The clown was probably told, but decided to Google the answer she actually wanted.Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
Interesting in regards to the apparent lack of communication between the Police Minister and the Police
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.
Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence
The clown was probably told, but decided to Google the answer she actually wanted.Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
Interesting in regards to the apparent lack of communication between the Police Minister and the Police
Not at all. One kid died after being released, nd the other went AWOL attending his tangi. Continuation of the same behavioral issues.Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
Some unfortunate news out of the bootcamps too
Certainly not having the desired outcomeNot at all. One kid died after being released, nd the other went AWOL attending his tangi. Continuation of the same behavioral issues.
You think instantly fixing all of NZ youths cultural issues was a desired outcome?Certainly not having the desired outcome
Was there another desired outcome?You think instantly fixing all of NZ youths cultural issues was a desired outcome?
You think instantly fixing all of NZ youths cultural issues was a desired outcome?
If you think there's an INSTANT fix to human behavioral problems outside of a bullet, then you really need to sit the conversation out. Would need at least a decade of worth of data to start determining outcomes. How long have bootcamps been running?Was there another desired outcome?
Even a 50% success rate would be a massive community win, one that would extrapolate with time. But bleeding heart lefties see 50% that as a fault of the intervention rather than the system.Revealed: 15-year-old bootcamp participant’s alleged crime spree
He's facing five charges for alleged crimes over three days.www.nzherald.co.nz
Children’s Minister Karen Chhour said on Thursday she was disappointed in the alleged reoffending, but believed it would be naive to think none of those participating would reoffend.
“I’m saddened that this young person has not taken this opportunity at a second chance,” she said in a statement.
“We were hopeful this would not occur, but we understand the complexities in the lives of these young people. Ultimately, what they do with these opportunities is up to them.”
She said the pilot had learnt from previous military-style programmes, with a key differentiating factor being that support was given to the participants after they left the residence and returned to the community.
“I am confident the residential stage of the Military-Style Academy pilot is having success.
“Several of the boys left the programme with jobs already lined up. Each one has a mentor who is working with them and there is intensive, tailored support for each young person.”
May not be the answer for everyone but surely having some of these kids coming through this with jobs lined up must be a win? Time will tell whether this helps in the long run. What has been in place previously doesn't appear to have been effective to any degree for these young offenders
You seem to have a keen eye for numbers, surely the noted failures of these boot camps worldwide would have been a concern prior?Even a 50% success rate would be a massive community win, one that would extrapolate with time. But bleeding heart lefties see 50% that as a fault of the intervention rather than the system.
Definitely seems to have been a concern.You seem to have a keen eye for numbers, surely the noted failures of these boot camps worldwide would have been a concern prior?
Unfortunately politics is all about outcomes. National came in saying this was a fix, and fair that it needs time. But headlines like this won’t take long for any public support that bootcamps had to disappear if there’s no bang for buck and they’re running amok or escaping from the bootcamp. Polls show that more of the country feels like it’s heading in the wrong direction than those feeling that it is and this only fuels that feeling at the moment with many opposed to the initiative in the first placeIf you think there's an INSTANT fix to human behavioral problems outside of a bullet, then you really need to sit the conversation out. Would need at least a decade of worth of data to start determining outcomes. How long have bootcamps been running?
One left almost immediately.Definitely seems to have been a concern.
The pilot had learnt from previous military-style programmes, with a key differentiating factor being that support was given to the participants after they left the residence and returned to the community.
I don't know if 'boot camps' is part of an answer or not, will be effective in any way or not but I find it strange that the parties against it, despite the pilot apparently having several young offenders going out with jobs available to them, have had the last 6 years to provide some alternative solution and haven't as far as I can tell. I feel like it's a must be negative towards it because we are in opposition type scenario.
The bigger fail is using red on a National promotion!
Both parties trying to be hip with the kids and do their Spotify Wrapped playlists for the yearThe bigger fail is using red on a National promotion!
Did a summer intern do the job?
What is the cost otherwise?One left almost immediately.
One has absconded and is now being sought by the police.
And another has re-offended.
Unrelated, but a fourth has passed away.
Hopefully the six others are proving better though, especially at the apparent $400,000 its costing the taxpayer per person.
Isn't it intriguing that the headline was youth just out of boot camp reoffends and wasnt several kids successfully leave with jobs lined up.Unfortunately politics is all about outcomes. National came in saying this was a fix, and fair that it needs time. But headlines like this won’t take long for any public support that bootcamps had to disappear if there’s no bang for buck and they’re running amok or escaping from the bootcamp. Polls show that more of the country feels like it’s heading in the wrong direction than those feeling that it is and this only fuels that feeling at the moment with many opposed to the initiative in the first place
$100k per person isn’t it?Hopefully the six others are proving better though, especially at the apparent $400,000 it’s costing the taxpayer per person.