Politics šŸ—³ļø NZ Politics

šŸ¤– AI Summary

šŸ“ Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

šŸ·ļø Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

šŸ“Š Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ā±ļø Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com

Rents are driven by supply and demand

Those are the only two drivers

Sure, there are indirect factors driving rents, but ultimately those factors influence supply and demand

Rents aren’t cost plus, or anything else. Landlords have a commodity and take this to the market
But if you have costs like interest deductibility rules; tenant first rules, significant healthy homes cost, etc that make people not want to be landlords anymore (keep empty or switch to air B&B) then that reduces supply so those changes can push up rent.

Also if you have costs that affect all landlords equally (skyrocketing rates; insurance; mortgage) then if landlords react as a group the price can change without supply and demand as the tenants can’t simply switch to a cheaper option. Ie if costs rise by inflation generally rents will rise by inflation.
 
But if you have costs like interest deductibility rules; tenant first rules, significant healthy homes cost, etc that make people not want to be landlords anymore (keep empty or switch to air B&B) then that reduces supply so those changes can push up rent.
agreed
Also if you have costs that affect all landlords equally (skyrocketing rates; insurance; mortgage) then if landlords react as a group the price can change without supply and demand as the tenants can’t simply switch to a cheaper option. Ie if costs rise by inflation generally rents will rise by inflation.
well, I agree if they act as a group. But in reality, mum and dad landlords don't act as a group. They just try to get the best price and minimise vacancies. It really is a commodity product, and landlords' abilities to influence the market (on their own) is limited and futile to try. Vacancies come up at different times and the best hope is to just get market rent

Fine theoretically if they all band together. But each is beholden to their own situation. If the numbers cease to stack up they either hold their breath for as long as they can with a desired rental rate (and hope not to suffocate) or just sell and find another investment. If they are cashed up and have no finance costs, they can just do a landbank. But these guys wouldn't be affected by interest deductibility anyway
 
Political games.

No matter how great it might be we are going to get negative left media saying it wasn’t ready in time; tastes horrible; kids are starving. The anti anything coalition media have an angle, already clearly shown when the changes were announced.

If you didn’t foresee this reaction you don’t understand politics. Expect a trail of articles all week long until the media realise nobody cares about entitled people crying over a free lunch 🄱
 
Political games.

No matter how great it might be we are going to get negative left media saying it wasn’t ready in time; tastes horrible; kids are starving. The anti anything coalition media have an angle, already clearly shown when the changes were announced.

If you didn’t foresee this reaction you don’t understand politics. Expect a trail of articles all week long until the media realise nobody cares about entitled people crying over a free lunch 🄱
I know a parent at one of these schools, 2nd day of the food yesterday at a large school in central Auckland. First day of school the day prior, food was half frozen, kids were eating half raw butter chicken. Second day at 2.40pm the lunches still hadn't arrived.

I understand that there would be teething issues so hopefully this shit is sorted out soon!
 
Last edited:
Political games.

No matter how great it might be we are going to get negative left media saying it wasn’t ready in time; tastes horrible; kids are starving. The anti anything coalition media have an angle, already clearly shown when the changes were announced.

If you didn’t foresee this reaction you don’t understand politics. Expect a trail of articles all week long until the media realise nobody cares about entitled people crying over a free lunch 🄱
You're so hilariously biased wiz, complete with brand new fiction and denial every day
 
I don’t particularly care about how tasty the free lunch is, or whether kids enjoy eating it

But logistically, it really does need to arrive on time and meet food safety from day 1. So people relying on it aren’t stuffed around

Not a major political issue but not a great look for the suppliers
Yes, but fundamentally centrally planned services never deliver well.

Hospitals, public transport, etc. always struggling to meet demand. And don’t start me on pensioners complaining the govt isn’t paying enough…

If parents provide their kids with lunch it will be what the kids will eat and there daily…
 
You're so hilariously biased wiz, complete with brand new fiction and denial every day
To show I’m politically central, here’s a left issue I support.

Banks shouldn’t be de-banking anyone unless it’s illegal.

Our banking institutes are part of a centrally controlled monetary system and everyone should have the opportunity to participate.

I don’t support de-banking petrol stations, mining or even Gloriavale. Access to banking has to be a fundamental right (unless illegal) in an inclusive society.

Go NZ First and stick it to the big banks!
 
To show I’m politically central, here’s a left issue I support.

Banks shouldn’t be de-banking anyone unless it’s illegal.

Our banking institutes are part of a centrally controlled monetary system and everyone should have the opportunity to participate.

I don’t support de-banking petrol stations, mining or even Gloriavale. Access to banking has to be a fundamental right (unless illegal) in an inclusive society.

Go NZ First and stick it to the big banks!
The very definition of fantasy is your first sentence
 
The very definition of fantasy is your first sentence
So you support the ACT liberterian type attitude that banks can decide for themselves? By the rich, for the rich?

Next the banks will be de-banking poor people because they don’t like who they work for… get ā€˜em NZ First!

This thread is getting confusing but I will always stick up for middle NZ!
 
Political games.

No matter how great it might be we are going to get negative left media saying it wasn’t ready in time; tastes horrible; kids are starving. The anti anything coalition media have an angle, already clearly shown when the changes were announced.

If you didn’t foresee this reaction you don’t understand politics. Expect a trail of articles all week long until the media realise nobody cares about entitled people crying over a free lunch 🄱
So predictable - bark at every dog passing… oops, it was there own dog !

ā€˜Labour’s Jan Tinetti’s attempt to criticise the Government’s free school lunch programme has backfired after she laid into a burger made when her party was in power.’ 🤣

Really highlights the negative at all cost mindset. So predictable from the left 🄱

 
    Nobody is reading this thread right now.
Back
Top Bottom