Politics šŸ—³ļø NZ Politics

šŸ¤– AI Summary

šŸ“ Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

šŸ·ļø Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

šŸ“Š Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ā±ļø Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com

Care to elaborate and provide a bit more clarity?
There have been numerous warnings and indicators given by all sorts of people talking about the dangers of marginalising white males.

Not only that, but any historical events that might explain or prewarn, is propagandised beyond recognition.

As for safety and security, white males make up the overwhelming majority of the core functions of the safe and prosperous and democratic society that people enjoy.
 
To be fair both this and Tamatha Paul at Cuba Dupa aren't a great look for any political party.
Tamatha paul I dunno, it's naive, but there's a lot of pearl clutching from the right. I wish they'd clutch more when it came to fascism and bigotry.

As for the other, no it's not, and I will wait for facts before major judgement on my part.

If there is criminal activity then absolutely it needs to be jumped on. And consequences.
 
Tamatha paul I dunno, it's naive, but there's a lot of pearl clutching from the right. I wish they'd clutch more when it came to fascism and bigotry.

As for the other, no it's not, and I will wait for facts before major judgement on my part.

If there is criminal activity then absolutely it needs to be jumped on. And consequences.
Gol under investigation: ā€˜let’s wait for facts and don’t judge her. Everything is just gossip and slander at this point’

Gol arrested: ā€˜she’s innocent until proven guilty. Nothing to see here’

Gol sentences ā€˜she’s been punished now, old news, nothing to see here’


I don’t know why we even need social media if we can’t talk socially about the issues. They haven’t even been put on here and you’re trying to say we’re slandering people 🤣
 
Well, my original post was ā€œjeez, just read up on Benjamin Doyle šŸ˜”ā€ which you took offence to

I don’t think that qualify as ā€œspreading malicious lies, bigotry and slanderā€

Happy to defend that one in court
No offense was taken on my part. I did interpret the whole comment as such that you believe parts to be true that may not be. Apologies if that's the case
 
Gol under investigation: ā€˜let’s wait for facts and don’t judge her. Everything is just gossip and slander at this point’

Gol arrested: ā€˜she’s innocent until proven guilty. Nothing to see here’

Gol sentences ā€˜she’s been punished now, old news, nothing to see here’


I don’t know why we even need social media if we can’t talk socially about the issues. They haven’t even been put on here and you’re trying to say we’re slandering people 🤣
All three of your opening statements are quite correct
 
Back
Top Bottom