I saw all I needed to see pretty quick and didnβt bother reading on. Was there a copy of the survey sent out to the journalists to understand what type of questioning involved to reach that outcome?Based on those biased folks at Massey university and curio research.
As shown on the graphs
Politicians need to belittled! So do the sheep who think they will save them! Lucky us Panda's are more clever than that!So the answer is shrug your shoulders and belittle? I'll take this as an acknowledgement from you that the right are indeed toxic and are indeed pushing an agenda that fucks all of us bar the very rich and entitled.
Oh and
Unfortunately one sets the policy and rules, being the politicians. Who are the pandas apart from Chinese bears?Politicians need to belittled! So do the sheep who think they will save them! Lucky us Panda's are more clever than that!
Everytime someone posts something, I treat it the same. I look at who wrote it and what was written. A quick skim showed that it was self reported. Pretty hard to argue bias in that case. Also zero reason to suspect manipulation. In fact 2/3rds seems low based on real world observation.
And it was posted as a rebuttal to a claim that showed zero evidence to support that claim.
The US governed the world because thatβs what the superpower of the world does whether itβs rightly or wrongly in your view how they do it. When we hear make America great again, or even make the world great again, what part of history are we referring to? Because history is very toxic the further we go back for some ethnicities, genders, orientations, species and poverty stricken. Thatβs not to say we havenβt progressed, and not to say we havenβt got some way still to go so many more are brought along for the ride and not a select few. Also not to say I donβt believe in more self awareness in lifting oneself out of their situation whatever that may be and whether itβs achievable. Ardern may not have reached her goals set, but I believe they were set for the betterment of the country. I donβt believe city were prioritised over farmers, but believe when looking at the state of some of our waterways that farmers are at the mercy of those dragging the chain in regards to whatβs expected. Not only farmers either as big polluters. Tenants over landlords, I still see rent as being too high as it has been for what the money rents. I understand that the state some were left in by tenants probably contributed to this, but would rather have seen something created blacklisting poor tenants. Employees over employers. Being that inflation wasnβt in NZ alone but most of the world to varying degrees, I can only imagine it would have been worse with the likes of the 30c minimum payrise recently given. Though I doubt what they did receive really shifted the dial. MΔori over others? Gizza bit more on that reasoning? Public transport over cars seems smart to lower congestion in particular places like Auckland roads
Methodology as listed on page 2 of the report:
Joe Rogan and Walt Disney of Tauranga identify as left leaning.
So, every survey and poll would be considered the same then? I don't think it's inappropriate to post this survey as a rebuttal to an unsubstantiated post claiming the media is predominantly right biased. Considering the majority of articles this year have seemed to be anti the government and their policies, I'm not seeing any justification for the original post.
Same way they can project elections with a fraction of the vote counted.
This is worse than conspiracy theorists and venturing into flat earth territory. Shifting from there's "no evidence" to "the evidence is false" is wild esp when the evidence is a self reported survey on an individuals beliefs
In saying that, they were essentially the closest to being correct in the '23 election:
Political polls have 1000 people out of 5m and are usually pretty accurate. The university level pollsters who are trained in statistics well above us, give a margin of error of only 2.25% so pretty conclusive.
The point was it wasn't 1000 people, it was 359...
But they are just writing an article based on Massey university polling and researchβ¦
So the university doesnβt know what it was talking about and doesnβt understand statistics
I'm obviously talking in general, not the specific article.
