouring the political party more than the leader?
Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
Who would be the leading candidate(s) to replace him?I don't think Chris Hipkins will be Labour leader in the lead up to the next election. If Labour is smart, that is
The rising cost of services like health, which has jumped from costing about $20 billion in the 2020/21 year to nearly $30b (about $6000 per citizen) in the current year despite long wait times and lower services.Seymour going to make a speech today about ideas for privatisation.
This should be the basis financial debate and investigation but it won't.
I admire Seymour for raising issues we need to address if we are to maintain anything like our living standards for the next 50 years.
Kieran McAualty (spelling might be off)Who would be the leading candidate(s) to replace him?
Would this start the process like American health system. At first it's fine but then the insurance gets more expensive and your 6k isn't enough then, government slash funding, you get less than 6k and insurance goes up even more.option to give up their right to the public healthcare system and take their $6000 for their own private insurance
To be clear I support public health and education. Also the health system deals with chronic health issues that private wouldn’t cover, etc.Would this start the process like American health system. At first it's fine but then the insurance gets more expensive and your 6k isn't enough then, government slash funding, you get less than 6k and insurance goes up even more.
I'm just asking, I actually don't know much about this subject, but wouldn't a lot of that cost be associated with building new hospitals and with inflation all of that goes up just like rail.However budgets have been increasing massively (health $20b to $30b in 4 years)
Many of our hospital buildings are at or near the end of their life. Lots of money spent on catch up maintenance when we need new hospitals.I'm just asking, I actually don't know much about this subject, but wouldn't a lot of that cost be associated with building new hospitals and with inflation all of that goes up just like rail.
There are graduates that can't get a job because hospitals don't have enough funding to hire them. I was at the ER and it took about 4 hrs to get a bed. When I got up there, there were like at least 4 empty beds. I assume that there weren't enough nurses to be able to cover all the beds adequately.
Would probably be closer to us here in Aus where you get the best of both worldsWould this start the process like American health system. At first it's fine but then the insurance gets more expensive and your 6k isn't enough then, government slash funding, you get less than 6k and insurance goes up even more.
They govt gives you money for private health insurance on top of medicare?Would probably be closer to us here in Aus where you get the best of both worlds
They govt gives you money for private health insurance on top of medicare?
Privatization is the problem not any kind of solution. It's enriching the wealthy at the expense of everyone elseSeymour going to make a speech today about ideas for privatisation.
This should be the basis financial debate and investigation but it won't.
I admire Seymour for raising issues we need to address if we are to maintain anything like our living standards for the next 50 years.
Where privatization worked really well was when we had private Building Consultants who were able to process building consents, undertake inspections and instruct Council's to issue CCC's. As someone who deals regularly with Council's obtaining building consents for over thirty years, when firms like PBC and Compass Building Certifiers were about, council's no longer had a "captive" audience and not only improved their customer service but also kept their fees down.Privatization is the problem not any kind of solution. It's enriching the wealthy at the expense of everyone else
The only way to do it. Proper cost benefit analysis.NZs public and private healthcare systems are quite intertwined
I’d really only be interested in reading a cost / benefit or financial analysis on splitting them out if it was done by a really competent, apolitical source that has a deep understanding of the health system (which would be a pipe dream) and no conflicts of interest
That is the issue, we don't have the $$$$$, so the current system will go backwards.My view is that we continue with the current public heath setup, but actually resource it right $$$$
When my wife got sick, we had the operation and most of the chemo (until that year's funding allowance run out) done privately because of her work's Southern Cross Medical Insurance. Her oncologist worked for both the ADHB and for Canopy Cancer Care. While Canopy were still administering the chemo, all the meetings were held there but once the insurance money had run out, the last 6 - 8 weeks of Herceptin were done at Auckland Hospital and all the meetings with the oncologist were held there. She was also able to have a Portacath installed... it drove her mad for the first few weeks and she wanted to rip it out. Then she got used to it.NZs public and private healthcare systems are quite intertwined
I’d really only be interested in reading a cost / benefit or financial analysis on splitting them out if it was done by a really competent, apolitical source that has a deep understanding of the health system (which would be a pipe dream) and no conflicts of interest
I had a lengthy discussion with a couple of surgeons and GPs a few years ago. Like, over a few days. Public heathcare is stretched. Usually the same specialist works in both public and private. Sometimes you’ll get dealt with faster in public, depending on how booked out the specialist is in private
Medically professionals acknowledge public is broken, and they are much better working in private. But the entire system relies upon them answering to a greater calling of helping out in public, working harder for less money. So they often end up doing both. A huge amount of goodwill is called upon and honoured
Now how on earth you clearly split that out wouldn’t be particularly easy.
My view is that we continue with the current public heath setup, but actually resource it right $$$$
NZ has become frightened of privatisation and other things like mining while still wanting to maintain our living standards primarily by taxing the rich. Todays rich are those that own their own home.
Thinking about it, I reckon we should privatise all health care asap.
My wife pays private health insurance covering operations only. She is aged in her early 60's and the annual premium is under $3k.
Private health care providers are already doing it for less than our current spend of $6k per person.
But expect a different service. Decent facilities, good food and no shit kickers intimidating staff or living with patients.