Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

You've got to wonder when National will finally grow up and learn how to have post-Election negotiations as well as Labour do. Labour have only ever had coalition arrangements with a centrist party and only confidence and supply agreements with those parties further out to the left while National seem to want to "jump into bed" with anyone "willing to get the job done".

It's actually quite sickening how quickly National will lie down for the likes of ACT and what they willing to give up/accept to form a government.
I agree largely with what you have said but to be fair, Labour have only had to negotiate once in the last 17 years and in that one they sold their soul and the country to get power. Prior to that Key negotiated well I thought, particularly with including the māori party. This Government is the first one I believe to have the cross party agreement negotiated and signed by each of them. I think that was wise given the NZFirst and ACT partners. The CoC was supposed to implode almost immediately. It's taken until basically now for some cracks to appear and that's usually what Winston does 10-12 months out from an election.
 

NZWarriors.com

I agree largely with what you have said but to be fair, Labour have only had to negotiate once in the last 17 years and in that one they sold their soul and the country to get power. Prior to that Key negotiated well I thought, particularly with including the māori party. This Government is the first one I believe to have the cross party agreement negotiated and signed by each of them. I think that was wise given the NZFirst and ACT partners. The CoC was supposed to implode almost immediately. It's taken until basically now for some cracks to appear and that's usually what Winston does 10-12 months out from an election.
Don't forget that the shining star policy of Luxon and Willis the FBT was scuppered by Winston before it got off the ground. Parliamentary process was held up for 2 months while Luxon was trying to get Winston on board. Far from smooth negotiations. Now we have a complete shambles because Luxon sold his soul because he wanted to be the PM.
Seymour vanity project the RSB has been passed and before the ink is dry everyone wants it gone. Waste of time and money and again clogging the parliamentary process.Now rumblings from Cameron Luxton who has sympathy for the greyhound fraternity.Winston will be pissed :D
 
Last edited:

The best education news in years and the media buries it​

Warning: This is a very frustrated and ranty article!​

Ani O’Brien
Nov 26, 2025


Sometimes this country feels allergic to good news, especially when that good news comes from a government our media class has decided must never be allowed a win. This week, Education Minister Erica Stanford released some of the most extraordinary education data New Zealand has seen in decades…students are making between one and two years of maths progress in just twelve weeks. It should have led every bulletin. It should have been the headline splashed across every front page. Erica Stanford should be being hoisted above shoulders and paraded through the streets as a heroine. Chris Hipkins would have thrown himself a parade if he had done anything except drive our education system into decline when he was in charge. What Stanford’s reforms are achieving is nothing short of extraordinary.


Subscribe




Education Minister Erica Stanford. Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images
But instead of covering the biggest step forward for student achievement in a generation, the media is devoting its energy to breathless reporting on activist principals and boards issuing dramatic proclamations about “giving effect to the Treaty,” as though the Government had announced some kind of education coup. Instead of being celebrated for lifting Māori education results, she is basically being called a racist.



The contrast is surreal. On one side, a data-driven success story proving that the Government’s reforms are working for all students, including Māori. On the other, political theatre from schools and equally theatrical amplification from journalists who seemed determined to turn it into the story of the day, zero f***s given about accuracy. Please note that Newstalk ZB have be the lone platform discussing this in depth and deserve to be applauded for doing their job because apparently that is a big ask.

What has made the media’s fixation even more absurd is the fact that these schools, and the journalists cheerleading them, appear to have fundamentally misunderstood, or perhaps wilfully misrepresented, the Minister’s actual position on the Treaty. Erica Stanford has been remarkably consistent and clear that the most meaningful way schools can meet the Crown’s Treaty obligations is by ensuring Māori children’s education results improve. What Stanford is doing is more than a slogan; it is the most practical, measurable, and genuinely transformative approach any Minister of Education has taken in years. If you care about Māori success, then you should care about literacy, numeracy, and structured teaching, not performative declarations that do nothing for the actual children sitting in actual classrooms right now.



Yet the media ignore that clarity entirely. They prefer the drama. They prefer to cast Stanford as somehow anti-Treaty because it fits their pre-loaded narrative. And they are only too eager to platform principals making political statements as though they were civil rights heroes instead of bureaucrats misrepresenting the truth. It is astonishing that journalists who never tire of lecturing the public about “misinformation” couldn’t muster the curiosity to read, or watch, what the Minister has actually said. The truth, inconveniently for them, is that her reforms are delivering precisely the equity gains the system has failed to produce for Māori students for years.

What Stanford is doing is of so much note that Estonia’s Education Minister Kristina Kallas is here in New Zealand looking at our reforms. She explained to Mike Hosking that what we are doing is of huge interest to education leaders in Europe and we are being watched with great interest. She also said our reforms are moving us in the right direction. By the way, Estonia is top in Europe when it comes to maths.

And it is no wonder we are the talk of the town, the results of the Government’s maths acceleration trial for year 7 and 8 students needing extra support were nothing short of exceptional. Students who were already a year behind made extraordinary progress, up to two full years in twelve weeks for those in in-person tutoring, and a full year for those simply experiencing the new structured curriculum and hour-a-day maths. Even the control groups, with no extra intervention beyond the reformed curriculum and workbooks, made a year’s progress in the same time.

Let that sink in, the baseline reforms alone are lifting achievement at a rate this country has not seen in decades. This is the kind of rapid turnaround that educators around the world dream of. It is proof that structured teaching, quality materials, and clear expectations work and that years of ideological experimentation and educational drift have cost students dearly.

Yet where was the coverage (bar good ol’ Newstalk ZB)? Where were the longform features on the teachers delivering these results? Where were the op-eds celebrating the first real reversal of education decline in a generation? Where were the political commentators acknowledging that the Government’s reforms are not only working but working spectacularly? Instead, the media spent the day elevating schools staging symbolic protests over a Treaty issue that doesn’t even exist.

This is not just a failure of editorial judgement. It is an indictment of an ideological media ecosystem that cares more about narrative than outcomes. It is easier for journalists to amplify a political tantrum than to report on something that challenges their assumptions about this Government. It is far more comfortable to cover performative activism than to admit that structured, rigorous education, the very thing they once sneered at as “old-fashioned,”is delivering extraordinary gains for the children they claim to champion.

The behaviour of the teachers’ unions and much of the education establishment has made it very clear that they are no longer defenders of children’s learning either. They are defenders of their own comfort, ideology, and power. The moment Erica Stanford started delivering results they sulked and complained. They suddenly discovered a dozen reasons why the reforms should “slow down,” be “consulted on more,” or be “refocused around the Treaty.” Anything, absolutely anything, except acknowledging that structured teaching and clear expectations are finally lifting student achievement after years of drift.





Today on Ryan Bridge’s Newstalk ZB show, the PPTA’s Chris Abercrombie tried to downplay the maths results this week. Rather than welcoming the dramatic gains students have made, he sniffed that “we had different ways of doing it and this is another way of doing it,” before warning that an “intense focus is… resource heavy, a very resource heavy way of doing it.” It was the perfect encapsulation of a sector so wedded to its own failed methods that even unprecedented progress is treated as a threat. Never mind that the reforms are clearly working and that thousands of students, including Māori and Pasifika kids who were failed for decades, are finally catching up at lightning speed.

The unionist instinct to protect the comfortable consensus was on full display when in discussing curriculum priorities Ryan Bridge joked “you can do art at home,” and Abercrombie instantly replied, “you can do maths at home.” A breathtakingly out-of-touch comment and an extraordinary admission that the unions no longer see it as schools’ job to deliver numeracy and literacy basics. It is a crystal-clear illustration of why Erica Stanford’s reforms are needed. The sector has forgotten what school is for.

Before concluding the interview, Bridge asked whether Stanford might in fact be the best Education Minister in decades, to which Abercrombie scoffed, called it “silly,” and refused to answer. Plainly, acknowledging the truth would blow up years of union scaremongering and force him to admit that a minister outside their ideological tribe is achieving what they could not.



The education establishment don’t like the pace of change. They don’t like being asked to adopt evidence-based practice. They don’t like the focus on basics because it undermines the ideological fads they’ve spent years promoting. And most of all, they don’t like a Minister who refuses to bow to their political theatrics. The moment Stanford stepped into the portfolio with a clear agenda and the courage to push for real change, the sector reacted like a threatened cartel. Their public statements since have been little more than coded protests that they should still be running the system, despite the fact they presided over its decline.

The obsession with the Treaty is the most telling example of this ideological capture. Instead of welcoming reforms that are demonstrably improving outcomes for Māori students, the unions insist on dragging every debate back to symbolic politics. They accuse the Minister of undermining the Treaty while ignoring the obvious truth that nothing has undermined Māori educational success more than the low expectations and incoherent teaching methods they have defended for years. Their fixation on performative Treaty rhetoric has become a convenient shield, a way to dodge accountability and avoid confronting their own role in entrenching an inequitable system.

And now, faced with reforms that are finally working, they have exposed themselves as the greatest barrier to children’s success. They are not fighting for students. They are fighting to preserve a failed status quo. Only a sector terrified of losing ideological control would respond to massive academic gains by demanding that the Minister slow down.

News | Erica Stanford | MP for East Coast Bays | National Party

Erica Stanford. Photo: National Party website.
What Erica Stanford’s success has revealed is uncomfortable but unavoidable. The unions and much of the education bureaucracy have been gatekeepers, not guardians. The system has not been failing despite them, it has been failing because of them. And now that a Minister has arrived with the determination and clarity to put children, not ideology, at the centre of schooling, they are resisting with every tool they have. Their complaints are not a sign that Stanford is going too fast. They’re proof that, for the first time in years, she has the ship going in the right direction.

These results matter and will change lives. This Government’s reforms are practical, measurable, and transformative, and they deserve far more than a passing mention while the media chases politically convenient distractions.

New Zealand should be celebrating. Parents should feel hope. Teachers should feel proud. The entire country should recognise that we are finally pulling out of the nosedive.

If the media won’t tell the story, then others must. Because the truth is simple: for the first time in a long time, our education system is moving in the right direction. And that is worth more than all the activist press releases in the world.

 

The best education news in years and the media buries it​

Warning: This is a very frustrated and ranty article!​

Ani O’Brien
Nov 26, 2025


Sometimes this country feels allergic to good news, especially when that good news comes from a government our media class has decided must never be allowed a win. This week, Education Minister Erica Stanford released some of the most extraordinary education data New Zealand has seen in decades…students are making between one and two years of maths progress in just twelve weeks. It should have led every bulletin. It should have been the headline splashed across every front page. Erica Stanford should be being hoisted above shoulders and paraded through the streets as a heroine. Chris Hipkins would have thrown himself a parade if he had done anything except drive our education system into decline when he was in charge. What Stanford’s reforms are achieving is nothing short of extraordinary.


Subscribe



Education Minister Erica Stanford. Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images
But instead of covering the biggest step forward for student achievement in a generation, the media is devoting its energy to breathless reporting on activist principals and boards issuing dramatic proclamations about “giving effect to the Treaty,” as though the Government had announced some kind of education coup. Instead of being celebrated for lifting Māori education results, she is basically being called a racist.


The contrast is surreal. On one side, a data-driven success story proving that the Government’s reforms are working for all students, including Māori. On the other, political theatre from schools and equally theatrical amplification from journalists who seemed determined to turn it into the story of the day, zero f***s given about accuracy. Please note that Newstalk ZB have be the lone platform discussing this in depth and deserve to be applauded for doing their job because apparently that is a big ask.

What has made the media’s fixation even more absurd is the fact that these schools, and the journalists cheerleading them, appear to have fundamentally misunderstood, or perhaps wilfully misrepresented, the Minister’s actual position on the Treaty. Erica Stanford has been remarkably consistent and clear that the most meaningful way schools can meet the Crown’s Treaty obligations is by ensuring Māori children’s education results improve. What Stanford is doing is more than a slogan; it is the most practical, measurable, and genuinely transformative approach any Minister of Education has taken in years. If you care about Māori success, then you should care about literacy, numeracy, and structured teaching, not performative declarations that do nothing for the actual children sitting in actual classrooms right now.


Yet the media ignore that clarity entirely. They prefer the drama. They prefer to cast Stanford as somehow anti-Treaty because it fits their pre-loaded narrative. And they are only too eager to platform principals making political statements as though they were civil rights heroes instead of bureaucrats misrepresenting the truth. It is astonishing that journalists who never tire of lecturing the public about “misinformation” couldn’t muster the curiosity to read, or watch, what the Minister has actually said. The truth, inconveniently for them, is that her reforms are delivering precisely the equity gains the system has failed to produce for Māori students for years.

What Stanford is doing is of so much note that Estonia’s Education Minister Kristina Kallas is here in New Zealand looking at our reforms. She explained to Mike Hosking that what we are doing is of huge interest to education leaders in Europe and we are being watched with great interest. She also said our reforms are moving us in the right direction. By the way, Estonia is top in Europe when it comes to maths.

And it is no wonder we are the talk of the town, the results of the Government’s maths acceleration trial for year 7 and 8 students needing extra support were nothing short of exceptional. Students who were already a year behind made extraordinary progress, up to two full years in twelve weeks for those in in-person tutoring, and a full year for those simply experiencing the new structured curriculum and hour-a-day maths. Even the control groups, with no extra intervention beyond the reformed curriculum and workbooks, made a year’s progress in the same time.

Let that sink in, the baseline reforms alone are lifting achievement at a rate this country has not seen in decades. This is the kind of rapid turnaround that educators around the world dream of. It is proof that structured teaching, quality materials, and clear expectations work and that years of ideological experimentation and educational drift have cost students dearly.

Yet where was the coverage (bar good ol’ Newstalk ZB)? Where were the longform features on the teachers delivering these results? Where were the op-eds celebrating the first real reversal of education decline in a generation? Where were the political commentators acknowledging that the Government’s reforms are not only working but working spectacularly? Instead, the media spent the day elevating schools staging symbolic protests over a Treaty issue that doesn’t even exist.

This is not just a failure of editorial judgement. It is an indictment of an ideological media ecosystem that cares more about narrative than outcomes. It is easier for journalists to amplify a political tantrum than to report on something that challenges their assumptions about this Government. It is far more comfortable to cover performative activism than to admit that structured, rigorous education, the very thing they once sneered at as “old-fashioned,”is delivering extraordinary gains for the children they claim to champion.

The behaviour of the teachers’ unions and much of the education establishment has made it very clear that they are no longer defenders of children’s learning either. They are defenders of their own comfort, ideology, and power. The moment Erica Stanford started delivering results they sulked and complained. They suddenly discovered a dozen reasons why the reforms should “slow down,” be “consulted on more,” or be “refocused around the Treaty.” Anything, absolutely anything, except acknowledging that structured teaching and clear expectations are finally lifting student achievement after years of drift.



Today on Ryan Bridge’s Newstalk ZB show, the PPTA’s Chris Abercrombie tried to downplay the maths results this week. Rather than welcoming the dramatic gains students have made, he sniffed that “we had different ways of doing it and this is another way of doing it,” before warning that an “intense focus is… resource heavy, a very resource heavy way of doing it.” It was the perfect encapsulation of a sector so wedded to its own failed methods that even unprecedented progress is treated as a threat. Never mind that the reforms are clearly working and that thousands of students, including Māori and Pasifika kids who were failed for decades, are finally catching up at lightning speed.

The unionist instinct to protect the comfortable consensus was on full display when in discussing curriculum priorities Ryan Bridge joked “you can do art at home,” and Abercrombie instantly replied, “you can do maths at home.” A breathtakingly out-of-touch comment and an extraordinary admission that the unions no longer see it as schools’ job to deliver numeracy and literacy basics. It is a crystal-clear illustration of why Erica Stanford’s reforms are needed. The sector has forgotten what school is for.

Before concluding the interview, Bridge asked whether Stanford might in fact be the best Education Minister in decades, to which Abercrombie scoffed, called it “silly,” and refused to answer. Plainly, acknowledging the truth would blow up years of union scaremongering and force him to admit that a minister outside their ideological tribe is achieving what they could not.


The education establishment don’t like the pace of change. They don’t like being asked to adopt evidence-based practice. They don’t like the focus on basics because it undermines the ideological fads they’ve spent years promoting. And most of all, they don’t like a Minister who refuses to bow to their political theatrics. The moment Stanford stepped into the portfolio with a clear agenda and the courage to push for real change, the sector reacted like a threatened cartel. Their public statements since have been little more than coded protests that they should still be running the system, despite the fact they presided over its decline.

The obsession with the Treaty is the most telling example of this ideological capture. Instead of welcoming reforms that are demonstrably improving outcomes for Māori students, the unions insist on dragging every debate back to symbolic politics. They accuse the Minister of undermining the Treaty while ignoring the obvious truth that nothing has undermined Māori educational success more than the low expectations and incoherent teaching methods they have defended for years. Their fixation on performative Treaty rhetoric has become a convenient shield, a way to dodge accountability and avoid confronting their own role in entrenching an inequitable system.

And now, faced with reforms that are finally working, they have exposed themselves as the greatest barrier to children’s success. They are not fighting for students. They are fighting to preserve a failed status quo. Only a sector terrified of losing ideological control would respond to massive academic gains by demanding that the Minister slow down.

News | Erica Stanford | MP for East Coast Bays | National Party
Erica Stanford. Photo: National Party website.
What Erica Stanford’s success has revealed is uncomfortable but unavoidable. The unions and much of the education bureaucracy have been gatekeepers, not guardians. The system has not been failing despite them, it has been failing because of them. And now that a Minister has arrived with the determination and clarity to put children, not ideology, at the centre of schooling, they are resisting with every tool they have. Their complaints are not a sign that Stanford is going too fast. They’re proof that, for the first time in years, she has the ship going in the right direction.

These results matter and will change lives. This Government’s reforms are practical, measurable, and transformative, and they deserve far more than a passing mention while the media chases politically convenient distractions.

New Zealand should be celebrating. Parents should feel hope. Teachers should feel proud. The entire country should recognise that we are finally pulling out of the nosedive.

If the media won’t tell the story, then others must. Because the truth is simple: for the first time in a long time, our education system is moving in the right direction. And that is worth more than all the activist press releases in the world.

Ani O'Brien is a really well regarded writer known for her well reasoned nuanced takes. Well done Inruin.
 

The best education news in years and the media buries it​

Warning: This is a very frustrated and ranty article!​

Ani O’Brien
Nov 26, 2025


Sometimes this country feels allergic to good news, especially when that good news comes from a government our media class has decided must never be allowed a win. This week, Education Minister Erica Stanford released some of the most extraordinary education data New Zealand has seen in decades…students are making between one and two years of maths progress in just twelve weeks. It should have led every bulletin. It should have been the headline splashed across every front page. Erica Stanford should be being hoisted above shoulders and paraded through the streets as a heroine. Chris Hipkins would have thrown himself a parade if he had done anything except drive our education system into decline when he was in charge. What Stanford’s reforms are achieving is nothing short of extraordinary.


Subscribe



Education Minister Erica Stanford. Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images
But instead of covering the biggest step forward for student achievement in a generation, the media is devoting its energy to breathless reporting on activist principals and boards issuing dramatic proclamations about “giving effect to the Treaty,” as though the Government had announced some kind of education coup. Instead of being celebrated for lifting Māori education results, she is basically being called a racist.


The contrast is surreal. On one side, a data-driven success story proving that the Government’s reforms are working for all students, including Māori. On the other, political theatre from schools and equally theatrical amplification from journalists who seemed determined to turn it into the story of the day, zero f***s given about accuracy. Please note that Newstalk ZB have be the lone platform discussing this in depth and deserve to be applauded for doing their job because apparently that is a big ask.

What has made the media’s fixation even more absurd is the fact that these schools, and the journalists cheerleading them, appear to have fundamentally misunderstood, or perhaps wilfully misrepresented, the Minister’s actual position on the Treaty. Erica Stanford has been remarkably consistent and clear that the most meaningful way schools can meet the Crown’s Treaty obligations is by ensuring Māori children’s education results improve. What Stanford is doing is more than a slogan; it is the most practical, measurable, and genuinely transformative approach any Minister of Education has taken in years. If you care about Māori success, then you should care about literacy, numeracy, and structured teaching, not performative declarations that do nothing for the actual children sitting in actual classrooms right now.


Yet the media ignore that clarity entirely. They prefer the drama. They prefer to cast Stanford as somehow anti-Treaty because it fits their pre-loaded narrative. And they are only too eager to platform principals making political statements as though they were civil rights heroes instead of bureaucrats misrepresenting the truth. It is astonishing that journalists who never tire of lecturing the public about “misinformation” couldn’t muster the curiosity to read, or watch, what the Minister has actually said. The truth, inconveniently for them, is that her reforms are delivering precisely the equity gains the system has failed to produce for Māori students for years.

What Stanford is doing is of so much note that Estonia’s Education Minister Kristina Kallas is here in New Zealand looking at our reforms. She explained to Mike Hosking that what we are doing is of huge interest to education leaders in Europe and we are being watched with great interest. She also said our reforms are moving us in the right direction. By the way, Estonia is top in Europe when it comes to maths.

And it is no wonder we are the talk of the town, the results of the Government’s maths acceleration trial for year 7 and 8 students needing extra support were nothing short of exceptional. Students who were already a year behind made extraordinary progress, up to two full years in twelve weeks for those in in-person tutoring, and a full year for those simply experiencing the new structured curriculum and hour-a-day maths. Even the control groups, with no extra intervention beyond the reformed curriculum and workbooks, made a year’s progress in the same time.

Let that sink in, the baseline reforms alone are lifting achievement at a rate this country has not seen in decades. This is the kind of rapid turnaround that educators around the world dream of. It is proof that structured teaching, quality materials, and clear expectations work and that years of ideological experimentation and educational drift have cost students dearly.

Yet where was the coverage (bar good ol’ Newstalk ZB)? Where were the longform features on the teachers delivering these results? Where were the op-eds celebrating the first real reversal of education decline in a generation? Where were the political commentators acknowledging that the Government’s reforms are not only working but working spectacularly? Instead, the media spent the day elevating schools staging symbolic protests over a Treaty issue that doesn’t even exist.

This is not just a failure of editorial judgement. It is an indictment of an ideological media ecosystem that cares more about narrative than outcomes. It is easier for journalists to amplify a political tantrum than to report on something that challenges their assumptions about this Government. It is far more comfortable to cover performative activism than to admit that structured, rigorous education, the very thing they once sneered at as “old-fashioned,”is delivering extraordinary gains for the children they claim to champion.

The behaviour of the teachers’ unions and much of the education establishment has made it very clear that they are no longer defenders of children’s learning either. They are defenders of their own comfort, ideology, and power. The moment Erica Stanford started delivering results they sulked and complained. They suddenly discovered a dozen reasons why the reforms should “slow down,” be “consulted on more,” or be “refocused around the Treaty.” Anything, absolutely anything, except acknowledging that structured teaching and clear expectations are finally lifting student achievement after years of drift.



Today on Ryan Bridge’s Newstalk ZB show, the PPTA’s Chris Abercrombie tried to downplay the maths results this week. Rather than welcoming the dramatic gains students have made, he sniffed that “we had different ways of doing it and this is another way of doing it,” before warning that an “intense focus is… resource heavy, a very resource heavy way of doing it.” It was the perfect encapsulation of a sector so wedded to its own failed methods that even unprecedented progress is treated as a threat. Never mind that the reforms are clearly working and that thousands of students, including Māori and Pasifika kids who were failed for decades, are finally catching up at lightning speed.

The unionist instinct to protect the comfortable consensus was on full display when in discussing curriculum priorities Ryan Bridge joked “you can do art at home,” and Abercrombie instantly replied, “you can do maths at home.” A breathtakingly out-of-touch comment and an extraordinary admission that the unions no longer see it as schools’ job to deliver numeracy and literacy basics. It is a crystal-clear illustration of why Erica Stanford’s reforms are needed. The sector has forgotten what school is for.

Before concluding the interview, Bridge asked whether Stanford might in fact be the best Education Minister in decades, to which Abercrombie scoffed, called it “silly,” and refused to answer. Plainly, acknowledging the truth would blow up years of union scaremongering and force him to admit that a minister outside their ideological tribe is achieving what they could not.


The education establishment don’t like the pace of change. They don’t like being asked to adopt evidence-based practice. They don’t like the focus on basics because it undermines the ideological fads they’ve spent years promoting. And most of all, they don’t like a Minister who refuses to bow to their political theatrics. The moment Stanford stepped into the portfolio with a clear agenda and the courage to push for real change, the sector reacted like a threatened cartel. Their public statements since have been little more than coded protests that they should still be running the system, despite the fact they presided over its decline.

The obsession with the Treaty is the most telling example of this ideological capture. Instead of welcoming reforms that are demonstrably improving outcomes for Māori students, the unions insist on dragging every debate back to symbolic politics. They accuse the Minister of undermining the Treaty while ignoring the obvious truth that nothing has undermined Māori educational success more than the low expectations and incoherent teaching methods they have defended for years. Their fixation on performative Treaty rhetoric has become a convenient shield, a way to dodge accountability and avoid confronting their own role in entrenching an inequitable system.

And now, faced with reforms that are finally working, they have exposed themselves as the greatest barrier to children’s success. They are not fighting for students. They are fighting to preserve a failed status quo. Only a sector terrified of losing ideological control would respond to massive academic gains by demanding that the Minister slow down.

News | Erica Stanford | MP for East Coast Bays | National Party
Erica Stanford. Photo: National Party website.
What Erica Stanford’s success has revealed is uncomfortable but unavoidable. The unions and much of the education bureaucracy have been gatekeepers, not guardians. The system has not been failing despite them, it has been failing because of them. And now that a Minister has arrived with the determination and clarity to put children, not ideology, at the centre of schooling, they are resisting with every tool they have. Their complaints are not a sign that Stanford is going too fast. They’re proof that, for the first time in years, she has the ship going in the right direction.

These results matter and will change lives. This Government’s reforms are practical, measurable, and transformative, and they deserve far more than a passing mention while the media chases politically convenient distractions.

New Zealand should be celebrating. Parents should feel hope. Teachers should feel proud. The entire country should recognise that we are finally pulling out of the nosedive.

If the media won’t tell the story, then others must. Because the truth is simple: for the first time in a long time, our education system is moving in the right direction. And that is worth more than all the activist press releases in the world.

An opinion piece you obviously agree with and plenty more would. I think one frustration around education and the changes to be implemented is the many principals that were of a view of not throwing the baby out with the bath water around ncea, many agreeing with changes necessary I think but also mindful that it has worked for some with the ability to not need to be as reliant on an exam result for those that struggle in that arena but are very capable with their work throughout the year showing their ability. I know the article sites treaty issues being the reason for criticism, but from what I’ve seen the unwillingness to hear why it works for some has been the main criticism. I agree with the sentiment of the author but feel like it’s just how media is where it’s the grabbing headlines they offer and nothing different to what labour encountered last election, though incidents like Kiri Allen gave them what they were looking for. The headline right now is that we’re a country hugely underperforming and anyone can blame that on Adrian Orr or the previous government but that’s the reality whoever’s to blame. The current trending of where political polls lie, though are only an indication are that many are blaming the current government for current situation we find ourselves in as an underperforming nation and many indicators going backwards
 
An opinion piece you obviously agree with and plenty more would. I think one frustration around education and the changes to be implemented is the many principals that were of a view of not throwing the baby out with the bath water around ncea, many agreeing with changes necessary I think but also mindful that it has worked for some with the ability to not need to be as reliant on an exam result for those that struggle in that arena but are very capable with their work throughout the year showing their ability. I know the article sites treaty issues being the reason for criticism, but from what I’ve seen the unwillingness to hear why it works for some has been the main criticism. I agree with the sentiment of the author but feel like it’s just how media is where it’s the grabbing headlines they offer and nothing different to what labour encountered last election, though incidents like Kiri Allen gave them what they were looking for. The headline right now is that we’re a country hugely underperforming and anyone can blame that on Adrian Orr or the previous government but that’s the reality whoever’s to blame. The current trending of where political polls lie, though are only an indication are that many are blaming the current government for current situation we find ourselves in as an underperforming nation and many indicators going backwards
There is legitimate concern about the speed of the roll out of the new curriculum.

However, in my opinion, the speed of the roll out is a small price when results were continuing to decline. The results so far speak for themselves. Will that continue is the question but it certainly appears to be on the right track.

Trigger warning - māori don't seem to learn differently to everyone else it seems based on these results.
 
There is legitimate concern about the speed of the roll out of the new curriculum.

However, in my opinion, the speed of the roll out is a small price when results were continuing to decline. The results so far speak for themselves. Will that continue is the question but it certainly appears to be on the right track.

Trigger warning - māori don't seem to learn differently to everyone else it seems based on these results.
My point was and is that it does work for some for the reasons I mentioned in my last post among other reasons. I don’t think many were or are against changes necessary, but not completely disregarding what was. I think it also could create a real grey area in the future also for those that had learned in the time whether they will hold any weight if it’s to be completely disregarded. I don’t think it’s a māori issue to your last point, many others struggle in an exam arena too, myself included. It’s a format before my time but would have suited me well being competent in what I achieved throughout the year
 
With the exception of TSB, all the major banks lowered their floating interest rates before or after yesterday's OCR announcement.

Small player, the Co-Operative Bank are offering the lowest floating rate of under 5%.

For only the second time this century, the average major bank floating rate is below 5.8% and now sits at 5.65%.... the only other time this century the average has been this low, was during the COVID crisis when the average banking floating rate was 5.1% when the RBNZ gave "cheap" money to the banks to prop up businesses and prop up the economy. Since 2000, the average bank floating rate, according to stats from the RBNZ, is 6.4%.
 
Like you do eh. Pffff.

Quoting a hard right freespeechunion opinion doesn't bode well for any facts.

I expect nothing less ftom you.
So, just like I said to your mum earlier, counter the actual facts with some of your own. I could care less what you think of the opinion part but the stats are there for all to see.

I'll wait.
 
Hmm my sources being revealed haha
“If you wonder why I have a bromance with the prime minister [Christopher Luxon], he used to be my old boss,” Gray added, after a video played showing the pair embracing.

Sounds very credible there, a mate of the prime minister who was the first to benefit from the fast track process babbling pro government spiels.

Inruin wishes he could have an embrace.'
 
Back
Top Bottom