General The Boyd vs Metcalf debate

Who is your no.7

  • Team Metcalf

    Votes: 7 7.8%
  • Team Boyd

    Votes: 83 92.2%

  • Total voters
    90
Inruin is always on about how Webster needs to be more ruthless, which I tend to roll my eyes at, but this is next level ruthlessness.

seems to be the club has capitalised on a chance to replace a slightly temperamental, expensive and very injury prone 7 with a lower maintenance, cheaper and more durable model. The head turning boyfriend meme 100% applies.

Boyd has earned his contract (when it's announced) nothing against him.

But think back to October 2025 when the Metcalf contract was announced, wedding in Queenstown, committed to NZ, committed to the warriors, loved the support the club gave him.

Tanah Boyd was too good for NSW cup, but very iffy in first grade, not bad, but not a long term solution.

https://www.warriors.kiwi/news/2025/10/23/staying-right-here---metcalf-recommits-until-2028/ it was a further two years - which haven't even kicked in yet! 2027 and 2028 would have been his big Money years, maybe the 2026 year was re-done with all the money freed up from Tohu, Walker etc. And the Warriors won't have to pay them.

Now only 6 months later, bloke can't get a look in, if he wants to stay gotta play 6, despite the current 6 playing the house down and him repeatedly saying that's not his go.

Metcalf was here when Te Maire Martin outplayed Shaun Johnson as a 7 every which way during the middle of 2024, as soon as Johnson would return from injury that year, the team would slump. But SJ was the man, and TMM wasn't, just was what it was.

Now LM thought he was going to be the Man and get that level of leeway, to return to his position when fit, but what have you done for us lately son.

The club know he's not wired like Marata Niukore, play him on the left edge, right edge, starting middle, bench middle, left right out - doesn't matter - the fortnightly checks were healthy, happy to cruise along until a new deal comes at another club. They knew what LM reaction would be, but its the club publicly acceding to his demands not the other way around - well played Cappy and co.

....

The one hole in this theory, is what in the fuck are the warriors planning on spending their cap space on, every expensive player seems to be leaving, you have to spend it somewhere!

My guess is that the club didn't want to look like patsies. The Warriors would look weak if they let a contracted player break contract coz they feel like it....

Metcalf could have avoided all of this by doing it all in private allowing a media announcement about a compassionate release.

So I think probably that the Warriors didn't want to just let a contracted player walk out the door coz they had a tanty.

And I also think that the club privately will be planning to be well rid of him this season, ideally after the storm has died down a bit.
He feels poorly advised. But then also tbh it’s not him that’s said much, and Fonzie on the TWL pod is right that he has been messed around a bit at other clubs, so can kind of get it if he’s 27 and hasn’t ever managed to really start his career and he’s back out of the team. I think we can give the bloke the benefit of the doubt as a human and move on
 
Huge metcalf fan myself as i love that "hunger" he shows within a game when on the feild last year. But i don't really get why people would want him to "fight" for his role in NSW grade or want him at six. Or that he even should be playing in NSW cup right now as some kind of vindication (blocking Jett from improving there).

1. I weirdly think he was a lot better at 7 than he ever was at 6. CHT has been light years better at 6 reguardless (defense, left foot boot, connection on that side). If CHT is a option he should not be getting that spot.
2. fighting it out in NSW grade would mean we'd have 900k just sitting there in reserve when we have areas we could upgrade on.
3. Making him play in NSW grade blocks out a player who the warriors want to keep. And stops him from moving on quicker. If we want injury cover for 7 then we still have TMM this year.

Surely him walking out is by far the best case for the warriors. And the sooner the better so we can use the money to negatiate with now to players off contract. I.E Averillo as a center/winger, Ray stone/Jolliffe/ as a barney replacement, Watson, etc.
Although emotionaly it would be more satisfying to have him play in NSW grade, or grind it out. Just moving him on quickly IMO is just so much better for the club's future.
 
Do I get an apology from those of you who gave me shit when I highlighted how poor Metcalfs body language was pre-match when the cameras showed him next to Tanah Boyd about a month ago?
If you were one of the very, very few who, last year, warned against giving him a big contract upgrade because he is injury prone, then I’ll give you a gold medal.
On a screen image only, though, I’m a bit short at the moment.
 
He feels poorly advised. But then also tbh it’s not him that’s said much, and Fonzie on the TWL pod is right that he has been messed around a bit at other clubs, so can kind of get it if he’s 27 and hasn’t ever managed to really start his career and he’s back out of the team. I think we can give the bloke the benefit of the doubt as a human and move on

Been said a lot, but my issue is the way he went about it all.

Had he handled this better we wouldn't even know about it.

He had options. That is what grates with most people I would suggest.
 
Huge metcalf fan myself as i love that "hunger" he shows within a game when on the feild last year. But i don't really get why people would want him to "fight" for his role in NSW grade or want him at six. Or that he even should be playing in NSW cup right now as some kind of vindication (blocking Jett from improving there).

1. I weirdly think he was a lot better at 7 than he ever was at 6. CHT has been light years better at 6 reguardless (defense, left foot boot, connection on that side). If CHT is a option he should not be getting that spot.
2. fighting it out in NSW grade would mean we'd have 900k just sitting there in reserve when we have areas we could upgrade on.
3. Making him play in NSW grade blocks out a player who the warriors want to keep. And stops him from moving on quicker. If we want injury cover for 7 then we still have TMM this year.

Surely him walking out is by far the best case for the warriors. And the sooner the better so we can use the money to negatiate with now to players off contract. I.E Averillo as a center/winger, Ray stone/Jolliffe/ as a barney replacement, Watson, etc.
Although emotionaly it would be more satisfying to have him play in NSW grade, or grind it out. Just moving him on quickly IMO is just so much better for the club's future.

I was in favour rather than sitting on the bench doing nothing

But Now.

NSW cup benefits no one.

He needs to find a new club and get on with his life
 
Huge metcalf fan myself as i love that "hunger" he shows within a game when on the feild last year. But i don't really get why people would want him to "fight" for his role in NSW grade or want him at six. Or that he even should be playing in NSW cup right now as some kind of vindication (blocking Jett from improving there).

1. I weirdly think he was a lot better at 7 than he ever was at 6. CHT has been light years better at 6 reguardless (defense, left foot boot, connection on that side). If CHT is a option he should not be getting that spot.
2. fighting it out in NSW grade would mean we'd have 900k just sitting there in reserve when we have areas we could upgrade on.
3. Making him play in NSW grade blocks out a player who the warriors want to keep. And stops him from moving on quicker. If we want injury cover for 7 then we still have TMM this year.

Surely him walking out is by far the best case for the warriors. And the sooner the better so we can use the money to negatiate with now to players off contract. I.E Averillo as a center/winger, Ray stone/Jolliffe/ as a barney replacement, Watson, etc.
Although emotionaly it would be more satisfying to have him play in NSW grade, or grind it out. Just moving him on quickly IMO is just so much better for the club's future.
I’m aligned to this. Not much value in him playing cup and we want the likes of Hanson, Cleary, Thompson getting experience in cup. I also don’t think people quite realise how much different a 6 and a 7 in nrl gets paid. And metcalf is 27 and making up for lost time in his short career, I do get the desire to be the 7 and earn a packet

And yeah my mind went straight to TMM also, does he get another random one year extension if he’s happy in Auckland and would ideally rather stay than move his family to the north of England
 
I can’t help but not enjoy this whole situation, but somehow feel it will be the best for all parties.

I had the pleasure of meeting Luke and chatting to him for some time at the Canberra game before his comeback and he was an approachable, affable young guy who clearly was passionate about playing footie. He clearly has big dreams, which I admired, but clearly that was only to play 7 and drive a team around the park. I don’t begrudge him for wanting to chase that dream if that’s the case. No hate on the guy from me. I had just really hoped he would be that guy for us, even though I often had my doubts about his ability as a true 7. He clearly loved it here and seemed to have a tight bond with many players, so am hoping it doesn’t rock the ship too much. Can only wish the guy the best.

On Boyd, I really admire the guys approach and work ethic to just knuckle down and nail this opportunity. When he signed I was hopeful he would kick on with us to reach his potential after recalling him in the AUS schoolboys jersey that tore the Jnr Kiwis up able ago. He 100% has my support now, and imo is a true 7 that suits our style of play currently.

Chitty - I think his form also threw a spanner in the works for LM. As it shows when LM got game time at 6 how important a strong defensive 6 is. Will be interested to see his next move.

The Club - I wouldn’t be surprised if Robbo has had some significant involvement here as well. Just comes across as the type of guy who doesn’t fk about when something is having a negative influence on culture.

Professional sport can be a ruthless business sometimes.
 
I’m aligned to this. Not much value in him playing cup and we want the likes of Hanson, Cleary, Thompson getting experience in cup. I also don’t think people quite realise how much different a 6 and a 7 in nrl gets paid. And metcalf is 27 and making up for lost time in his short career, I do get the desire to be the 7 and earn a packet

And yeah my mind went straight to TMM also, does he get another random one year extension if he’s happy in Auckland and would ideally rather stay than move his family to the north of England
Yeah but pay difference isn't an issue in this case? Metcalf is the highest paid back at the club whatever happens.
 
Been said a lot, but my issue is the way he went about it all.

Had he handled this better we wouldn't even know about it.

He had options. That is what grates with most people I would suggest.
Yeah I’m more happy to give benefit of the doubt and blame the agent. NRL players aren’t always the highest IQ bunch, and they pay agents to look out for them, I can see how he was told this is the best path forward and agreed to it as it’s not his area of expertise
 
  • Like
Reactions: j_p
I was in favour rather than sitting on the bench doing nothing

But Now.

NSW cup benefits no one.

He needs to find a new club and get on with his life
NSW Cup benefits us hugely. He is not on 900k this year, he is on far less and he is our FG quality depth if we have an injury. We want him match fit and confident because dollars to donuts he will be used if available this year. The best scenario is him fronting up with a great attitude for the club that has backed him. Hopefully he can find a gig for next year promptly so it is off his mind, but I think it is short-sighted to be eager to part ways in 2026.

This all rests on his maturity really.
 
NSW Cup benefits us hugely. He is not on 900k this year, he is on far less and he is our FG quality depth if we have an injury. We want him match fit and confident because dollars to donuts he will be used if available this year. The best scenario is him fronting up with a great attitude for the club that has backed him. Hopefully he can find a gig for next year promptly so it is off his mind, but I think it is short-sighted to be eager to part ways in 2026.

This all rests on his maturity really.

You think he will do a 180 and agree to play cup?


Wishful thinking
 
Yeah I’m more happy to give benefit of the doubt and blame the agent. NRL players aren’t always the highest IQ bunch, and they pay agents to look out for them, I can see how he was told this is the best path forward and agreed to it as it’s not his area of expertise

You give him way too much credit imo.

He knew this playbook from the SJ toy throwing incident, this is spookily similar.

Also he is not some grunt middle forward, he is a self proclaimed student of the game. Certainly he is intelligent, there is no doubt about that and I think he is very savvy as well, this is playing out exactly how he wanted imo.

Look at all the insights us mere plebs have thrown up in this scenario, and we are outsiders, mere fans, this guy understands the internal workings of the machine.
 
Okay guys serious downside now that Dearden is injured there is a slight chance tanah could get the qld call and now our other good half back has split hahahaha.

Wonder if metcalf would return for that
 
Back
Top Bottom