Yep, it's just a lot more insidious and at a far more dangerous level now marv.has that ever not been the case though?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, it's just a lot more insidious and at a far more dangerous level now marv.has that ever not been the case though?
There could well be collapses in countries individually with so many opposing views in them collectively, almost civil wars. Certainly in america its plain to see but also in authoritarian countries with the younger generations starting to push back.We can all see it's pretty grim, and there have been deliberate moves to break down relationships between groups (Putin, Trump, China, Iran etc) - they're all making moves now of some kind or other sadly.
You see this with the rise in authoritarianism, it's happening hand in hand. My mother survived ww 2 and she would be appalled but not unfamiliar with what's happening right now.
Bowie tried to warn us about the danger of encroaching fa fa fa fa fascism when him and Iggy went undercover in Berlin. Not many of us heard the warning *beep beepThere could well be collapses in countries individually with so many opposing views in them collectively, almost civil wars. Certainly in america its plain to see but also in authoritarian countries with the younger generations starting to push back.
Bowie tried to warn us about the danger of encroaching fa fa fa fa fascism when him and Iggy went undercover in Berlin. Not many of us heard the warning *beep beep
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=F-z6u5hFgPk
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOzpncIHCLs
I lean towards Mr Mojo Risin, nothing against Bowie though. He was spot on. This was a bit of a protest song of young against old, they got guns but we got the numbers. Unfortunately bullets penetrate and joints don’t.
Changing of the guard, the old school is threatened, not to mention all of the disparity and damage done through neoliberal policies, resulting in the extraction of wealth upwards. Then the same parties and groups that engendered and implemented those policies have cleverly flipped the narrative so that hey! the right will be your saviours! - a manufactured culture war that gets shouted about while a real class war continues.Ironic that a lot of baby boomers are now the biggest rubes of online disinfo operations by the masters of war they used to despise. Facebook was the worst thing to happen to them.
Look at the ones who stayed true though, plenty didn’t sell out and you can only stay true to yourself. I like the message of five to one, it’s about the amount of young to old ratio, 5-1 after the war kids came of age. In his view they had enough to take over. I do share that view that the power of numbers (people) is uncontrollable also, our government lawn protest show that along with the capital hill riot in america. To be fair, that’s democracy. Majority rules.Ironic that a lot of baby boomers are now the biggest rubes of online disinfo operations by the masters of war they used to despise. Facebook was the worst thing to happen to them.
True mate, but then there's these guys, what do we do when they become the majority?Look at the ones who stayed true though, plenty didn’t sell out and you can only stay true to yourself. I like the message of five to one, it’s about the amount of young to old ratio, 5-1 after the war kids came of age. In his view they had enough to take over. I do share that view that the power of numbers (people) is uncontrollable also, our government lawn protest show that along with the capital hill riot in america. To be fair, that’s democracy. Majority rules.



‘ ZB Plus also reported that the Greens have a copy of the CCTV tape.But here’s the thing, knowing retail, it’s almost certain video footage is available. Just from reading into articles, I feel everyone knows it as well. Eg Greens contacting the shops and not coming out defending her…
While this is really sad, unfortunately things go two ways.Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
What a fucking disgrace this is. This poor family living in a tent because of a fuck up between the landlord and the builder. The landlord sounds like complete scum, saying she’s got money from welfare to keep going, while the locks have been changed and she continues to pay power. Will be extremely sad if landlords get away the this sort of shit unchallenged.
The landlord can't just simply blame the builder. Even though retaining walls under 1.5m generally don't need a building consent, if they have a live load from a building on it, they do. As the owner of the property, it is his responsibility to apply for the building consent and to ensure ALL inspections are made.... not his builders as he is trying to claim. Hopefully, Council prosecute his arse!!!Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
What a fucking disgrace this is. This poor family living in a tent because of a fuck up between the landlord and the builder. The landlord sounds like complete scum, saying she’s got money from welfare to keep going, while the locks have been changed and she continues to pay power. Will be extremely sad if landlords get away the this sort of shit unchallenged.
That is unfortunate but as a landlord and owner, wouldn’t you be doing your own inspections and diligence to be assured that no comeback was going to land upon you, also as cash work partaken so most landlords would want all done above board to claim back some expenses. Also a very different scenario to the one you are responding to as the tenant did none of the work and the issue lies between the landlord and the builder, tenant is an innocent party in this situation.While this is really sad, unfortunately things go two ways.
I'm currently working on a project where the tenant did unauthorised building work which included removing a wall that was both load bearing and contained a bracing element, putting in new windows and putting in an illegal small second kitchen in order to sublet part of the house. Of course, there is no fire rating as would be required to have a second dwelling. Because it is the owners responsibility to apply for resource (for creating a second dwelling) and building consents, the Council are currently taking them to court. The bank is threatening that the landlord may have defaulted on their mortgage agreement because they haven't kept the house in a "safe condition" and because of the unconsented work. The tenant has left the country and is now thought to be back in their country of birth.
All the work was done for "cash" so there is no record of who did it.... and, if they were found, the tradies would just deny doing the work.
The property manager isn't accepting responsibility as the work was done between inspections and they say they did their job by informing the landlord as soon as they noticed what had been done at the next inspection.
It's going to cost the landlord over $60,000 (not including any fines imposed by the courts for unconsented building work) for "work" they had no idea was taking place.... and, because the tenant has fled back to Asia, no chance of ever recovering the money from the tenant.
Hmm is there an insurance clause that will cover? No doubt they will try and weasel out.While this is really sad, unfortunately things go two ways.
I'm currently working on a project where the tenant did unauthorised building work which included removing a wall that was both load bearing and contained a bracing element, putting in new windows and putting in an illegal small second kitchen in order to sublet part of the house. Of course, there is no fire rating as would be required to have a second dwelling. Because it is the owners responsibility to apply for resource (for creating a second dwelling) and building consents, the Council are currently taking them to court. The bank is threatening that the landlord may have defaulted on their mortgage agreement because they haven't kept the house in a "safe condition" and because of the unconsented work. The tenant has left the country and is now thought to be back in their country of birth.
All the work was done for "cash" so there is no record of who did it.... and, if they were found, the tradies would just deny doing the work.
The property manager isn't accepting responsibility as the work was done between inspections and they say they did their job by informing the landlord as soon as they noticed what had been done at the next inspection.
It's going to cost the landlord over $60,000 (not including any fines imposed by the courts for unconsented building work) for "work" they had no idea was taking place.... and, because the tenant has fled back to Asia, no chance of ever recovering the money from the tenant.
As an aside a few years ago I was renting a house from a family I knew through sport.That is unfortunate but as a landlord and owner, wouldn’t you be doing your own inspections and diligence to be assured that no comeback was going to land upon you, also as cash work partaken so most landlords would want all done above board to claim back some expenses. Also a very different scenario to the one you are responding to as the tenant did none of the work and the issue lies between the landlord and the builder, tenant is an innocent party in this situation.
I’ve got no doubt that some landlords cop a shit deal, just like some tenants but is there anything to suggest this lady in the article has done anything wrong in her case?As an aside a few years ago I was renting a house from a family I knew through sport.
They had a property agent supposedly keeping an eye on the house.
After 6 months I rang the owner overseas and told him I had not seen or heard of the property manager for 6 months since I moved in.
He was paying the manager $30 per week.
We arranged for a neighbor (another from the club) to call in now and again.
Worked well. He agreed to pass on half the savings in rental reduction to me and he kept the other $15.
Only cost me a beer when the guy inspected.
Property management can be false economy
She hasn't. Landlord has a problem as well. He hasn't kicked her out, the Council have deemed the house unsafe. No winners in this one. Pretty sure the landlord would have wanted her paying rent while he tried to sort things out.I’ve got no doubt that some landlords cop a shit deal, just like some tenants but is there anything to suggest this lady in the article has done anything wrong in her case?