General The Boyd vs Metcalf debate

[timburgesstheonlyoneiknow]

The extension of Boyd must have been prioritised by the club and i suspect the Metcalfe issue may have been surfacing since he returned back from injury. I wonder if him and his manager were caught off guard when he returned and he was played at 6 instead of 7....maybe expecting Tannah to be dropped upon his return. Kudos to Webby he stuck to his guns.

Metcalfe is a good player but he is not indispensable..not like a Moses or Cleary or Munster. I have a hunch we may see very little of him in a Warriors jersey again. Good luck to him. H

 

[snake77]

So Gould doesn’t know much about Metcalf, injury status or anything actually, starts at 15:26.

Didn't know that he had played this year. Didn't know his injuries.

If he didn't know he played this year he isn't much of a rugby league analyst. I know we don't get much Channel 9 coverage. But, he has a great life, clipping the ticket from a number of companies to do with rugby league. One job is to watch games and comment on the competition.

Paul Kent joked about people trying to scout where the meeting between Gould and Metcalf would happen over Magic Round. The next day, he referenced that it won't be over the weekend. His understanding it had already happened.

If Metcalf has left for Sydney, then he has likely talked to a few clubs already.

Gould would have asked him on his fitness and would be aware of his goals and current situation. He might want to play ignorant due to the new rules around what the media personalities can say. You can still be aware that he played 1 and a bit games after an ACL injury.