Worried2Death
Contributor
Never heard anyone argue that, even the most hardcore Labour voter
Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics
- Thread starter wizard of Tauranga
- Start date
NZWarriors.com
And the path to privatisation is well under way. Corrupt liars stealing our wealth and assets from under us.
www.interest.co.nz
Auckland Council and Watercare are getting a financial divorce
The Government will pass legislation barring Council or Crown support for Auckland’s Watercare as an alternative to Labour’s Three Waters reform
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
- Thread starter
- #8,484
The negative left would complain at a funeral.
So predictably anti EVERYTHiNG they lose credibility.
There’s a lot to be said for picking your battles…
- Thread starter
- #8,485
National was voted in with a clear policy platform with aims to encourage productivity, the economy, realign taxes, reduce and demand efficiency from the public services, etc.
Most of this was returning policy to what it was before Labour changed it.
When the left argue against simply returning policies to pre Labour they are actually saying the failed ideological policies of Labour are better despite all evidence saying otherwise. Blinded by their ideology. Blinded to it failing. Blinded at how bad NZ had became.
Example: removing interest deductibility - which no other country has in the world, treasury advised against it and it’s failed with less housing and higher rent. Yet how many times do we hear the left criticise returning things to the worldwide normal as though it was a great policy?
By all means fight for a fairer, better, more equal, etc society. But do it based on the fundamentals that achieve this - not the last Labours warped policies that can only; and did lead to failure.
From a former Clark/ Cullen Labour voter. The policies were the problem not the ideals.
Last edited:
Three waters had it covered in a far superior solution
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Three Waters was going to cost far more for worse outcomes as shown in Scotland where they have more boil water notices than in NZ and where the major of money for new infrastructure is provided in the main cities disportioncate to the population. Three Waters was designed to be the same…. the designer of the Scottish system was the same one brought in to establish the system here.
- Thread starter
- #8,488
Exactly. Simply ideology with no evidence it will work.
Similar with most of the recent Labour policies.
Your entire commentary to date.
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
No matter which of the two main parties are in power. It probably happens with the smaller parties when they have ministers.
One thing you can guarantee is they will make a statement on some figures. Then we get is that a total or additional?
We get it with additional/new policemen, doctors or teachers.
Mark Mitchell sounds like he's doing a who is on first routine.
"Are the 810 new beds, are they on top of the 500 already being built at Waikeria?" the Government was asked.
"No, no," Mitchell replied.
"So, you're only doing 200 extra beds, not 800 extra beds?" the Government was asked.
"No, there's an extra 800 beds going into the system," Luxon said
"But 600 of them were funded by the Labour Government?" they were asked.
"Well, well," Mitchell replied.
Just 200 more beds the Government said, not 800.
"I think what we're doing is we're re-staking our commitment as the incoming Government to get that delivered," Mitchell said.
www.newshub.co.nz
One thing you can guarantee is they will make a statement on some figures. Then we get is that a total or additional?
We get it with additional/new policemen, doctors or teachers.
Mark Mitchell sounds like he's doing a who is on first routine.
"Are the 810 new beds, are they on top of the 500 already being built at Waikeria?" the Government was asked.
"No, no," Mitchell replied.
"So, you're only doing 200 extra beds, not 800 extra beds?" the Government was asked.
"No, there's an extra 800 beds going into the system," Luxon said
"But 600 of them were funded by the Labour Government?" they were asked.
"Well, well," Mitchell replied.
Just 200 more beds the Government said, not 800.
"I think what we're doing is we're re-staking our commitment as the incoming Government to get that delivered," Mitchell said.
Stuff
www.newshub.co.nz
if you have kids in school, or are interested in education, I'd recommend listening to an interview with Tim O'Connor (Auckland Grammar School headmaster). A good listen
View: https://open.spotify.com/episode/72wO4u8ZhxbRjVGlbwLqwT?si=SmQZ6ptITJuuGQEAiji4Tw
View: https://open.spotify.com/episode/72wO4u8ZhxbRjVGlbwLqwT?si=SmQZ6ptITJuuGQEAiji4Tw
My old headmaster (he was our Rector then) at PNBHS. Good man
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
- Thread starter
- #8,493
Negative everything media playing the man rather than the ball.No matter which of the two main parties are in power. It probably happens with the smaller parties when they have ministers.
One thing you can guarantee is they will make a statement on some figures. Then we get is that a total or additional?
We get it with additional/new policemen, doctors or teachers.
Mark Mitchell sounds like he's doing a who is on first routine.
"Are the 810 new beds, are they on top of the 500 already being built at Waikeria?" the Government was asked.
"No, no," Mitchell replied.
"So, you're only doing 200 extra beds, not 800 extra beds?" the Government was asked.
"No, there's an extra 800 beds going into the system," Luxon said
"But 600 of them were funded by the Labour Government?" they were asked.
"Well, well," Mitchell replied.
Just 200 more beds the Government said, not 800.
"I think what we're doing is we're re-staking our commitment as the incoming Government to get that delivered," Mitchell said.
Stuff
Where’s the great anaysis about the actual policy?
There was widespread support to lock up more criminals at the election because lowering the prison population was an abject failure.
This can’t be right because the likes of Clint Smith was saying that Brown was working with the government in a neo-lib plot to privatise the ports ready for sale. Wait now for him and other left wing commentators to now claim this as a victory against the privatisation plans of the government. Forget the fact that there’s no evidence the POAL were every going to be sold.
www.nzherald.co.nz
Mayor Wayne Brown bins long-term lease for Port of Auckland, sticks with status quo
The Auckland Mayor earlier warned that the 'manure hits the fan' if nothing changed.
Isn't Clint Smith talking about this. "The Govt passing a law prohibiting the city council from providing financial support to the water entity."This can’t be right because the likes of Clint Smith was saying that Brown was working with the government in a neo-lib plot to privatise the ports ready for sale. Wait now for him and other left wing commentators to now claim this as a victory against the privatisation plans of the government. Forget the fact that there’s no evidence the POAL were every going to be sold.
Mayor Wayne Brown bins long-term lease for Port of Auckland, sticks with status quo
The Auckland Mayor earlier warned that the 'manure hits the fan' if nothing changed.
Or was that just a general smear?
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
TikTok King, I think he calls himself.
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Victor Communications was asked by the Maritime Union to write a report on the impact of outsourcing the POAL operations. Clint Smith has then repeatedly used the report in his articles/blogs to defend his POV of a prospective sale. What’s laughable is that Smith wrote the report in his role as a director of Victor Communications.
It’s like someone writing a report on the possible sale of the Auckland Harbour Bridge without any evidence backing it up and then quoting that report as their evidence in a blog saying it was for sale.
This seems like a very weak dig.
Why can't someone use their own report to defend their position? Unless of course the report is complete bogus, then sure hit away.
It looks like there was a proposal to explore privatisation of port operations.
The Post
www.thepost.co.nz
Last edited:
