Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com

It is not a year out. Tenants are notified of an approximate date a few months out, then get three weeks notice of when the house or unit will be complete. That three week notice is triggered by the developer in writing. Should they not hit that date, penalties are harsh, so it hardly ever happens.
Lol so you think you can cancel existing tenancies and relocate with 3 weeks notice? Even dumber
 
It is not a year out. Tenants are notified of an approximate date a few months out, then get three weeks notice of when the house or unit will be complete. That three week notice is triggered by the developer in writing. Should they not hit that date, penalties are harsh, so it hardly ever happens.
According to your process, the 200 homes will likely have a tenant(s) allocated - they just haven't finalized the tenancy or taken residency of the property?
 
According to your process, the 200 homes will likely have a tenant(s) allocated - they just haven't finalized the tenancy or taken residency of the property?

Shows a complete lack of understanding. They arent numbers, its people. They arent warehoused in a storage shed, waiting to get moved into a house. They have lives and families and shit.
 
According to your process, the 200 homes will likely have a tenant(s) allocated - they just haven't finalized the tenancy or taken residency of the property?
Yes. They will have tenants allocated, usually those most in need or those moving in whose existing KO property may be identified for redevelopment, either community renewal or a smaller infill type development or demolition.
 
Yes. They will have tenants allocated, usually those most in need or those moving in whose existing KO property may be identified for redevelopment, either community renewal or a smaller infill type development or demolition.
So not actually empty. You knew this yet still agreed KO weren't doing their job. Lol
#salty
 
The KO vacancy report shows a different picture. Bishop simply wants to sink KO.

View attachment 4919
Seems reasonable that there might be some rolling lag between new builds being completed and being tenanted.
Seems a good portion of the vacant housing is under repair or about to be and a number to be demo'd for redevelopment.

KO should get carte blanche until the social housing stock numbers are at a reasonable level. They are doing a good job.
Sorry but I said that there were just under 4,000 houses vacant and the report you've shown says that there was 3,964 state houses vacant.... seems to me that it doesn't show a "different picture".
 
Cool. What about jobs and school. Moving times etc.

The ADF covers all expenses and costs, accom on both sides of the move, and its still a complete nightmare. Why? Cascading dominoes..
You really are in dreamland. Those in greatest need, the top of the list don't come from private sector rentals EVER. They come from their cars, motel if they are lucky or a relatives garage or tent in the backyard. You have no idea what you are talking about.
 
You really are in dreamland. Those in greatest need, the top of the list don't come from private sector rentals EVER. They come from their cars, motel if they are lucky or a relatives garage or tent in the backyard. You have no idea what you are talking about.
whose talking about “those in greatest need”? Where was that mentioned in comments about overall vacancy rates?
 
Technically yes. But not really if there is a tenant allocated to the property.
It is yes. Houses are not left empty until it suits the tenant. There will be no tenants coming directly from the private sector.
They are empty because KO is not doing their job properly, that is the issue. Meanwhile, those desperately in need of those places are unable to access them.
 
Back
Top Bottom