Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Warriors fans express frustration over their team's performance and officiating after a heavy loss to the Bulldogs, with significant debate around referee decisions seen as biased or inconsistent. Multiple users #28 #119 detail early penalties and questionable calls that shifted momentum, while others #45 #111 argue the Bulldogs' dominance made the result inevitable regardless of officiating. Player performances are heavily scrutinized, particularly regarding halves combinations and kicking deficiencies in wet conditions—user #117 questions the omission of Boyd's long-range kicking, and member #14 criticizes specific players like JFH and DWZ. The impact of injuries on team depth emerges as a key theme, with several users #57 #105 noting the absence of key playmakers like Metcalf and Barnett has exposed limitations in attack and squad rotation. Coaching decisions are debated, including bench management timing for Healey #34 #36 and perceived safe selections, though member #32 defends Webster given injury constraints. Despite concerns about missing the top eight, some members #57 #69 maintain perspective on the season's developmental value amid the setback.
Refereeing Issues, Player Performance, Injury Impact
Gee looked bemused initially in the game when DWZ stayed down and it was called a penalty and it went on from there. Think I heard him say he’d be penalised if he did it again when he walked over to address the team? Really tough one with DWZ because he’s got a reputation for this now, but on the other side of the coin he always gets the penalty, so has been hit high, so why shouldn’t you get the advantage that comes with it? It’s actually the ref who’s missed it and to blame, and I don’t think there’s any more theatrics than Crichton looking like he’s been sniped from a shove from JFHAsking for a friend
Has there been any other incident in the NRL this year where a player has been shouldered to the head & the ref doesn't give a penalty because "he lowered his head into his shoulder"?
For goodness sake we see head shots because a player is slipping and the pen is given and the slipping mitigates the actions of the defender but never exonerates him but last night it became the fault of the attacker
We weren't losing before he got HIA'dHas TMM done anything this year when playing?
Pretty harsh off the back of being knocked out early. So far this season he has asked to play virtually every position in the backline and some in the forwards.Has TMM done anything this year when playing?
They were good because they got confidence out of Adam Gee giving them free points early. I don't think the boys lost this one.That was a tough night at the office.
We seem to get teams better performances. The Dogs have been pretty poor in some of the games in the rain this year. Tonight they were good.
Tbf was very tough conditions that don't suit his style. He is not a down and dirty type player. Pity he was taken off but I still doubt his worth when the going gets tough.Pretty harsh off the back of being knocked out early. So far this season he has asked to play virtually every position in the backline and some in the forwards.
Yeah, I'm sure it's more a case of being really confused as a fan that it's gotten to this point - i.e. your team is not given a chance to compete - sure the dogs played to a plan last night and executed well but they had every chance to get their pattern going whereas we didn't - every time there was a chance for some continuity with the ball we were interrupted, whereas coming out of their end a casual six again or penalty helped the dogs over the halfway line - look at the first five minutes, Gee wants to call nothing on the head shot to DWZ (but yeah it's obvious so..), and conversely the first 6 again against Ford is ahem 'marginal' at best ... that's before you get to the truly baffling stuff - the Capewell tackle, the swinging arm and simultaneous shoulder to Demi's head under the posts that he 'ran into' - also how did TMM get HIA'd? did we ever see that?Honestly, it was a top 4 side vs a bottom 8 team last night. Thats where we are at with a side that is basically a third of nsw cup players if we were to select a full strength team.
The whole next man up only works for 2 or 3 players out of a side for a short period, not multiple weeks. And then to lose a half to concussion so early was a killer blow. Added to that, our forward pack got destroyed last night....
It cracks me up the amount of comments about the ref....even after we got completey out played in every aspect....sure there was some werid calls, but we got a couple too like the CHT late tackle..
On to next week at home....surely webby will call out his forward pack to get a response....
TMM was HIA'd making a tackle. Stumbled as he tried to get up.Yeah, I'm sure it's more a case of being really confused as a fan that it's gotten to this point - i.e. your team is not given a chance to compete - sure the dogs played to a plan last night and executed well but they had every chance to get their pattern going whereas we didn't - every time there was a chance for some continuity with the ball we were interrupted, whereas coming out of their end a casual six again or penalty helped the dogs over the halfway line - look at the first five minutes, Gee wants to call nothing on the head shot to DWZ (but yeah it's obvious so..), and conversely the first 6 again against Ford is ahem 'marginal' at best ... that's before you get to the truly baffling stuff - the Capewell tackle, the swinging arm and simultaneous shoulder to Demi's head under the posts that he 'ran into' - also how did TMM get HIA'd? did we ever see that?
It was a hard watch, bottom line tho is we were never in that game, Dogs played well and were allowed to
Webby couldn’t afford to have two choking halves against the dogsHas TMM done anything this year when playing?