Yeah that’s was my line of thinkingAgreed, his defence is up there.
Picking apart his game you would assume that taking the line on and playing up in the face of the defence....putting his body on the line to get balls away....would be one area all halves could do more of.
But I suspect it is about doing Websters game plan, while that is pure conjecture on my part, Websters game plan is very simple, boring, predictable, completions....kick chase....completions.....kick chase.
We saw how Metcalf committed himself to that game plan, how it killed all of Metcalfs creativity and took his running game out of Warriors attack for more than seven rounds of clunky, no instinctive, talentless attack.
But Metcalf stuck to Webster ball strictly, despite the criticism that came his way during the early rounds for having zero creativity.
We also saw how once Metcalf had Websters kick chase rinse and repeat down pat the trainer wheels were taken off by Webster and Metcalf started running again...boom our attack is starting to click.
So this is pure conjecture on my part, but TMM probably didn't do the same as Metcalf, when TMM had the keys he played what was in front of him right away, he played eyes up at every opportunity.....which is why I said originally that I wonder if TMM made the right noises when asked the hard questions by the coach about his commitment to the game plan vs his own personal style of play.
Kick and chase, rinse and repeat is not really TMM's game.
Tmm doesn’t like ( at times) Webster game plan.