I noted it post game last week, we play a style that relies on the other team dropping their bundle. But doing it with a visibly busted up aging squad, that is being frontloaded with big minutes due to no bench so early in the season is a big worry for later down the track.
Granted we have no real other options to bring in, so there isn't much we can do about it. But the style of play isn't going to change, so how the squad fears as the season goes on will be interesting to watch.
I don't think the squad will change, don't really see any other more viable options personally. A bench of CHT, Walker, Ale, Laban is much easier on the eyes than what we saw on the weekend. So hopefully that's how we line up on Thursday.
I think we will make finals just fine, but we don't have the youthful exuberance of some of the other top squads. So that will be my main concern deeper in the season and in finals.
I am certain our young boys are being told not to let loose when they make it onto the bench. Pretty sure they are being inducted with the instruction of sticking to the plan. Those limits will not be imposed forever, the shackles from
Webster will come off when he is satisfied that they have enough NRL road miles and street cred having stuck to his instructions over an extended period of time.
Pretty sure
Webster is testing them for their ability to listen. Also pretty sure he will pull the trigger and tell them to go for it after they put in a requisite number of road miles proving they are trust worthy and Çoachable players.
I think it is pretty obvious that
Webster is protecting the Juniors, we just saw our team flogged for the sake of protecting
Laban and Roach.
Many fans are becrying that move. Blaming it soley on the loss. Fine, maybe it is the reason we lost,. But the thing most critiques of that move are too short sigthed to see....is that
Webster is not planning to hold them back forever, this protection of the bench is temporary, yet the fans are hating on it like they think
Webster is dumb and gonna do it forever.
Tom Ale is a good example of why that criticism is lacking.
And
Rocco Berrys careful intro to becoming a serious NRL player pretty much dismisses the the sentiment that
Webster is wrong in protecting his Juniors.
Rocco was thrown in the deep end. He struggled and almost drowned, he was one of the worst debutantes in Warriors history.
So Roccos micro management by the coaches, becomes the template for future NRL rookies, a template that allows for them being used sparingly and pulled when they struggle.