I am certain our young boys are being told not to let loose when they make it onto the bench. Pretty sure they are being inducted with the instruction of sticking to the plan. Those limits will not be imposed forever, the shackles from Webster will come off when he is satisfied that they have enough NRL road miles and street cred having stuck to his instructions over an extended period of time.
Pretty sure Webster is testing them for their ability to listen. Also pretty sure he will pull the trigger and tell them to go for it after they put in a requisite number of road miles proving they are trust worthy and Çoachable players.
I think it is pretty obvious that Webster is protecting the Juniors, we just saw our team flogged for the sake of protecting Laban and Roach.
Many fans are becrying that move. Blaming it soley on the loss. Fine, maybe it is the reason we lost,. But the thing most critiques of that move are too short sigthed to see....is that Webster is not planning to hold them back forever, this protection of the bench is temporary, yet the fans are hating on it like they think Webster is dumb and gonna do it forever.
Tom Ale is a good example of why that criticism is lacking.
And Rocco Berrys careful intro to becoming a serious NRL player pretty much dismisses the the sentiment that Webster is wrong in protecting his Juniors.
Rocco was thrown in the deep end. He struggled and almost drowned, he was one of the worst debutantes in Warriors history.
So Roccos micro management by the coaches, becomes the template for future NRL rookies, a template that allows for them being used sparingly and pulled when they struggle.