Post Match Raiders v Warriors - [Round 1, 2025]

Raiders vs Warriors

Raiders

30 - 8

MATCH COMPLETE

Allegiant Stadium

02 Mar 2025

Warriors

Match Stats

Raiders Warriors
5 Tries 2
5 / 6 Conversions 0 / 2
0/0 Field Goals 0/0
0/0 2P Field Goals 0/0
4 Try Assists 2
Raiders Warriors
50% Possession 50%
13 / 30 Set Completion 11 / 30
50 Time in Opposition Half 50
1638 Metres Gained 1379
1 Dropouts 0
6 Dummy Half Runs 6
17 / 580 Kicks/Kick Metres 22 / 667
0 40/20 0
0 20/40 0
17 Offloads 10
1 1 on 1 Steals 1
6 Line Breaks 2
4 Line Break Assists 2
6 Support Play 5
Raiders Warriors
13 / 30 Set Completion 11 / 30
7 Penalties (Conceded) 5
1 Set Restarts 3
12 Errors 11

Player Stats

# Raiders T Pts TA LB TB OFF Ta MT IT Pos DR K KM M E P
1 K. Weekes 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 20 0 0 0m 109m 0 0
2 S. Tamale 0 0 0 2 13 1 2 0 0 19 0 1 0m 201m 2 1
3 M. Timoko 1 4 0 1 5 2 17 1 2 13 0 0 0m 116m 0 0
4 S. Kris 2 8 0 1 5 0 14 0 2 17 0 0 0m 124m 2 0
5 X. Savage 2 8 1 1 9 2 6 3 0 23 1 0 0m 210m 2 1
6 E. Strange 0 0 3 0 2 1 20 1 1 30 0 2 58m 27m 1 1
7 J. Fogarty 0 10 0 0 1 0 27 1 2 61 0 14 522m 16m 3 0
8 C. Horsburgh 0 0 0 0 1 3 29 3 0 20 0 0 0m 109m 1 0
9 T. Starling 0 0 0 1 6 0 30 2 0 95 3 0 0m 119m 0 0
10 J. Tapine 0 0 0 0 2 3 22 5 0 18 0 0 0m 140m 0 1
11 H. Young 0 0 0 0 6 2 34 4 2 22 1 0 0m 130m 0 2
12 Z. Hosking 0 0 0 0 1 0 41 0 2 10 0 0 0m 60m 0 1
16 J. Papali'i 0 0 0 0 2 1 23 0 3 12 0 0 0m 96m 1 0
13 M. Smithies 0 0 0 0 1 1 34 2 0 16 0 0 0m 108m 0 0
14 O. Pattie 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 1 2 20 1 0 0m 3m 0 0
15 S. Sasagi 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 4 0 0 0m 32m 0 0
17 A. Mariota 0 0 0 0 1 1 13 1 0 5 0 0 0m 38m 0 0
# Warriors T Pts TA LB TB OFF Ta MT IT Pos DR K KM M E P
1 C. Nicoll-Klokstad 0 0 0 0 3 2 5 3 0 41 1 0 0m 84m 2 1
2 T. Tuaupiki 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 2 0 18 0 0 0m 113m 0 1
3 A. Leiataua 0 0 0 0 3 0 10 5 0 16 0 1 5m 124m 0 0
4 A. Pompey 0 0 1 0 2 2 7 3 1 18 0 0 0m 122m 1 0
5 R. Tuivasa-Sheck 1 4 0 1 3 0 4 3 2 28 0 0 0m 189m 1 0
6 C. Harris-Tavita 0 0 1 0 2 2 20 5 4 50 0 9 283m 44m 0 1
7 L. Metcalf 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 6 3 47 1 9 343m 32m 2 0
8 J. Fisher-Harris 0 0 0 0 4 0 34 1 3 15 0 0 0m 119m 1 1
9 W. Egan 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 5 2 121 3 0 0m 41m 0 0
15 J. Ford 0 0 0 0 1 1 32 4 2 12 1 0 0m 92m 1 0
11 K. Capewell 1 4 0 1 0 0 30 11 3 7 0 0 0m 37m 1 0
12 M. Niukore 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 5 4 10 0 0 0m 62m 1 0
10 M. Barnett 0 0 0 0 2 0 38 2 3 16 0 1 6m 74m 0 0
13 E. Clark 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 1 0 20 0 0 0m 126m 1 0
14 D. Walker 0 0 0 0 2 0 22 3 0 26 0 2 30m 36m 0 0
16 D. Vaimauga 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 1 7 0 0 0m 35m 0 0
17 L. Halasima 0 0 0 0 1 1 11 0 0 6 0 0 0m 49m 0 1
 

Rate the game?

  • A+

    Votes: 2 1.4%
  • A

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • B

    Votes: 2 1.4%
  • C

    Votes: 27 18.9%
  • F-

    Votes: 112 78.3%

  • Total voters
    143
Status
Not open for further replies.

NZWarriors.com

Its not just a starting pack, its the game plan. Sticky figured us out beautifully; thats why the Raiders spent the 1st 20 dropping the ball underneath, moving our fowards and back row around tiring them out.

Our forwards are small and mobile and our back row is big and slow.

8 Barnett
9 Healey
10 Bunty
11 Laban
12 Halasima
13 Clark

14 Egan
15 Walker
16 Fish
17 Demetric
Gotta do something after todays crap performance Frank.
It all starts up front & always has.Our biggest asset was supposed to be upfront & that failed.
Also think RTS has to be the FB. We obviously lack talent in the outside backs.Have we anyone worthy of a crack on the wing?
Unfortunately our roster is shit & our youngsters are not be a fair go.
 
Its not just a starting pack, its the game plan. Sticky figured us out beautifully; thats why the Raiders spent the 1st 20 dropping the ball underneath, moving our fowards and back row around tiring them out.

Our forwards are small and mobile and our back row is big and slow.

8 Barnett
9 Healey
10 Bunty
11 Laban
12 Halasima
13 Clark

14 Egan
15 Walker
16 Fish
17 Demetric
Fish won't be benched but you got some good elements in there, including more speed, threat and size.
 
Tough watch. A couple of lucky tries from Canberra, a couple begging from us which would have flattered the score line a little more.

Feels like raiders had a plan and got away with it (pushing up in the line, slowing down ruck excessively, pushing up off the mark hard) and I don’t think they get away with any of that vs a team like Cronulla who will shred your edges if you do that, or a storm/manly/penrith who will just pepper the ball behind your line all day.

Anyway, Vegas is silly. Hope we can bounce back, we’ve got some weird combinations at the moment. Struggling to find a place for CNK in my team at this rate
I was thinking that as I was watching it too. That they were lying down alot longer than we were. Same with their line speed. And no offside penalties
I like the backline. I would go that but with Healey at 14 and Walker 17. CHT is so difficult, he offers so much promise but I believe his best position is 14, however I think Healey adds more spark on attack. So CHT for me is now our second best 14.
I like Healey at 14 however if our forwards aren't going forward it slows his running game which is his best attribute.
Gotta do something after todays crap performance Frank.
It all starts up front & always has.Our biggest asset was supposed to be upfront & that failed.
Also think RTS has to be the FB. We obviously lack talent in the outside backs.Have we anyone worthy of a crack on the wing?
Unfortunately our roster is shit & our youngsters are not be a fair go.
I think Sio Kali could be him. Looks big with some speed too. Compared to Tuaupiki who I would put at the back. Where he belongs.
 
Gotta do something after todays crap performance Frank.
It all starts up front & always has.Our biggest asset was supposed to be upfront & that failed.
Also think RTS has to be the FB. We obviously lack talent in the outside backs.Have we anyone worthy of a crack on the wing?
Unfortunately our roster is shit & our youngsters are not be a fair go.
Agree but disagree. Full team

1 TMM
2 Taine
3 CNK
4 Ali
5 RTS
6 CHT
7 Metcalf
8 Barnett
9 Healey
10 Bunty
11 Laban
12 Halasima
13 Clark

14 Egan
15 Walker
16 Fish
17 Demetric
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
    Nobody is reading this thread right now.
Back
Top Bottom