Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

NZWarriors.com

Sigh. Here's how they record the data mate:


It is literally if someone says they identify as say four ethnicities, it's a standardised way of distilling that information so they are only counted in the stats once.

So its not priority in care, its priority in stats.
Well ok. I can cede that point because it makes sense. You sound like an analytical person.

So following on from this, the distillation of data upweights one race over the other based on the priorities. This will result in that race being:
A) over represented in medical conditions, and
B) allocated more medical care than someone else who ticks only a non-priority box

So by its nature of data collection, it inherently favours the prioritised fields

And that’s in addition to actual prioritisation of surgery lists by non-medical bureaucrats
 

NZWarriors.com

Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Well ok. I can cede that point because it makes sense. You sound like an analytical person.

So following on from this, the distillation of data upweights one race over the other based on the priorities. This will result in that race being:
A) over represented in medical conditions, and
B) allocated more medical care than someone else who ticks only a non-priority box

So by its nature of data collection, it inherently favours the prioritised fields

And that’s in addition to actual prioritisation of surgery lists by non-medical bureaucrats
You are conflating two seperate things..

All of these ethnicities are provided by the patient, if the race is over represented in medical conditions that's because it's likely the actual number.

Allocation of medical care has nothing to do with the priorities that you presented in this picture. That's an entirely separate thing.
 
Sigh. Here's how they record the data mate:


It is literally if someone says they identify as say four ethnicities, it's a standardised way of distilling that information so they are only counted in the stats once.

So its not priority in care, its priority in stats.
Those stats are used to make decisions and therefore they are flawed.

Example - my mother needs medication that is free to Maori and not to her. She has the exact same critical need as any Maori.
 

NZWarriors.com

Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Sigh. Here's how they record the data mate:


It is literally if someone says they identify as say four ethnicities, it's a standardised way of distilling that information so they are only counted in the stats once.

So its not priority in care, its priority in stats.
These protocols are used all across govt. eg I know for a fact education uses the same priority based racial system.

So the question is, can you answer if a Maori or a European is more lively to be under achieving in school if all multiethnic Maori/ European children are not included as European?

And we then make funding decisions based on trash data…
 
These protocols are used all across govt. eg I know for a fact education uses the same priority based racial system.

So the question is, can you answer if a Maori or a European is more lively to be under achieving in school if all multiethnic Maori/ European children are not included as European?

And we then make funding decisions based on trash data…
Did you read anything I wrote? The priority system is for the recording of data, nothing to do with medical priority.
 

NZWarriors.com

Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Did you read anything I wrote? The priority system is for the recording of data, nothing to do with medical priority.
As I said, the same priority system is used across multiple govt departments.

In education there are annual surveys that default children to the highest priority race. These surveys are used to determine funding for programmes, where resources are spent, changes to the curriculum, etc.

They are quoted in news releases and used to inform debates.

And are misinformation. Again, who is more likely to be underachieving in school and where’s the proof?
 
As I said, the same priority system is used across multiple govt departments.

In education there are annual surveys that default children to the highest priority race. These surveys are used to determine funding for programmes, where resources are spent, changes to the curriculum, etc.

They are quoted in news releases and used to inform debates.

And are misinformation.
Please read this and tell me its the same priority system, your are conflating two seperate things.

 

NZWarriors.com

Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
It’s 41 pages mate. I’m saying the govt is using data that skews it towards priority outcomes and it’s wrong.
You are confusing the argument, I am not talking about that.

I am talking about the way they record ethnicity data, its got nothing to do with what you are talking about.

I present you with facts that you refuse to look at and think its got to do with a seperate issue 😂
 
You are confusing the argument, I am not talking about that.

I am talking about the way they record ethnicity data, its got nothing to do with what you are talking about.

I present you with facts that you refuse to look at and think its got to do with a seperate issue 😂
Why record ethnicity data?
 

NZWarriors.com

Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Actions and outcomes, not disinformation should the yardstick.
Example of misinformation quoted in media:

9B3B731B-B694-4BC1-AD07-3A6110F7E686.webp
When most inmates will be multiple ethnicities there is no way the total ethnic population can equal 100%. In reality Europeans in prison would be higher than Maori if people of combined Maori and European ancestry were identified as both rather than defaulted to Maori as our govt priority data does.

This is a disservice to Maori when these stats are always quoted labelling Maori. I would be in an uproar if I was Maori and the data was being deliberately skewed to make me look worse.

 
You are confusing the argument, I am not talking about that.

I am talking about the way they record ethnicity data, its got nothing to do with what you are talking about.

I present you with facts that you refuse to look at and think its got to do with a seperate issue 😂
That's wiz. Facts get steam hollered in his neoliberal world
 
    Nobody is reading this thread right now.
Back
Top Bottom