Certainly won’t be winning a logie for that performanceAmazing lol. This guy's either the biggest fraud in the country, a terrrible ACTor or just totally oot the gate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Certainly won’t be winning a logie for that performanceAmazing lol. This guy's either the biggest fraud in the country, a terrrible ACTor or just totally oot the gate.
He should have won a CABA, Canadian academy of bullshit artists.Certainly won’t be winning a logie for that performance
Don't you mean Cunts and Bullshit ArtistsHe should have won a CABA, Canadian academy of bullshit artists.
People are free to do what they want. But let’s be real about the outcomes. Same as my crime argument.should they be encouraged to stay in the kitchen?
rely on men?
or barefoot and pregnant, mouth closed legs open etc? all the good old cliches?
what about solo mothers? trying to catch an education and raise her little boys better than to join gangs? be better men than their fathers?
That's why I think Efeso Collins will be missed.... a strong man with convictions and a huge heart for Pacific people. To many times, sports people are turned into heroes, but, from the times I'd dealt with him, he deserved to be looked up to and admired.And now there are so many forces trying to break that. Some of it’s unintended consequences, some of it’s racism, some of it’s classism.
Strong men raise strong families. Strong families make strong communities.
As I said I’ve rapidly become traditional conservative in regards to families. That’s not homophobic, I mean 2 parents of any sex, with traditional values and boundaries.
Same, but we shouldn’t be incentivising itI was brought up by a my mother largely. Take my hat off to any solo parent
Not sure it's a direct correlation though, women in the workforce = lower wage economy. Myriad of other factors at play.People are free to do what they want. But let’s be real about the outcomes. Same as my crime argument.
Wages went down, divorce rates went up, happiness index went down, mental health issues sky rocketed. Do you think these are good things?
Personally I think it’s fine to teach kids people are different at different things. And that there’s nothing wrong with staying at home raising kids while your partner works, regardless of gender.
Which family is better off?
A) Both parents work and earn $80k
B) One working and earning $180k and the other parenting.
again i agree.People are free to do what they want. But let’s be real about the outcomes. Same as my crime argument.
Wages went down, divorce rates went up, happiness index went down, mental health issues sky rocketed. Do you think these are good things?
Personally I think it’s fine to teach kids people are different at different things. And that there’s nothing wrong with staying at home raising kids while your partner works, regardless of gender.
Which family is better off?
A) Both parents work and earn $80k
B) One working and earning $160k and the other parenting.
Bruh take 30% of the workforce out and see what happens to wagesNot sure it's a direct correlation though, women in the workforce = lower wage economy. Myriad of other factors at play.
As you say ideally it would be a choice, option B is a good outcome for two parents units when kids are young, but that's way above median income.
Just the way it goes in adult and relationship issues that arise. The kids can sometimes become collateral unfortunatelySame, but we shouldn’t be incentivising it
OK even if there is a direct causation we're not going back now, females are outperforming males in education everywhere you look, women aren't going to stop being our doctors and teachers and shit, so what are you suggesting we do as a tradcon, restrict entry to the workforce?Bruh take 30% of the workforce out and see what happens to wages![]()
I’m not sure I get you? It’s not an olden day view. You do realise that like the large majority of people need to enter into heteronormative relationships and procreate, or your society will collapse.again i agree.
with one caveat.
such an olden days view. nuclear family but allowing for a little bit of flavour, but
the church STILL get to decide how a household is should run?
based on what? gender? skin colour?
Because of the realities. Women by default HAVE to take time out of the workforce. This affects their career progression. Women work 36hs to mens 40hrs. That’s leads to further career progression for men.sorry, two caveats. haha
who’s to say two parents earn half of what one parent might?
It’s actually not. That’s an enormous cop out. Look at the media and information that’s been consumed for the last 50years, individualism, “girl boss” , delay having kids, focus on your career.Just the way it goes in adult and relationship issues that arise. The kids can sometimes become collateral unfortunately
That’s the whole point. Used to be a mantra, up the bum no babiesbut you can’t butt fuck your way to babies.
Nope. Choose your partner wisely, look after your family. Buy arable land and fuck everybody else.OK even if there is a direct causation we're not going back now, females are outperforming males in education everywhere you look, women aren't going to stop being our doctors and teachers and shit, so what are you suggesting we do as a tradcon, restrict entry to the workforce?
*yet. Don't write off future medical advances.I’m as progressive as anyone, but you can’t butt fuck your way to babies
True, same goes for menAlso higher education and work don’t magically lead to happiness. Like the data is incredibly clear on that yeah.
it’s an olden day view that women stay home have/raise kids while the man goes out and earns.I’m not sure I get you? It’s not an olden day view. You do realise that like the large majority of people need to enter into heteronormative relationships and procreate, or your society will collapse.
I’m as progressive as anyone, but you can’t butt fuck your way to babies.
Because of the realities. Women by default HAVE to take time out of the workforce. This affects their career progression. Women work 36hs to mens 40hrs. That’s leads to further career progression for men.
View attachment 5440
Did you grow up around your old man? You said you had a solo mum?It’s actually not. That’s an enormous cop out. Look at the media and information that’s been consumed for the last 50years, individualism, “girl boss” , delay having kids, focus on your career.
Now add that to emasculation that is CREATING toxic masculinity. Chivalry and gender based roles wasn’t toxic but incels certainly are.