Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com

Interested to hear your thoughts on this miket12.
Petrol stations are not financed by taxpayers.
Why then should taxpayers front for charging stations.
Why not electricity suppliers and ev manufacturers?
Have I missed something here 😕
Asking you particularly because I respect your opinion
I think the RUC’s for BEV’s. (Considering the cost of providing the infrastructure) is right…. it looks as if the advise to both the current and previous governments was that BEV’s should have an “excise” of 50 cents for their impact on roads plus 26 cents for the new charging infrastructure.

Where I think they have got it wrong is with plug in hybrids. Most of them only have a relatively short range (a Mitusbishi Outlander will only get around 40km per charge) yet they’ll get hit with both the $53 charge (plus admin fee) per 1000km plus around $50 petrol excise per 1000km. That’s over $100 per 1000km compared to $76 per 1000km for a Tesla or $42 for a Toyota Rav 4 Hybrid per 1000km.
 
I think the RUC’s for BEV’s. (Considering the cost of providing the infrastructure) is right…. it looks as if the advise to both the current and previous governments was that BEV’s should have an “excise” of 50 cents for their impact on roads plus 26 cents for the new charging infrastructure.

Where I think they have got it wrong is with plug in hybrids. Most of them only have a relatively short range (a Mitusbishi Outlander will only get around 40km per charge) yet they’ll get hit with both the $53 charge (plus admin fee) per 1000km plus around $50 petrol excise per 1000km. That’s over $100 per 1000km compared to $76 per 1000km for a Tesla or $42 for a Toyota Rav 4 Hybrid per 1000km.
Thanks mate.
However the cost of establishing the charging stations falls back on the taxpayer.
Shouldn't the ev manufacturers and the electricity suppliers have some burden
 
Some just can't see the forest for the trees. Because they can't their solution is to cut down the trees. By the time they realise their mistake we're treeless and forestless.
This is actually deep and meaningful to me and a current conflict within myself.

I’ve recently been clearing some tall natives on a property and it pains my soul, the conflict between nature and progress…

Ahhhh… they are just trees… or is that just my selfish short term thinking 🤯

I’ll just put some bike parks in and offset the loses 👍
 
This is actually deep and meaningful to me and a current conflict within myself.

I’ve recently been clearing some tall natives on a property and it pains my soul, the conflict between nature and progress…

Ahhhh… they are just trees… or is that just my selfish short term thinking 🤯

I’ll just put some bike parks in and offset the loses 👍
Are you going to grow some hooch there Wiz. I can keep an eye out for the cops helicopters
 
Thanks mate.
However the cost of establishing the charging stations falls back on the taxpayer.
Shouldn't the ev manufacturers and the electricity suppliers have some burden
Why don’t you have to use a swipe card to active them eg credit card/ Apple Pay/ Tesla card?

Pay $10 or whatever to charge at a public charger. Why isn’t it user pays?
 
Not against RUC for BEVs and hybrids etc - But also, aren't we trying to incentivise EV uptake to help transition the national fleet?
This feels counter-intuitive to emission aims.

If anything this was probably a good opportunity to review the RUC scheme. Maye put in a lower tier to incentivise purchasing smaller vehicles. Roll all cars onto the RUC scheme and remove the petrol tax.
 
At public chargers? I honestly don’t know.

Can’t they put a slight markup on to cover the infrastructure?
The charging stations are owned by companies. I think ChargeNet is the largest?
I believe PaknSave offer free charging at their charging stations.

Public Charging Prices​

CHARGING NETWORKAC PER KWHDC PER KWHPER MINUTE CHARGEIDLE FEES
ChargeNet$0.40$0.80 – $0.85$1 / minute*
OpenLoop (includes WEL networks)$0.24 – $0.50$0.24 +
Z Energy$0.69
Hikotron$0.50
BP$0.70
Zero (Meridian)$0.50
JoltFree**$0.50
Jump Charging$0.75
Tesla Supercharger***Varies (0.40 – 0.85c). Check Tesla app for pricing$1 – $2 / minute
 
Not against RUC for BEVs and hybrids etc - But also, aren't we trying to incentivise EV uptake to help transition the national fleet?
This feels counter-intuitive to emission aims.

If anything this was probably a good opportunity to review the RUC scheme. Maye put in a lower tier to incentivise purchasing smaller vehicles. Roll all cars onto the RUC scheme and remove the petrol tax.
Apparently Treasury did the numbers. Because people with Hybrids and ICE vehicles average more Kms per year than BEV’s, removing all the fuel taxes and replacing them with RUC’s wouldn‘t have provided enough revenue as the government would receive under the new scheme and existing fuel taxes. Unfortunately, the bottom line, as typical of our governments, is money.

Interestingly, one large cargo ship supposedly creates more greenhouse gases each year than 50 million ICE cars. Maybe we’re focusing in the wrong direction and instead of being concerned about ICE vs BEV vs PHEV vs HEV and looking at shipping moving away from the heavy fuel they use.
 
The charging stations are owned by companies. I think ChargeNet is the largest?
I believe PaknSave offer free charging at their charging stations.

Public Charging Prices​

CHARGING NETWORKAC PER KWHDC PER KWHPER MINUTE CHARGEIDLE FEES
ChargeNet$0.40$0.80 – $0.85$1 / minute*
OpenLoop (includes WEL networks)$0.24 – $0.50$0.24 +
Z Energy$0.69
Hikotron$0.50
BP$0.70
Zero (Meridian)$0.50
JoltFree**$0.50
Jump Charging$0.75
Tesla Supercharger***Varies (0.40 – 0.85c). Check Tesla app for pricing$1 – $2 / minute
If private companies provide the infrastructure then why is the govt investing in it?

Trying to get my head around this as it’s all new to me.
 
If private companies provide the infrastructure then why is the govt investing in it?

Trying to get my head around this as it’s all new to me.
Always good to have the Govt in control of critical infrastructure, imagine they will be slightly cheaper as well with the govt having different profit motives.
Whether it will happen or not, we'll wait an see.
 
This is actually deep and meaningful to me and a current conflict within myself.

I’ve recently been clearing some tall natives on a property and it pains my soul, the conflict between nature and progress…

Ahhhh… they are just trees… or is that just my selfish short term thinking 🤯

I’ll just put some bike parks in and offset the loses 👍
What you take away you should give back. Like for like as much as possible. Cutting down natives affect habitats, birdlife, insects, and other ecosystems.
In other words, if you are cutting down natives for real, make sure you know what you are changing forever in that place and replant to make up for it as best you can.
You 've heard the saying "a butterfly flaps its wings"? Or in scientific teerms "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". It may not be in your face visible but you start a not necessarily visible chain of events.
A lot of people view native trees like introduced ones but they're not.
If its for the value of the wood at the very least you are short-sighted. If its to grow a business money-making venture, its selfish if you don't at the very least try to put back what you take.
I know you probably won't listen, maybe not even care, I just know the cutting down of native trees has consequences for us all over time.
 
What you take away give back.
In other words, if you are cutting down natives for real, make sure you know what you are changing forever in that place and replant to make up for it as best you can.
You 've heard the saying "a butterfly flaps its wings"? Or in scintific teerms "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". It may not be in your face visible but you,ve started a chain of events.
A lot of people view native trees like introduced ones but they're not.
If its for the value of the wood at the very least you are short-sighted. If its to grow a business money-making venture, its selfish if you don't at least try to put back what you take.
I know you probably won't listen, maybe not even care, I just know the cutting down of native trees has consequences for us all over time.
It’s for real. You can cut down natives but you can’t sell the logs or wood. So definitely not for the money.

It is for a business. Unfortunate their located too close to buildings and infrastructure. We are very environmentally aware and are planting more replacements than we’re removing.

But I still do feel torn taking out huge trees.
 
It’s for real. You can cut down natives but you can’t sell the logs or wood. So definitely not for the money.

It is for a business. Unfortunate their located too close to buildings and infrastructure. We are very environmentally aware and are planting more replacements than we’re removing.

But I still do feel torn taking out huge trees.
I see the conumdrum.
Great that you feel it and have a reasonable reason for felling them.
I can only say gift them to local iwi who will transform them into meaningful pieces, surprised (well maybe not) that they aren't involved anyway. Your solutions for replacement go a long way towards doing the right thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom