Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

Because they’re a business (“in the trade”), they would pay tax on the income in the same way a shop would pay tax on their sales. Because they flip the houses before the sale is finalized, they would get caught up by the Brightline requirements.
You can say that flippers pay tax until your blue in the face Mike but it doesn’t support the CGT agenda so he will be posting the same misinformation again next month…
 
Well it should be about equivalent remuneration regardless of gender, not whatever that name and shame report is claiming. "Tool for promoting an a gender", Roberts was on a roll.
If in New Zealand woman get paid less for doing the same job to the same standard as men then surely, in this Neoliberal environment we find ourselves in, businesses would hire more women and increase their profits accordingly?
 
You can say that flippers pay tax until your blue in the face Mike but it doesn’t support the CGT agenda so he will be posting the same misinformation again next month…
Which then raises some interesting points….. will a CGT require flippers to pay tax twice…. The new CGT and the existing income tax (from the Brightline requirements)?

Why should a landlord have to pay up too 39% tax on the capital gain but a company holding the same property for the same time only have to pay 28% company tax?
 
The fall out from this bullshit is massive. Birmingham has to pay nearly 1B to cleaners who sued to get paid as much as sanitation workers. So the pay went down for sanitation workers to pay out the regular council cleaners. So they guy who gets up at 4am and does a 12hr manual labor shift has to subsise the part time cleaner. The result? Not enough sanitation workers and the ones that are there are on strike. Garbage is piling up which is a human health hazard.
 
The fall out from this bullshit is massive. Birmingham has to pay nearly 1B to cleaners who sued to get paid as much as sanitation workers. So the pay went down for sanitation workers to pay out the regular council cleaners. So they guy who gets up at 4am and does a 12hr manual labor shift has to subsise the part time cleaner. The result? Not enough sanitation workers and the ones that are there are on strike. Garbage is piling up which is a human health hazard.
That's a schemozzle alright, but on the other hand, why should a cleaner who gets up at 4am to do 12 hours manual labour subsidise a garbo?
 
Physical ability.

Gladys can wipe down a counter for 4hrs a day, she cant hoist waste onto a truck for 12...
What if Gladys is a league player doing a rubbish run for fitness? What if Gladys is a league player keeping fit mopping floors and vacuuming? Ever been on the end of an industrial floor polisher? You work up a sweat mate.
 
Last edited:
What if Gladys is a league player doing a rubbish run for fitness? What if Gladys is a league player keeping fit mopping floors and vacuuming? Ever been on the end of an industrial floor polisher? You work up a sweat mate.
Supply and demand isn’t it?

Why should a bank CEO earn more than me running my small business?

It isn’t really fair is it? I want my pay equity and I want it now!
 
Quite a few studies done on why women tend to lean more towards the nurturing and care fields
Yeah it's an interesting side question. Spent a bit of time in dementia wards with my alzheimic mother. The elderly men often prefer toileting etc to be done by a male aide, rather than a female, but it's hard to get men to fill the positions, the shit wages don't help.
 
Last edited:
Yeah it's an interesting side question. Spent a bit of time in dementia wards with my alzheimic mother. The elderly men often prefer toileting etc to be done by a male aide, rather than a female, bit it's hard to get men to fill the positions, the shit wages don't help.
So would it be fair to pay the men more due to being more in demand? Male teachers?
 
    Nobody is reading this thread right now.
Back
Top Bottom