Brian Tamaki being sued for 2 million by some drags queens, should be an entertaining case. Bri has threatened to shut down the country if his demands to legalise only two genders aren't met by December.
Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics
- Thread starter wizard of Tauranga
- Start date
NZWarriors.com
The poor buggers, they need a tax break!!! Let's give them some more money!!!Property certainly generating a lot of wealth, but we're becoming "extremely internationally unusual" apparently
Property investors rake in $500 billion over 30 years
The value of New Zealand's property has increased more than $1.5 trillion in a generation, and investors have been a big winner.www.rnz.co.nz
How many are private and how many are public?
NZWarriors.com
- Thread starter
- #9,704
Imagine if Tamaki and his mob sunk their energy into child abuse that’s rampant in churches instead
Yes. So it’s taking the 2001 number of drs as 100% and showing the relative change to that number
Now you are starting to get it. How many middle managers are employed?
It’s not how much is cut or added, it’s where.
NZWarriors.com
He's more invested in organised crime and the laundry business mateImagine if Tamaki and his mob sunk their energy into child abuse that’s rampant in churches instead
- Thread starter
- #9,708
Talked to him recently.
He used to fell trees for a living before God led him in a different direction. We discussed this as I was cutting down some trees.
Interesting down to earth fellow when he’s not preaching. Trust worthy as a snake in the grass though…
Last edited:
I knew him back when he was a minor crim and Hannah was a meth head. He's amping up the save our children rhetoric now one of his own youth leaders is charged with sex crimes against children. Funny coincidence.
NZWarriors.com
What is corrupt or regressive about a four lane expressway from Warkworth to Whangarei?
As a Far North resident and SUV driver, I will vote for any Party embarking on this long overdue essential connection for our forgotten region.
You’ve never quantified WHERE the money is coming from. You keep screaming UNDERFUNDED & UNDERRESOURCED but you’ve never even proven that assertion.
If it’s a bunch of middle management getting fired , then good.
Sorry, but you've the one assuming things..... I've voted for which party I think would be best for the country at any particular time meaning I've voted for Labour more than any other party over the last 36 years.
Again, I'll ask you the same question you avoided before (just slightly reworded).... why do you think that a CGT on shares is fair when it would negatively affect people saving for their first house when using KiwiSaver as a tool to get their deposit? I'll help you out... a couple on the medium household income of $125,000 PA saving up for a deposit over 15 years using KiwiSaver would have $180,000 saved up for their deposit (if they were in a growth fund with 3% employee and 3% taxed employer contributions at 5% after tax and fees). Since 40% of that is untaxed capital growth in shares meaning $72,000 is currently untaxed but tax that @ 30% and their deposit drops down to $155,000. At an average savings rate of $12,000 PA, and you've just made them wait another three years before they can buy their first house... all because you think a CGT is "fair".
The problem with a CGT is it doesn't just target the "already wealthy and mega landlords" but will keep the middle class locked in. An employee in KiwiSaver on $80,000 PA contributing 3% and their employer also contributing 3% (which then is taxed) in a growth fund at 5% PA after tax and fees (according to the sorted.org calculator) would have just under $235,000 to retire on. Because 40% of that is made up from capital gains on shares, that means that, at the moment, $90,000 is untaxed. By putting a CGT on that, you've just meant this person's weekly income from their KiwiSaver account has dropped from $180.80 PW to $157.70 PW.
An inheritance tax (on estates over $500,000) with the reinstatement of gift duties would be far better at reducing the intergenerational wealth transfer than a CGT. For example, in NZ, the average amount of wealth that each Baby Boomer will transfer between now and 2050 is just over $1.4 million in NZD while, in the US, which has a CGT, the average transfer amount is $1.75 million in NZD per Boomer for that same period. By way of comparison, in the UK which has an inheritance tax, the average amount in NZD that each Boomer will transfer is just over $610,000 after tax.
As for the article you posted, of course tax accountants want a CGT introduced.... it will mean more money for them as they come up with new schemes for the rich to avoid paying it.
What is interesting as that in 2000, the then General Manager for Tax Policy for the IRD, Robin Oliver, prepared a paper on Capital Gains Tax which outlined five key points which any party wanting to have a CGT in their tax policy for an election would need to address. Each time that Labour has since tried to campaign on a CGT, it has only provided information on one of them (shown bolded) while ignoring the rest....
· whether the tax base needs to be indexed for inflation;
· the timing of recognition of gains and the extent to which tax can be levied on anaccrual basis (and if on a realised basis, as is likely, the definition of “disposal” or“ realisation” is critical) and how to account for capital increases through capital expenditure;
· the ambit of any such tax, including the treatment of personal assets such as including residences;
· the treatment of capital losses;
· the appropriate rate of tax.
Think of the third one for a moment. Two identical houses are purchased at the same time by a landlord for the same price (say $600K) in the mid 2010's. He spends $5,000 on each bringing them up to the HHS. One, he doesn't alter but the other he spends $50K putting on an extra bedroom and bathroom. Ten years later, he sells both. The unaltered house has had a capital gain of $150,000 meaning, if the tax rate for a CGT was 33%, he would net $100,000 profit. If the second house had a capital gain of $210,000, he would $140,000 profit. But he hasn't because the added value he added to the house was $50,000.... his real capital gain after tax on a house that went up in value partly on the improvements, he made to it is only $90,000.
But, Labour never gave us any detail on how the value of improvements would work, nor how it would be indexed for inflation, nor the timing of recognition of gains, nor the treatment of capital losses nor the rate that a CGT would be set at.
Until a party is willing to let us know these things BEFORE we vote, I wouldn't vote for them. As much as I dislike a wealth tax (because it's an inefficient way of raising revenue) at least the Greens and the Māori Party gave us enough information to vote on them.... Labour has never done that when campaigning for a CGT.
NZWarriors.com
The same Bernard Hickey, who only six months ago complained we weren't borrowing enough for infrastructure including roads is now complaining that we're building roads.
Is our aversion to debt holding us back? - Asia Pacific Infrastructure
Thanks largely to decades of underinvestment, New Zealand’s government debt is actually quite low, but when faced with a $100 billion infrastructure deficit, The Kaka Editor Bernard Hickey suggests borrowing more could be the fastest and cheapest solution Finance Minister Nicola Willis has again...
www.infrastructurenews.co.nz
Yeah I’m not entirely sure why anyone should consider Bernard Hickey the voice of reason. Just another economist who will jump the fence with his opinions at every opportunity.The same Bernard Hickey, who only six months ago complained we weren't borrowing enough for infrastructure including roads is now complaining that we're building roads.
Is our aversion to debt holding us back? - Asia Pacific Infrastructure
Thanks largely to decades of underinvestment, New Zealand’s government debt is actually quite low, but when faced with a $100 billion infrastructure deficit, The Kaka Editor Bernard Hickey suggests borrowing more could be the fastest and cheapest solution Finance Minister Nicola Willis has again...www.infrastructurenews.co.nz
Wasn't Bruce the Chairman of the Hickey fan club.
NZWarriors.com
At times I wondered if Bruce was Bernard HickeyWasn't Bruce the Chairman of the Hickey fan club.
He certainly wasn't Eric Watson, Jim Doyle or Richard FaleAt times I wondered if Bruce was Bernard Hickey
Try getting a specialist appointment. Try getting a doctor's appointment. People are dying on waiting lists
'Out of control': Numbers waiting too long for specialist appointments reach 60,000
The number of people waiting too long for surgery and treatment is also growing.
At least 85,000 people each year turned away from seeing specialists, some dying as result
One general practitioner said they'd managed a heart patient "into the grave" because she could not get the care she needed.
www.rnz.co.nz
NZWarriors.com
Wow. The right wing posters on here don't like Bernard Hickey. quelle surprise
Probably because he holds power to account. Unlike the right wing echo chambers on here.
Similar threads
Politics
🤡 Donald Trump
