newsroom.co.nz
www.taxpayers.org.nz
Prioritising welfare, health, education, environment and law and order is hard right, neoliberal, by the rich and for the rich?To provide some much needed context missing from your post Wiz
The graphic is a comparison of the coalition's last two budgets. Nothing else.
The headline of the article you have taken this from, with no link provided is this:
View attachment 13133
Here's the top few paragraphs, highlighting quite clearly this is a hard right neoliberal budget.
Of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
Thomas Coughlan: Why Govt's hard tack right in Budget is a challenge for Labour
OPINION: The Government shows its colours – and why Labour is in trouble.www.nzherald.co.nz
View attachment 13134
You would have hated the last line in that article:To provide some much needed context missing from your post Wiz
The graphic is a comparison of the coalition's last two budgets. Nothing else.
The headline of the article you have taken this from, with no link provided is this:
View attachment 13133
Here's the top few paragraphs, highlighting quite clearly this is a hard right neoliberal budget.
Of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
Thomas Coughlan: Why Govt's hard tack right in Budget is a challenge for Labour
OPINION: The Government shows its colours – and why Labour is in trouble.
View attachment 13134
They're not prioritizing welfare, health, education or environment. They're running all of those down
The stats show the increase over the past 2 years since labours last budget: welfare nationals spending 12.5% more than Labour spent; health up 9%, education up 6.1%, environment up 13.8%.
‘Labour’s finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds agrees, saying Investment Boost is a “good measure because it helps businesses to reinvest in their business”.Corruption, chaos and economic damage
Investment Boost: Govt's ticking fiscal time bomb
Analysis: If the Investment Boost tax deductions run to $10 billion, or even $100 billion, it's all good for growth, the Government insists.
You're posting a graphic comparing the current coalition's last two budgets. Not Labour.The stats show the increase over the past 2 years since labours last budget: welfare nationals spending 12.5% more than Labour spent; health up 9%, education up 6.1%, environment up 13.8%.
Facts are facts even when they are inconvenient - keep spreading the far left propaganda though… it just undermines credibility when the mainstream media show facts saying otherwise.
View attachment 13137
Try and be honest please wiz. Read the full article.‘Labour’s finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds agrees, saying Investment Boost is a “good measure because it helps businesses to reinvest in their business”.
‘United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Germany and Canada as examples of other nations running similar schemes with positive economic results.’
Is this another one of those pro National articles you post without reading the content
Nationals got another 3 years locked in I reckon!
As anyone in business knows, depreciation is recovered when you sell the asset for a profit, so it’s a zero sum game long term.
Address your previous comment about the graphic that you seem to be attributing to Labour incorrectly please?
The graph is the increase in budgets since Labour was in govt. The increase in the 2 years National has done their budgets.
No it's not. It's your choice to do what you do, but stupidity for me to keep going with this.The graph is the increase in budgets since Labour was in govt. The increase in the 2 years National has done their budgets.
Not attributing to Labour. This is the increase in govt budgets since Labour. Not hard to understand really
Instead of me doing all the work and posting multiple sources, post some hard data with facts and figures from a reputable source showing your claimed decrease in funding!
You literally said this, when it's between the coalitions two budgets not between Labours and the coalitions budget?
Ok, so the figures are twice as good then. If that’s the way you read it, it’s even better
It's literally what it is bro, not the way I read it. Presenting it the way you did is wrong.Ok, so the figures are twice as good then. If that’s the way you read it, it’s even better
welfare up 12.5%
health up 9%
education up 6.1%
environment up 13.8%.
In 1 year! Amazing investment and definitely not running things down!
Okay, so you've been completely wrong in the presentation of this - any apology? After all, more than once you have accused me of being a conspiracy theorist and spreading disinformation. Without basis or proof either. Like I say, you do you, but at least try and be honest.Ok, so the figures are twice as good then. If that’s the way you read it, it’s even better
welfare up 12.5%
health up 9%
education up 6.1%
environment up 13.8%.
In 1 year! Amazing investment and definitely not running things down!
As anyone in business knows, depreciation is recovered when you sell the asset for a profit, so it’s a zero sum game long term.
... preaching to the uninformed
