Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

Healthy homes is relatively simple or else there are exemptions if it’s impractical to meet them?

How can an a/c unit, a few fans and some insulation take 12 months to do?
Assuming the worst-case scenario that the units don't comply with most of the HHS requirements:

Pensioner flats wouldn't have a large lounge/kitchen/dining area (assuming it's one space) so $1500 per AC unit.
$500 per unit for supply and install of rangehood.
$300 per unit for bathroom ventilation.
$1500 per unit for ceiling insulation.
$1500 per unit for underfloor insulation.

So say $6000 per unit to upgrade to the healthy homes standards (and they should be able to get a much better "bulk deal" over 50 units).

50 units in total so $300K to upgrade all of them. There's no way it's uneconomic to upgrade them compared to demolishing and rebuilding them (50 units @ 60m² per unit @ $3,000 per unit equals $9,000,000).

Consider this, at $3,000 per meter, they're demolishing 50 units and supplying one new 100m² unit for the same price of upgrading them.

The units may have reached their economic "use by date" but the trust is only using the healthy homes requirements as a feeble excuse in my opinion.
 
The government says the current law “isn’t working”. The question needs to be asked…. not working for their backers (I.e the employers) or the workers?

Dumb move as far as I’m concerned.

OMG, I’ve just realised I’m becoming more like @MaybeTop8 everyday….. soon I’ll be looking for Atlas Network with every government announcement.
 
The government says the current law “isn’t working”. The question needs to be asked…. not working for their backers (I.e the employers) or the workers?

Dumb move as far as I’m concerned.


I’d particularly question whether this needs to be passed under urgency. Reading between the lines I would say their budget numbers aren’t looking great.
 
The government says the current law “isn’t working”. The question needs to be asked…. not working for their backers (I.e the employers) or the workers?

Dumb move as far as I’m concerned.

Because pay equity claims are a disgrace.

1. The "gender pay gap" bullshit stat in NZ is 8.2%. Women work 8.3% less
2. Since the aggregated data isnt like for like jobs it means part time female employees are forcing pay parity with full time male employee.

and most importantly
3. Pay equity claims are grievance based politics freed from market constraints that decimate everything it touches.

The reporting on these matters doesnt get amplified because it goes against the accepted narrative. Just like Spain's complete grid collapse thanks to renewables.

 
Because pay equity claims are a disgrace.

1. The "gender pay gap" bullshit stat in NZ is 8.2%. Women work 8.3% less
2. Since the aggregated data isnt like for like jobs it means part time female employees are forcing pay parity with full time male employee.

and most importantly
3. Pay equity claims are grievance based politics freed from market constraints that decimate everything it touches.

The reporting on these matters doesnt get amplified because it goes against the accepted narrative. Just like Spain's complete grid collapse thanks to renewables.

More conspiracy frank
 
More conspiracy frank
The conspiracy is saying woman get paid less than men. Just some left agenda item that nobody ever knows of any females that are actually paid less.

Show me one job where that’s the case for the same job?

It simply isn’t in the real world or else employers would employ all the females because they are cheaper…
 
The conspiracy is saying woman get paid less than men. Just some left agenda item that nobody ever knows of any females that are actually paid less.

Show me one job where that’s the case for the same job?

It simply isn’t in the real world or else employers would employ all the females because they are cheaper…
For once in your life do some actual factual research. Please.
 
Back
Top Bottom