Well, that's just silly.I want a tax cut even though I'm on a low threshold. Look at it this way. The less tax everyone pays, the less money, this and any other Govt has to waste.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Well, that's just silly.I want a tax cut even though I'm on a low threshold. Look at it this way. The less tax everyone pays, the less money, this and any other Govt has to waste.
Asset sales here we come. As if that wasn't the agenda all along. Seen it all before - it's happening through Wayne Brown too.Jeez, wouldn’t mind someone a bit more neutral than bill english to head the inquiry into kainga ora spending.
Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
Can see grants going for Maori and Pacific students as a review is about to commence. The ones that Shane Reti benefited from by the looks. At least it would be consistent with the hypocrisy from their leader.
except y'know, healthcare, education, infrastructure, defence, police, navy, customs, hospitals, roads, civil defense, water care, investment etc etc - no waste there deanI want a tax cut even though I'm on a low threshold. Look at it this way. The less tax everyone pays, the less money, this and any other Govt has to waste.
Juju will probably find some comic value out of that.Newshub's been leaked financial statements showing all 16 polytechs are essentially broke.
The worst are Whitireia and WelTec, which are $28 million in deficit. Waikato Institute of Technology is $22.5m in the red, Open Polytechnic is not far behind on $22m and Toi Ohomai is nearly $21m. The deficit at all 16 polytechnics totals more than $185m.
"That is absolutely correct. That is a result mainly of the unified funding scheme that the previous Government brought in," Simmonds said.
Leaked docs reveal horror financial position for polytechs, insiders spill beans on 's**tshow' meeting with minister
"Every campus, every office, is cut to the bone and staff have left in droves."www.newshub.co.nz
BRUTAL.
That was hardly a secret. That was one of the key rationales for setting it up in the first place, which isn’t even complete yet, and now won’t be.Newshub's been leaked financial statements showing all 16 polytechs are essentially broke.
The worst are Whitireia and WelTec, which are $28 million in deficit. Waikato Institute of Technology is $22.5m in the red, Open Polytechnic is not far behind on $22m and Toi Ohomai is nearly $21m. The deficit at all 16 polytechnics totals more than $185m.
"That is absolutely correct. That is a result mainly of the unified funding scheme that the previous Government brought in," Simmonds said.
Leaked docs reveal horror financial position for polytechs, insiders spill beans on 's**tshow' meeting with minister
"Every campus, every office, is cut to the bone and staff have left in droves."www.newshub.co.nz
BRUTAL.
Don’t tell me that after banging on about the spend on consultants the new Govt is employing Sir Bill as a consultant and then tries to sell it as independent.Jeez, wouldn’t mind someone a bit more neutral than bill english to head the inquiry into kainga ora spending.
I know. It would be like setting up an "independent" Tax Working Group headed by Michael Cullen (who lost an election on a CPT policy) to investigate whether NZ should have a Capital Gains Tax.Don’t tell me that after banging on about the spend on consultants the new Govt is employing Sir Bill as a consultant and then tries to sell it as independent.
The hypocrisy beggars belief
Not if you care about wasting money. Would be much better off in your pocket deciding how you spend it.Well, that's just silly.
I'll remind you , this lot has only got in. They haven't had six years to fritter away billions. They may well do. The last lot did.except y'know, healthcare, education, infrastructure, defence, police, navy, customs, hospitals, roads, civil defense, water care, investment etc etc - no waste there dean
View attachment 4763
We're doomed
Yeah, but the incoming government aren't doing that either - their 3 water plan is to kick it down the road for a few more years (source: ministry official)The previous government committed NZ to building a ferry terminal in Wellington designed to last 100 years but, by NZ Rails own admission, will be under water in half that time. Unless it’s been decided to repurpose it as submarine pens, it seems a multi-billion dollar waste of money to me.
The same as 3 Waters was. Scotland went down the same path as us to centralise their water and it was supposed to get them better water quality. The designer of their system is the same gentleman who wrote the original 3 Waters report. Problem is, instead of improving their water system, it’s worse with almost twice the number of boil water days than NZ has yet Scotland has a similar population as NZ.
Why instead of spending billions of dollars so the government can acquire assets which are already publicly owned and then spending billions more upgrading the systems, instead save the money buying the assets and give the money to the councils the upgrade their systems? Instead of spending money buying the assets, use that money on public transport, eduction, health, welfare, social housing, cleaning waterways or hundreds of needs NZ has.
So rates rise to $20k a year?Nationals 3 waters solution - basically keeping it how it is but drive higher standards:
National Government will set and enforce strict water quality standards and require councils to invest in the ongoing maintenance and replacement of their vital water infrastructure, while keeping control of the assets that their ratepayers have paid for.
National will:
- Repeal Three Waters and scrap the four co-governed mega-entities
- Restore council ownership and control
- Set strict rules for water quality and investment in infrastructure
- Ensure water services are financially sustainable
“Under National, councils will be required to demonstrate a clear plan to deliver ongoing investment in water infrastructure. Those plans will need to be approved by the Minister of Local Government.
“While water quality regulator Taumata Arowai will set strict standards for water quality, National will establish a Water Infrastructure Regulator within the Commerce Commission to set and enforce standards for long-term water infrastructure investment.
“Councils will be required to ringfence money for water infrastructure and not spend it on other services instead.
If you're worried about the middle spare a thought for the poor sods at the bottom.- Labour increased the top tax rate to 39%
- Increased the trust tax rate
- Never increased the tax bands with inflation, forcing people into paying higher tax
- Introduced interest deductibility tax
- Extended the brightline tax form 2 to 10 years
- Increased the petrol taxes, smoking taxes, alcohol taxes, ute taxes, etc, etc
Why, with a HUGE increase in new tax sources, does government need so much?
Why can’t we have some tax relief for middle NZers?
Someone working 40 hours on minimum wage is almost in the middle now with lack of tax band indexing to inflation, isn’t it?If you're worried about the middle spare a thought for the poor sods at the bottom.
On your Waiheke mansion that’s a decrease isn’t it?So rates rise to $20k a year?
You do understand how progressive tax works right?Someone working 40 hours on minimum wage is almost in the middle now with lack of tax band indexing to inflation, isn’t it?
They would earn $47k and $48k jump’s them from the 17% to 30% tax rate. That just getting hammered!
A minimum wage worker doing an hours overtime a week thumped with 30% tax. No wonder they can’t get ahead. To me minimum wage should be on minimum tax rate - 10% not 30%
I suggest you read the business case as the investment would have had a positive impact upon the wider economy.The ferry cost is uneconomic and will not deliver benefits for the $125 per year it will cost my family
Better the rich landlords pay it than hammering the workers with more tax!
The numbers can be pointed in what ever directionI suggest you read the business case as the investment would have had a positive impact upon the wider economy.