Politics šŸ—³ļø NZ Politics

Treasury publishes crisis playbook - favours Official Cash Rate cuts over Government spending and money printing​

Lower interest rates are the answer to supporting the economy in a time of crisis, according to Treasury.

But if New Zealand were hit by a natural disaster or more severe trade war, for example, once interest rates were already near rock bottom, the Government should step in with support packages, rather than turn to the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) to print money.

Treasury shared this view in its draft three-yearly Long-Term Insights Briefing released on Thursday.

It said the Official Cash Rate (OCR) was the ā€œmost reliableā€ tool that could be used to lessen economy-wide ups and downs.

ā€œFiscal policy [government initiatives] should be used sparingly,ā€ Secretary to the Treasury Iain Rennie said.

ā€œRather, monetary policy [which the RBNZ is responsible for] should take the lead role in smoothing economic cycles and responding to crises affecting the whole country.ā€

Rennieā€™s position largely aligns with that of Finance Minister Nicola Willis, who said she would keep government spending restrictive, despite the potential for a global trade war to flatten New Zealandā€™s economic growth.

ā€œThis is not a time to dramatically change direction. It is a time to stay the course,ā€ she said.

Meanwhile, financial markets are betting on the OCR being cut by more than what the RBNZ projected in February, before the United States unveiled the extent of its tariffs.

Willis wouldnā€™t comment on whether she would use money printing, or quantitative easing, should the global trade war escalate to crisis point.

She noted volatility in the bond market, but suggested talk of money printing was premature.

At 3.5%, the OCR is at, or just above, whatā€™s considered to be the neutral rate, which is neither expansionary nor contractionary.

Treasury was wary of the risks associated with money printing and couldnā€™t say how much the RBNZā€™s 2020 and 2021 $55 billion Large-Scale Asset Purchase (LSAP) programme stimulated the economy.

ā€œAlternative monetary policy tools can be effective in supporting monetary policy objectives, although there remains uncertainty about the size and timing of impacts,ā€ Treasury said.

ā€œFor example, LSAPs have a clear role in addressing financial market dysfunction, but their impacts outside of this situation have proven harder to estimate.ā€

Treasury noted the direct cost to taxpayers of the LSAP programme is estimated to hit $10.5b.

It didnā€™t try to tally up the benefits of the LSAP programme to the Governmentā€™s finances, in terms of how the support it provided generated more tax revenue, for example.

Former Reserve Bank Governor Adrian Orr said on numerous occasions he believed the upsides were worth multiples more than the costs.

Treasury said a ā€œcarefulā€ analysis of the costs, benefits and risks should be done before the RBNZ printed money again.

It noted it was plausible for New Zealand to find itself in a crisis at a time the OCR was already near zero, as was the case before the pandemic.

While banks are now operationally ready to deal with negative interest rates, Treasury said the Government needed to consider using fiscal policy to support the economy if monetary policy approached its limits.

However, Rennie cautioned; ā€œThe experience from the response to Covid-19 shows that fiscal policy is easier to loosen in a downturn or shock but much more difficult to tighten in an upturn. This can lead to debt ratcheting upwards over timeā€.

Accordingly, he said fiscal policy should be ā€œtimely, temporary and targetedā€.

Treasury said giving people affected by a particular shock cash payments best met this criterion.

Whereas increasing investment in large complex infrastructure programmes, like the Government did during the pandemic, wasnā€™t timely and was only moderately temporary and targeted.

Treasury estimated only 30% of the money allocated towards the Covid response entered the economy in the year to June 2020, with 36% of it being spent after June 2022, once inflation was well above target.

It singled out the wage subsidy for being timely and temporary, but less targeted.

Treasury noted New Zealandā€™s response to Covid was one of the largest among advanced economies, with spending and foregone revenue due to the pandemic estimated to be worth about 20% of gross domestic product (GDP).

Looking ahead, Rennie said; ā€œIt is important that the Government maintains low debt levels, so we have the capacity to respond to economic shocks when they occur.

ā€œOn average, from the late 1980s to now, we have spent the equivalent of 10% of our annual GDP each decade responding to these shocks.

ā€œWe need to make sure we are passing on to future generations that same flexibility we have had so that they are able to respond to the shocks they will undoubtedly face.ā€

The public has until May 8 to provide feedback on Treasuryā€™s draft Long-Term Insights Briefing. It will publish its final report at the end of June.

 

NZWarriors.com

3 strikes - death penalty
Would rather see a situation where the victim stands to gain some monetary recoup some how? The perpetrators could have any possessions of value be sold to go to the victims or if nothing of value is in their possession, perhaps a working situation where a portion of their wage goes to the victim until that value is met
 
Would rather see a situation where the victim stands to gain some monetary recoup some how? The perpetrators could have any possessions of value be sold to go to the victims or if nothing of value is in their possession, perhaps a working situation where a portion of their wage goes to the victim until that value is met
Sort of like prostitution? Just pay for the services used šŸ«£

Donā€™t know if thatā€™s the best for risk vs rewardā€¦
 
Sort of like prostitution? Just pay for the services used šŸ«£

Donā€™t know if thatā€™s the best for risk vs rewardā€¦
Certainly needs to be incorporated somehow into the punishment with many never having their money recuperated, or at least often a small portion of the money returned. A retiree is totally dependent on those funds to survive in their retirement, so the consequences of the theft is huge to their day to day survival depending on their financial situation. Living off their super is often unrealistic. Sometimes too the naivety shown to allow this to happen is bewildering with details passed on willingly
 


gotta try stay relevant now slimy seymourā€™s whole te tiriti debacle is over and done with as the prime minister said it would be from day one i suppose.

why anyone would give her money is beyond me though.
She seems to be undecided about which foot she puts in her mouth so tries both. The Greens are in a bit of a mess aren't they.
 
not pointed at you man, more a reply to the article.

the bill itself caused a lot less division than the politicians who chose to weaponise it did.

it was never going through, we knew that for the last 18 months.
those who used it to plan marches and protests etc are just as guilty as seymour is for the division.
heā€™s a smarmy little cunt. we all know that, but heā€™s making his opposition look worse and worse by the week.

greens and TPM have been so busy complaining about the nothing it was, that theyā€™ve spent half the entire term on that, unsuccessfully freeing palestine and little else.
 
Last edited:
not pointed at you man, more a reply to the article.

the bill itself caused a lot less division than the politicians who chose to weaponise it did.

it was never going through, we knew that for the last 18 months.
those who used it to plan marches and protests etc are just as guilty as seymour is for the division.
heā€™s a smarmy little cunt. we all know that, but heā€™s making his opposition look worse and worse by the week.

greens and TPM have been so busy complaining about the nothing it was, that theyā€™ve spent half the entire term on that, unsuccessfully freeing palestine and little else.
I thought it was an interesting perspective ftom chris finlayson, a national mp i didnā€™t mind
 
I find this amazingā€¦. a politician who is actually not giving the government all the credit for a reduction is the crime figuresā€¦. how refreshing!!!

ANALYSIS: The dramatic fall in victims of violent crime, and the impact of the Governmentā€™s ā€˜vibeā€™ rather than its policies​

Itā€™s a general rule of politics that governments claim credit when things are going well, and blame others (especially the previous Government) when they donā€™t.

But Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith was curiously cautious in an interview with the Herald last week, when he was talking up the Governmentā€™s success in restoring law and order.

Asked about factors independent of the Governmentā€™s agenda, he said: ā€œWeā€™re definitely contributing to it in the effort that weā€™re making, but Iā€™m not so arrogant to think that the world revolves around what happens in the Beehive. There are broader factors.ā€

The drop in serious youth offending since the middle of last year, for example, started before many of the Governmentā€™s key policies to tackle youth crime were implemented. Youth advocates speculate that the number of serious repeat youth offenders spiked following the increased isolation and stress of the Covid pandemic, and has started reverting to the downward pre-pandemic trend.

A downward pre-pandemic trend was also apparent in general crime statistics, so reversion to this might also be a factor in the 28,000 fewer adult victims of violent crime in the year to February, compared to the year to October 2023.

This is understandably a success the Government is keen to highlight; it smashes the public service target of 20,000 fewer such victims by 2029.

Announcing it yesterday, Police Minister Mark Mitchell acknowledged the work of Corrections and police (noting a 40% increase in police foot patrolling), but also paid tribute to wider efforts including from ethnic communities and the general public.

Goldsmith didnā€™t mention broader factors. He said it showed ā€œour work to restore law and order is paying offā€, citing anti-gang legislation, the return of Three Strikes, limiting sentencing discounts, and scrapping state funding for cultural reports.

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon added that the new tools for police to fight gangs were already ā€œunearthing illegal guns and illegal drugsā€.

This was meant to be enabled through police searching the private homes of gang members under a gang patch prohibition order.

Trouble is, no such orders have been issued.

Then thereā€™s Three strikes 2.0, which doesnā€™t commence until mid-June.

And the Governmentā€™s sentencing reforms donā€™t start until the end of June.

ā€˜Vibe is importantā€™​

No state funding for cultural reports, however, has been in place since March last year. The reports led to an average of a 10% sentencing discount, according to Justice Ministry analysis.

Itā€™s possible - though seems unlikely - that this has played a major role in dramatically lowering the number of victims of violent crime in less than a year.

Thereā€™d need to be a significant number of violent offenders serving longer prison sentences due to an inability to fund cultural reports. And those longer sentences would need to have prevented enough violent offending to filter through to the number of victims.

Goldsmith seemed to acknowledge this unlikelihood last week, when he told the Herald that the message was as important as the actual policy.

ā€œIt was a signal: rather than this culture of excuses about why you do things, actually, people have to be held personally responsible.ā€

He was responding to a Herald article about changes made in 2016 by the previous National-led Government, which provided stronger safeguards for community sentences. This led to the shorter and fewer prison sentences Goldsmith was blaming Labour for.

ā€œItā€™s one of the contributing factors,ā€ Goldsmith conceded.

ā€œI think by far a very significant contributing factor is the shift in Government direction right across the whole board, which was [under Labour], we want fewer people in prison, and lo and behold there were fewer people in prison.

ā€œVibe is important. It filters its way through. We changed the message.ā€

Asked about this, former District Court Judge David Harvey said he never felt any vibe from the Labour Government telling him to be more lenient in his sentencing.

ā€œI donā€™t think any judge would consciously think, ā€˜Oh, the Government has said weā€™ve got to reduce prison numbers. Therefore, Iā€™m not going to sentence this guy to jail.ā€™

ā€œYou deal with the case thatā€™s before you on the basis of the law. You donā€™t deal with it on the basis of some mysterious vibe thatā€™s come from Wellington,ā€ said Harvey, who retired in 2016 but returned to the bench under an acting warrant from 2018 to 2021.

Nor was it something that could be measured, he added.

ā€œThere isnā€™t a vibe-o-meter at the door of the judgeā€™s chambers that detects the message from the politicians, and influences accordingly.

ā€œItā€™s probably nice to think that judges take some notice of what politicians say, but no, the oath is to do right to all men according to the laws and usages of New Zealand, and thatā€™s what you do.ā€

What the data says​

This doesnā€™t necessarily mean the Governmentā€™s policies - or its vibe - have had little or no impact on reducing crime.

And it appears to be reducing.

The number of victims of violent crime dropped from a peak of 215,000 in the year to June 2024 to 157,000 for the year to February 2025 - a 27% fall. There were 12,000 fewer victims in Auckland, while in Canterbury there were 5000 fewer victims.

These statistics are from the NZ Crime and Victims Survey, which is considered more robust because it includes the vast majority of crime that goes unreported.


1744745373536.webp

But there are also downward trends in police victimisation data - a report of a crime to police, regardless of whether it leads to any charges.

The number of police victimisation reports dropped in 2024 for ā€œacts intended to cause injuryā€ (which covers assault and serious assault), and for aggravated robbery.

This followed year-on-year increases in both categories, which led to an increasing number of annual charges and convictions in court.

Luxon yesterday also mentioned a drop in ram raids, though he didnā€™t mention that these peaked in mid-2022, well before he took office.

1744745461054.webp

In his statement yesterday, at least Goldsmith acknowledged that the numbers are inherently volatile.

But he couldnā€™t resist the general rule in politics, suggesting any future rise in the number of victims would be Labourā€™s fault.

ā€œItā€™s important to remember this survey covers a 24-month period, so we will continue to see the results of Labourā€™s soft-on-crime approach filter through at points.ā€

 
Back
Top Bottom