Come on benj don't be a NoitallI take offense to that. Only some?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.
Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence
Come on benj don't be a NoitallI take offense to that. Only some?
I'm good, but not quite that goodCome on benj don't be a Noitall
Wait, so you DO want an authoritarian government. Im glad we agree!Gordon Campbell on point - https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL2501/S00042/deepseek-and-chinas-inexorable-rise.htm
You found the middle ground! The rest is mere details.Wait, so you DO want an authoritarian government. Im glad we agree!
I clicked on the link, expecting to read an article about Jacinda and Grant?!The least democratic government of our time - https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/01/28/g...aws-passed-without-select-committee-scrutiny/
Most urgent govt after 6 years of non delivery on election promises like Kiwibuild and light rail.The least democratic government of our time - https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/01/28/g...aws-passed-without-select-committee-scrutiny/
Sounds like a conspiracy to me. What are you smoking?Most urgent govt after 6 years of non delivery on election promises like Kiwibuild and light rail.
Is it also linked to the increases in house prices during those same periods?I read an article online today and, in the comment written below the article from readers was one I couldn't believe.... especially with all the talk of National being pro landlords and anti-tenants.... that financially, renters face less increases in their rents under National than Labour.
So, I checked the annual data for rent increases and compared it to which party was in government at the time. I was shocked by the results.
Since 2001, from the data in the chart linked below (except the 2024 figure was pre the last quarter annual rental inflation figure of 4.2%), rents went up an average of 5.1% during Clark's government and 5.2% on average under Ardern/Hipkins but only 3.6% under Key/English. Of the year's when the rate of increase was over last year's 4.2%, only two out of the 13 occurred under a National government, the higher rental inflation occurred under Labour (include last year's 4.2% and it changes to four out of 15 times).
For all the comments about how the last government "helping" renters by doing things like removing the ability to claim interest of mortgages, that government had the worst average increase.
I wonder if this has more to do with landlords facing less expenses under a National government or if it's more to do with inflation/salary increases.
![]()
Regional Economic Profile | New Zealand | Average rents
rep.infometrics.co.nz
The data below is "fudged" a tiny bit because the start of the year's shown doesn't coincide with election night.
View attachment 11581
Here's the link to the original Herald article.
![]()
‘Open season on renters’: No-cause eviction rules spark debate
No-cause evictions are reinstated, allowing landlords 90 days' notice.www.nzherald.co.nz
And the comment which I didn't believe...
View attachment 11582
But I thought National were responsible for housing affordability issues.... not LabourIs it also linked to the increases in house prices during those same periods?
Imagine the GFC and the CHCH earthquake is doing a fair bit of lifting here for National. Can almost guarantee it had very little to do with policy.I read an article online today and, in the comment written below the article from readers was one I couldn't believe.... especially with all the talk of National being pro landlords and anti-tenants.... that financially, renters face less increases in their rents under National than Labour.
So, I checked the annual data for rent increases and compared it to which party was in government at the time. I was shocked by the results.
Since 2001, from the data in the chart linked below (except the 2024 figure was pre the last quarter annual rental inflation figure of 4.2%), rents went up an average of 5.1% during Clark's government and 5.2% on average under Ardern/Hipkins but only 3.6% under Key/English. Of the year's when the rate of increase was over last year's 4.2%, only two out of the 13 occurred under a National government, the higher rental inflation occurred under Labour (include last year's 4.2% and it changes to four out of 15 times).
For all the comments about how the last government "helping" renters by doing things like removing the ability to claim interest of mortgages, that government had the worst average increase.
I wonder if this has more to do with landlords facing less expenses under a National government or if it's more to do with inflation/salary increases.
![]()
Regional Economic Profile | New Zealand | Average rents
rep.infometrics.co.nz
The data below is "fudged" a tiny bit because the start of the year's shown doesn't coincide with election night.
View attachment 11581
Here's the link to the original Herald article.
![]()
‘Open season on renters’: No-cause eviction rules spark debate
No-cause evictions are reinstated, allowing landlords 90 days' notice.www.nzherald.co.nz
And the comment which I didn't believe...
View attachment 11582
perception does not always meet reality.But I thought National were responsible for housing affordability issues.... not Labour
Interesting then that the inflation caused by the GFC didn't result in a spike in rents but inflation caused by the COVID response did?Imagine the GFC and the CHCH earthquake is doing a fair bit of lifting here for National. Can almost guarantee it had very little to do with policy.
Also, the rental price is heavily linked to wages.Interesting then that the inflation caused by the GFC didn't result in a spike in rents but inflation caused by the COVID response did?
So you could say, Labour is better at increasing wages.Also, the rental price is heavily linked to wages.
While that's true most of the time.... it's not always.So you could say, Labour is better at increasing wages.
Neither party is conquering the affordability problem.
Oh, and Muldoon lied.... he didn't hand the money back but used it to fund his "Think Big" projects.And something from the archives to make you realise that trying to scare voters isn't something new...