Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

First world countries have high wealth inequality but first world living standards

Third world countries have no rich people and everyone’s poor.

Evidence the trickle down works. A strong economy with big businesses benefits all, a screwed up country the rich don’t want to have anything to do with, guts the economy.

I don’t know why people want the poor option that will result in us all poorer 🤷‍♂️
 

NZWarriors.com

Reality is though Rick, all the complaints in here about people not pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, why do people not take responsibility for themselves etc, all the complaints about rising crime and beneficiaries (in a manufactured recession) - all the causes come from the same sources and policies (with a foundational neoliberal basis) that are constructing a two tier society and increasing the wealth gap at a great rate of knots.
What about

1 - cities limit the ability of people to get ahead - I know lots of young people killing it in rural Waikato and BOP. Cities make the underlying land value due to supply and demand, makes house prices excessively and prohibitively unaffordable.

2 - the break down of the nuclear family has handicapped a generation of kids (stats support this).

‘Neoliberalism’ coincides with these factors as well.

Just brainstorming here for conversation…
 
First world countries have high wealth inequality but first world living standards

Third world countries have no rich people and everyone’s poor.

Evidence the trickle down works. A strong economy with big businesses benefits all, a screwed up country the rich don’t want to have anything to do with, guts the economy.

I don’t know why people want the poor option that will result in us all poorer 🤷‍♂️
Inequality and wealth gaps are getting progressively worse though by most measures over 30 years, when does the trickle down start from the top 0.01%? It keeps trickling up.
 
Inequality and wealth gaps are getting progressively worse though by most measures over 30 years, when does the trickle down start from the top 0.01%? It keeps trickling up.
It doesn’t trickle down out of the riches hand. It trickles down through job opportunity, taxes on businesses and turnover, export income, opportunity to start businesses, etc.
 
Your first sentence at least shows some truth.
Would you want a unicorn NZ business that grows and employs 10,0000 NZer on high paying roles if the founder became a billionaire?

I guarantee if we’re anti business, anti wealth, anti private business they don’t start up here. In fact the evidence is despite a highly educated workforce, the amount that settle for the three B’s instead of going huge has cost us all dearly.
 
It doesn't, so we're not addressing the trickle up issue at all.
Soo… the economist article that suggests a CGT to address wealth inequality just wants a wealth grab then.

Got it.

I’m personally all for tackling international companies that shift revenue and don’t give back to the countries they draw revenue from.

Totally different to taxing mum and dad investors trying to save for their retirement.
 
Soo… the economist article that suggests a CGT to address wealth inequality just wants a wealth grab then.

Got it.

I’m personally all for tackling international companies that shift revenue and don’t give back to the countries they draw revenue from.

Totally different to taxing mum and dad investors trying to save for their retirement.
I see it as peasants fighting over crumbs while the robber barons run off with the capital to their secret island tax haven lairs. Kinda like when the Rolling Stones moved to France.
 
Reality is though Rick, all the complaints in here about people not pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, why do people not take responsibility for themselves etc, all the complaints about rising crime and beneficiaries (in a manufactured recession) - all the causes come from the same sources and policies (with a foundational neoliberal basis) that are constructing a two tier society and increasing the wealth gap at a great rate of knots.
I guess my point is the majority of what you describe is driven by economists, who probably moonlight as tarot readers.

Doesn't matter which side of the fence you sit on, greed and power will always win out. History has an unfortunate way of proving that correct.
 
I see it as peasants fighting over crumbs while the robber barons run off with the capital to their secret island tax haven lairs. Kinda like when the Rolling Stones moved to France.
I moved to France as well but pay more there in tax and duties than anywhere else that we have property. Ok if you are a National but otherwise not for the fainthearted.
 
Reality is though Rick, all the complaints in here about people not pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, why do people not take responsibility for themselves etc, all the complaints about rising crime and beneficiaries (in a manufactured recession) - all the causes come from the same sources and policies (with a foundational neoliberal basis) that are constructing a two tier society and increasing the wealth gap at a great rate of knots.
How is Labour's narrow Capital Gains Tax going to narrow the gap?
 
Inequality and wealth gaps are getting progressively worse though by most measures over 30 years, when does the trickle down start from the top 0.01%? It keeps trickling up.
Thats an illogical argument. Trickle down never purported to address the gap, merely increase the absolute wealth of the bottom quintile, which it has clearly done.

1763528934118.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom