Warriorsitsouryear
🌱
Rookie Warrior
Going on what Webster has said a few times - Luke needs reps... and as we have a bye after the Panthers game - I would look at him starting after the bye. We need a 7 that can kick. TMM has stated he is not great at kicking and 3 years at the Warriors - it is still not of the standard we need ... therefore having it as a work-on before the Panthers game - won't change too much. TMM has been great at what he can do - but with our pack and 9 so dominant - our game plan suits a kicking 7 of the Boyd, even Fogarty mould - for field position. Metcalf has a longer and more accurate kick than TMM - and even weak defensive halves can be kept with a bodyguard (Tonnie Carrol Mould for Lockyer).My position is that if we don't play him this weekend why didn't we agree with the Dragons reported according to rumours early 2026 release request. It would be really poor form of the Warriors to insist on keeping him for 2026 only as injury cover for TMM and CHT. So bad form that it would be poor corporate values.
He is in my humble new to league mind a clearly better half back than TMM and there should not be a quandry for Webster about who is better between them..
If TMM is viewed as being better than Luke then give Luke to the Dragons now so he can play. Life is short and careers are short.
PS sure TMM looked good against the Broncos. but the Dragons were terribad and that match is not an indicator of anything germane.
PPS I am not invested in this to a great deal. So will support whoever puts on the jumper.
At the end of the day - I support Webby's decision as he also knows what is happening on the inside with everyone - things that we will never be privy too.