Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com

Pragmatism vs ideology? Top of our street has had millions invested in cycle lanes, complete reconfiguration of parking, footpaths and roads to accomodate them, plus it severely impacted business owners during the construction phase. It is very rare to see a cyclist on those multi-million dollar cycle paths.
That's because cycle lanes are very efficient, unlike roads. And have you been to Auckland lately, car driving in the city is in decline and everyone is whizzing about on bikes, scooters and on foot?
 
That's because cycle lanes are very efficient, unlike roads. And have you been to Auckland lately, car driving in the city is in decline and everyone is whizzing about on bikes, scooters and on foot?
I walk into Auckland CBD every week day. I don’t see many cyclists and hardly anyone uses scooters these days. There’s a few walking. Buses also don’t seem to be as full as pre-Covid. Perhaps that just my area however I doubt it.
 
That's because cycle lanes are very efficient, unlike roads. And have you been to Auckland lately, car driving in the city is in decline and everyone is whizzing about on bikes, scooters and on foot?
Are there any stats to support this?

Last I heard biking was supposed to be 17% of transport journeys now with the investment given but it’s still under 1% with no noticeable change. Many have said about our hilly, wet climate and geographic spread, we aren’t ever going to be Amsterdam.
Personally I think we’ve over extended trying to build a cycle, bus and train network at the same time and aren’t necessarily doing a good job trying to force solutions that aren’t delivering outcomes while at the same time underinvesting in roading.

Too much quantity too fast and not enough quality. As with the ferry’s we need someone a-political to come up with an overall strategy based on NZ tying in all transport modes. It should be based on density and city size - ie Tauranga is pushing a bus policy without the density and it’s just doomed to fail, whereas Auckland should be prioritising buses.
 
Are there any stats to support this?

Last I heard biking was supposed to be 17% of transport journeys now with the investment given but it’s still under 1% with no noticeable change. Many have said about our hilly, wet climate and geographic spread, we aren’t ever going to be Amsterdam.
Personally I think we’ve over extended trying to build a cycle, bus and train network at the same time and aren’t necessarily doing a good job trying to force solutions that aren’t delivering outcomes while at the same time underinvesting in roading.

Too much quantity too fast and not enough quality. As with the ferry’s we need someone a-political to come up with an overall strategy based on NZ tying in all transport modes. It should be based on density and city size - ie Tauranga is pushing a bus policy without the density and it’s just doomed to fail, whereas Auckland should be prioritising buses.
Yes there is data to support this.

Do a masters degree in transport engineering like I did and then we can talk.
 
Mini budget out today. Usual political stuff and blame game, but what sticks out:

Treasury says the country is expected to enter a real GDP per capita recession, with GPD per head of population going backwards for two consecutive years.

This is not political, this is the real world affecting us all. This is the real economy faltering resulting in our standard of living going backwards. Tough times ahead…
 
Are there any stats to support this?

Last I heard biking was supposed to be 17% of transport journeys now with the investment given but it’s still under 1% with no noticeable change. Many have said about our hilly, wet climate and geographic spread, we aren’t ever going to be Amsterdam.
Personally I think we’ve over extended trying to build a cycle, bus and train network at the same time and aren’t necessarily doing a good job trying to force solutions that aren’t delivering outcomes while at the same time underinvesting in roading.

Too much quantity too fast and not enough quality. As with the ferry’s we need someone a-political to come up with an overall strategy based on NZ tying in all transport modes. It should be based on density and city size - ie Tauranga is pushing a bus policy without the density and it’s just doomed to fail, whereas Auckland should be prioritising buses.
Wiz
I would have thought the Kiwi rail engineers and finance guru s would have been a political
 
Back
Top Bottom