Again why do Nq want to move him
On?
On?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
defence + They want Purdue as their long term fullbackAgain why do Nq want to move him
On?
Don't blame them. Purdue is a stud. Drinkwater is worse than DWZ on dee.defence + They want Purdue as their long term fullback
Don't blame them. Purdue is a stud. Drinkwater is worse than DWZ on dee.
Just from the eye test. Drinky is a shocking defender one on one. No heart at all. I rate him as a attacking weapon tho. I just can't get excited at having a backline of - Drinkwater at FB. DWZ, AKP Wings & Pompey & Charnze in the centres.Being generous, Drinkwater probably costs us 10 more tries over a year than CNK would.
Id hazard a guess he would also beat CNKs tries and try assists by more than 10.
Also another point is that Cowboys conceded 200 points more than us, so Drinkwater likely had another 30-40 tries that he would have had to try and save over what our fullback had to, so in theory if he's in a better defensive team, his frailties are less prominent
Quick stat comparison- average over the last 5 years
Cnk: 4 tries, 4 try assists, 85% tackle efficiency.
Ponga: 5 tries 12 try assists, 67% tackle efficiency.
Drinkwater: 10 tries 22 try assists 76% efficiency.
Provides another kicking option too.Holy....I mean, there's no contest hereAndrew Webster
Half price of Ponga at double the tries and try assists (both avg are better than Ponga's Dally M year) with a better tackling %
or
Same price as CNK at double the tries and QUINTUPLE the number of try assists at 9% less tackling %
Apparently he's on $650K? I'd throw Metcalf money at him
www.zerotackle.com
Assuming you're right and he is a backrower. Which of our current NSW cup backrowers would you put him infront of? Because personally i see more out of Fatialofa, EIT and Laban. 2 of which are 2+ years younger than him and the other being 1 year younger. Plus now we have another one with Gannon. IMO if he was to be a great backrower and a alright middle then we moved on the right guy.People commenting about his fitness and explosive runs but he lacks out and out endurance. That's why you don't play him in the middle as a prop and play him on an edge. If he turns out to be a star it will be on an edge. I will be a little annoyed if he turns into a star as it seems very obvious with his explosive power, pace and ability he has the potential to be a gamebreaking edge backrower, yet we persisted with him as a prop.
Storm is interesting- he started there and if memory serves me he was meant to be the replacement for slater but got injured and papi took his chance.What other teams might be in position to get Drinkwater? Storm? Us? Bears?
Storm is interesting- he started there and if memory serves me he was meant to be the replacement for slater but got injured and papi took his chance.
U would imagine they’re gonna back fa’alogo but who knows.