Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.
Interesting that the very politicians getting upset at the scrapping of the SmokeFree legalisation are the same ones getting upset that some beneficiaries are going to be receiving bank cards which will restrict what items can be brought on them.... i.e. food and not for booze or smokes. Oh, the games politicians play.
How would you like someone telling you what you can and can't buy though miket12? Those enforcing this pretend to be libertarian for themselves and authoritarian for the lower class. It's about control.
 

NZWarriors.com

If this has pissed you off, you'd hate to know that there's a MBIE working group currently looking at a minimum solar system per new build dwelling for the next lot of changes being considered for H1 Energy efficiency of the acceptable solutions to the NZBC. Wait for incoming fire from @MrFrankWhite over that one.
Haha solar panels would be fine if the powers that be acknowledged the inherent risks and built the grid around massive swings of intermittent energy. Alas they haven't and now Australia is staring at a Feed-in-charge for solar :oops:
 
How would you like someone telling you what you can and can't buy though miket12? Those enforcing this pretend to be libertarian for themselves and authoritarian for the lower class. It's about control.
Once again, look at the empirical evidence in Australia. Libertarianism only works if you are able to comprehend the concept
 
How would you like someone telling you what you can and can't buy though miket12? Those enforcing this pretend to be libertarian for themselves and authoritarian for the lower class. It's about control.
Wasn't the SmokeFree legislation doing precisely that by saying people form a certain age could never buy cigarettes? Really good then, in your eyes, that the Atlas run ACT Party got rid of it?
 
Wasn't the SmokeFree legislation doing precisely that by saying people form a certain age could never buy cigarettes? Really good then, in your eyes, that the Atlas run ACT Party got rid of it?
No. Smoking, vaping is vile - I'd love to see it gone. Also not good is the corruption driven by Big Tobacco and enabled by this government through NZ First and Casey Costello.

But of course the wider issue is being utterly spiteful and punitive on the poor yet again, while extracting wealth upwards at a rate of knots. It's a war on the poor, which will ultimately extend to all of us.

Those preaching less government are forcing authoritarian diktats on the poor. Yet again.
 
No. Smoking, vaping is vile - I'd love to see it gone. Also not good is the corruption driven by Big Tobacco and enabled by this government through NZ First and Casey Costello.

But of course the wider issue is being utterly spiteful and punitive on the poor yet again, while extracting wealth upwards at a rate of knots. It's a war on the poor, which will ultimately extend to all of us.

Those preaching less government are forcing authoritarian diktats on the poor. Yet again.
Of course that’s the side you take. Others would say that certain demographics need more of a helping hand to make good decisions. They’re a caring bunch this coalition.
 
No. Smoking, vaping is vile - I'd love to see it gone. Also not good is the corruption driven by Big Tobacco and enabled by this government through NZ First and Casey Costello.

But of course the wider issue is being utterly spiteful and punitive on the poor yet again, while extracting wealth upwards at a rate of knots. It's a war on the poor, which will ultimately extend to all of us.

Those preaching less government are forcing authoritarian diktats on the poor. Yet again.
Intergenerational welfare dependence is vile.

This isn’t going to affect people on welfare looking for a job, it’s a last resort punitive approach for those not interested in contributing to society while they live off it.

This isn’t the poor or disadvantaged. This is the losers.

How would you like someone telling you what you can and can't buy though miket12?
That’s exactly the effect excess tax does. It limits what I can and can’t buy to pay for the people that I support but don’t want any consequences…
 
Intergenerational welfare dependence is vile.

This isn’t going to affect people on welfare looking for a job, it’s a last resort punitive approach for those not interested in contributing to society while they live off it.

This isn’t the poor or disadvantaged. This is the losers.


That’s exactly the effect excess tax does. It limits what I can and can’t buy to pay for the people that I support but don’t want any consequences…
1748237925190.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom