The new Tav post match dropped.
Let's get this one viral
View: https://www.instagram.com/p/C9N8H_TS5zw/?hl=en
That blocker call was insane. Only 2 steps offside is fine
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Accor Stadium
06 Jul 2024
Match Stats
Bulldogs | Warriors | |
2 | Tries | 2 |
2 / 2 | Conversions | 2 / 3 |
0/1 | Field Goals | 0/1 |
0/0 | 2P Field Goals | 0/0 |
2 | Try Assists | 2 |
Bulldogs | Warriors | |
48% | Possession | 52% |
12 / 33 | Set Completion | 9 / 34 |
50 | Time in Opposition Half | 50 |
1485 | Metres Gained | 1566 |
1 | Dropouts | 1 |
2 | Dummy Half Runs | 4 |
23 / 775 | Kicks/Kick Metres | 28 / 723 |
0 | 40/20 | 0 |
0 | 20/40 | 0 |
11 | Offloads | 7 |
0 | 1 on 1 Steals | 0 |
3 | Line Breaks | 4 |
1 | Line Break Assists | 3 |
0 | Support Play | 0 |
Bulldogs | Warriors | |
12 / 33 | Set Completion | 9 / 34 |
6 | Penalties (Conceded) | 5 |
3 | Set Restarts | 2 |
13 | Errors | 14 |
Player Stats
# | Bulldogs | T | Pts | TA | LB | TB | OFF | Ta | MT | IT | Pos | DR | K | KM | M | E | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | C. Tracey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 177m | 2 | 0 |
2 | J. Kiraz | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0m | 179m | 0 | 0 |
3 | B. Xerri | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 111m | 0 | 0 |
4 | S. Crichton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 118m | 1 | 0 |
5 | B. Wilson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 1 | 7m | 205m | 3 | 0 |
6 | M. Burton | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 14 | 537m | 110m | 1 | 0 |
7 | T. Sexton | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 7 | 185m | 17m | 2 | 0 |
8 | M. King | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 105m | 0 | 1 |
9 | R. Mahoney | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 46m | 6m | 2 | 0 |
10 | S. Hughes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 38m | 1 | 0 |
11 | V. Kikau | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 51m | 0 | 1 |
12 | J. Salmon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 37m | 1 | 1 |
14 | K. Mann | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 43m | 0 | 1 |
13 | B. Hayward | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 28m | 0 | 1 |
15 | J. Curran | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 155m | 0 | 0 |
16 | K. Morrin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 105m | 0 | 1 |
17 | L. Hopoi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 0m | 0 | 0 |
19 | J. Skelton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 0m | 0 | 0 |
# | Warriors | T | Pts | TA | LB | TB | OFF | Ta | MT | IT | Pos | DR | K | KM | M | E | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | C. Nicoll-Klokstad | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 88m | 0 | 0 |
2 | D. Watene-Zelezniak | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 117m | 0 | 0 |
3 | R. Tuivasa-Sheck | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 183m | 2 | 0 |
4 | A. Pompey | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 88m | 0 | 0 |
5 | M. Montoya | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 86m | 1 | 1 |
6 | C. Harris-Tavita | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 13 | 443m | 13m | 4 | 0 |
7 | T. Martin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 0 | 14 | 274m | 59m | 5 | 1 |
8 | A. Fonua-Blake | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 162m | 0 | 1 |
9 | W. Egan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 40 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0m | 38m | 1 | 0 |
10 | M. Barnett | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 42 | 3 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 176m | 0 | 0 |
11 | M. Niukore | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 64m | 1 | 0 |
12 | K. Capewell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 86m | 0 | 0 |
15 | D. Walker | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 6m | 92m | 0 | 0 |
14 | F. Lussick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 43m | 0 | 0 |
16 | J. Tevaga | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 79m | 0 | 0 |
17 | J. Ford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 112m | 0 | 1 |
23 | L. Halasima | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 84m | 0 | 0 |
20 | T. Tuaupiki | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0m | 0m | 0 | 0 |
The new Tav post match dropped.
Let's get this one viral
View: https://www.instagram.com/p/C9N8H_TS5zw/?hl=en
This is particularly so as there was a 5 minute stoppage in play as both players were assessed for injury resulting from the incident. May be the fact that the bulldog came out worse (loss of teeth) influenced their decision to look just at the high contact and not the lateness of the tackle. Whatever the cause, Aynsley admitted an error had been made and a penalty should have given for both lateness of tackle and high contact. This view was particularly supported by Corey Parker and panelists on the NRL 360 show last night. Paul Crawley was particularly appalled that the decision (not to penalise) could be the difference between the Warriors making the finals or missing out, given the closeness of the competition.I’d really like to see Adam Gee singled out for this as the senior figure in the bunker. I as a fan and supporter just can’t wear the explanation that in looking for the high contact, the bunker forgot to look for lateness. This is just incompetence at the highest level at the least. Ex players like Andrew Johns are so vocal about protecting halves from late shots that this just seems so peculiar that an official forgets that this is one of the areas that they are looking for when rolling back footage to make decisions on
I like your golden point challenge. It would stop markers being offside against field goals.Sacking Annesley is not the answer, he will only be replaced by another suit and it will be rinse and repeat. The main thing that needs to be addressed is Accountability.
I'm keen to explore two options:
- Last 10 minute report (similar to NBA 2 minute report).
- An additional Captains Challenge in Golden point.
Last 10 min report:
An official review released by the NRL that evaluates the officiating in the final 10 minutes of games and any golden point periods.
The idea is one for accountability but also, we are rightly or wrongly fixated on one single decision. An officiating report may support we got robbed or show that on balance in the final 10 mins we or they or whatever should also have received penalties here, here and here...
It's not perfect but short of wheeling the officials out into a post match press conference (which is never ever going to happen) it is at least one way to find some accountability.
Golden Point Captains Challenge:
Each team shall receive 1 captains challenge in golden point
The refs are shit scared of making a decision, put the power into the players hands.
- You either keep the one you have
- If you have already used it, you get given 1 for golden point.
- We believe without Mahoneys tip, the kick seemed to be going over
- We believe Mahoney was not square at marker.
- We should have the right to challenge it!
Anyway, that's my two pieces I would like explored.
It depends whether the ref/bunker decides it is accidental or deliberate (ie leading with the head)I'm not suggesting it doesn't happen.
But surely we agree 90% of head clashes result in no further action both on and off-field?
In Union, 100% of head clashes are scrutinised on field with almost all resulting in immediate action.
But is it shown in New Zealand?The channel nine guys have taken a stand on it
I m sure they brought it up in the Footy Show on Sunday which I don’t think is shown in Aotearoa.
3 days have passed since the loss. And I have still not come up with a plausible reason why that penalty was not called.
Incompetence is not an answer as even a brand new ref with three weeks of experience would have called that.
In the past I have defended the refs and have provided other reasons I believed in why we didn't get 50 50 calls in our favour ie no team in the bottom 4 gets 50 50 calls in their favour and that the Tigers also get shafted when I watch them. But this call was not a 50 50 call. It was like a 100 to zero call. I have never seen the Warriors not a get a call like that before.
Still after being a sulk much of Monday night it came across me that we made the preliminary final last year and lost to the better team and it wasn't due to reffing. If the refs had it in for the Warriors we would not have made the top 8 last year let alone finishing 4th on the ladder.
So I don't think the missed penalty was an anti warriors decision. May be it was a pro - dogs decision. Maybe the refs want the dogs to be the cinderella team this year.
It was a biased call no doubt. But my belief it was a combination of a home town crowd pressuring the ref and not wanting to be booed and a pre game script by whoever is the illumaniti within the NRL who want Dogs to make the top four.
We were just collateral damage.
Do you mind expanding on your question please?But is it shown in New Zealand?
I get you on that but if it was Freddy Lussick you know he doesn't want another big ban. Everyone in that pack was gassed and rightly so and the disruption because of our injuries to the back three moved our fastest freshest sub of Leka to centre. Its not going to help but yeah. Keep posting broWorst part about this game was how none of our markers put any pressure on Burton. He had all the time in the world. Ultimately his kicking won them the game.