Dogs breakfast.Do you mean like the National party smoking laws
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Dogs breakfast.Do you mean like the National party smoking laws
You mean changing it to how every other country in the world does it?Do you mean like the National party smoking laws
That's covers basically every policy for the last 6 years. Don't mention kiwibuild.....To be fair Labour had 6 years of planning and did bugger all
Unpalatable and my opinion.You mean changing it to how every other country in the world does it?
Is the world wide way a dogs breakfast?
I think Scotland tried doing it differently..... How did that turn out?You mean changing it to how every other country in the world does it?
Is the world wide way a dogs breakfast?
Scotland has very heavy fines for breaking smoking laws.I think Scotland tried doing it differently..... How did that turn out?
TBH, throwing money at something is all well and good, but I’d rather wait to see the results….. otherwise, it’s no different from the previous Government and mental health.Very good start to improving health outcomes for Maori. Getting rates closer to the rest of the population would be a huge step forward. Overall immunisation rates should be higher for all ethnicities in NZ than they are.
$50 million to lift immunisation rates
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti has announced a two-year $50 million package to help Māori health providers lift immunisation rates.www.beehive.govt.nz
$50 million to lift immunisation rates
HON DR SHANE RETI
Health
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti has announced a two-year $50 million package to help Māori health providers lift immunisation rates.
Launching the programme in Porirua today, Dr Reti says low immunisation rates put tamariki at particular risk of life threatening – and in some cases deadly – illness.
“We have a shared determination to make a difference for our most vulnerable.
“That’s why this programme is important and why as a government we’re determined immunisation rates will improve for all children, including low-coverage Māori babies and children.
“When there are outbreaks of serious disease like whooping cough or measles, which happens usually every three to four years, it’s high-needs communities and pēpi Māori who are often more adversely affected.
“Immunisation is one of the best ways to set up tamariki for a healthy future.
“It protects them from serious but preventable disease and reduces the risk of hospitalisation or worse – something no parent wants to face.
“We also want to be able to offer additional immunisation protection for our elders who need it.”
Of the $50 million over two years, $30 million will go to Whānau Ora providers to work with those most at risk – Māori and non-Māori pēpi, hāpu māma, and kaumātua. An additional $10 million will go to North Island partners and $10 million to South Island partners.
“The new funding will play a vital role in helping Māori health providers better reach out into their communities,” Dr Reti says.
“Whānau Ora services the under privileged and hard to reach communities where vaccination will be offered to everyone who is eligible, and Māori and non-Māori who are ready to be vaccinated.
“National campaigned on improved immunisation rates and it’s a key part of our health targets.”
Also in Porirua, Dr Reti launched My Health Record, an app giving people improved access to their personal health records, and confirmed the expansion of the Aotearoa Immunisation Register (AIR), to support vaccination outreach activity.
The expanded register went live in early December and means health providers and vaccinators can view gaps in immunisation history and be able to offer vaccinations through existing GP connections or a vaccinator portal.
Editors notes
Current Māori immunisation rates are:
66.8 per cent at 8 months
70.1 per cent at 24 months
69.7 per cent at 5 years
For sure. It does seem like the right place to start though doesn't it? Certainly targeted at the right area and should be easy to measure.TBH, throwing money at something is all well and good, but I’d rather wait to see the results….. otherwise, it’s no different from the previous Government and mental health.
Great .So what happened to the fiscal cliffs and economic crisis.For sure. It does seem like the right place to start though doesn't it? Certainly targeted at the right area
Can't disagree more Wiz. And we are a low tax country.It’s like calling someone wanting equal right for all races, racist. Or left voters being communists or right voters far right. It’s dramatisation, isn’t it.
NZ doesn’t meet that definition. We are not unbridled capitalism. Health, education, etc are public. Our housing is controlled by rules and regulations, etc.
Nothing public has been privatised or deregulated by this govt, or if it is it’s very minor. The majority of core government services are public. Taxes are at record levels with lack of indexation and many new taxes. I regard it that we are returning taxes to normal and in no way are we a low tax country.
NZ is a mix of capitalism with significant public and social services. Our parties tweak rather than moving the bar significantly. For perspective the left of US politics would still be to the right of Act.
"Take out countries similar to us who tax appropriately and have the best health, societal and economic outcomes......."From 2021 - bang on the OECD average and above Australia, UK, US, Japan, etc. Take out the small, high tax, European countries and we would be above average.
View attachment 4815
They could be viewed as states of the EU. If you included all 52 states of the USA as seperate countries isn’t that only fair?"Take out countries similar to us who tax appropriately and have the best health, societal and economic outcomes......."
Twice the infrastructure? That doesn't happen in a neolib economy, it's all about profit extraction and pushing the cost out to the public. No investment, proponents of neoliberalism don't care.They could be viewed as states of the EU. If you included all 52 states of the USA as seperate countries isn’t that only fair?
Anyway… we’re not a low tax country and capital gains taxes or wealth taxes on top won’t make much difference. We need to not spend the most and take the longest in the world to build a tunnel to get value for money from the taxes we have.
Even better - if we had the same tax rate but doubled our GDP we would have twice the infrastructure, hospitals, teachers with the same tax rate. Grow productivity rather than over taxing and stalling the economy.
Basic maths. With the same tax rate if we double GDP per capita the government gets twice the tax income without increasing taxes. With a stable population that’s where we get good hospitals, roads, rail, etc. Look at Sweden which the left highlight but they did it off the back of oil reserves and a resulting high GDP per person.Twice the infrastructure? That doesn't happen in a neolib economy, it's all about profit extraction and pushing the cost out to the public. No investment, proponents of neoliberalism don't care.
Your EU analogy is fiction. America is one country.
It's honestly weird that you don't expect huge profit extraction and under investment in everything that a country relies on, like health, infra etc. and all costs socialised. Think deregulation. Think leaky buildings that cost us $50b. Think asset sales. This is who the neolibs are Wiz.Basic maths. With the same tax rate if we double GDP per capita the government gets twice the tax income without increasing taxes. With a stable population that’s where we get good hospitals, roads, rail, etc. Look at Sweden which the left highlight but they did it off the back of oil reserves and a resulting high GDP per person.
Even in a neoliberal economy if we double the tax income to the government per person, this has to go back into social investment and services.
We’ve cheated by increasing the population to increase the GDP. But on a per capita basis we make no progress and the hospitals and schools get forever stretched.
* social investment autocorrected to sexual investment - lucky I checked because thats not something the government should be doing
His underlying theories are correct NZ voting population doesn't allow it.It's honestly weird that you don't expect huge profit extraction and under investment in everything that a country relies on, like health, infra etc. and all costs socialised. Think deregulation. Think leaky buildings that cost us $50b. Think asset sales. This is who the neolibs are Wiz.
We've been living this for 40+ years.
Huge profits = huge corporate tax.It's honestly weird that you don't expect huge profit extraction and under investment in everything that a country relies on, like health, infra etc. and all costs socialised. Think deregulation. Think leaky buildings that cost us $50b. Think asset sales. This is who the neolibs are Wiz.
We've been living this for 40+ years.