Matiunz
Contributor
Didn’t South’s actually lose the court case but the NRL let them in anyway because of the public backlash?If they overturn that case we might all get what we want, an excuse to kick Souths out of the comp again
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Didn’t South’s actually lose the court case but the NRL let them in anyway because of the public backlash?If they overturn that case we might all get what we want, an excuse to kick Souths out of the comp again
Can't remember the details now, just how great it felt without them.Didn’t South’s actually lose the court case but the NRL let them in anyway because of the public backlash?
Souths lost the first case, took it to a higher court and won as I recall. But maybe once people who didn't even like Souths ("come on, NRL, let the Rabbitohs back in, they're shit and it means we can win at least one game a season!" logic talking?) joined the campaign to get them back in, the NRL may have gone "Ah, fuck it, it's not worth the aggro!" and they didn't really argue the case as hard as they might have...Didn’t South’s actually lose the court case but the NRL let them in anyway because of the public backlash?
The biggest crimes the RL overlords committed was reducing the number of clubs down from 22 across both comps in 97 down to ultimately 14 in 2000
View: https://youtu.be/BnKw_iLfngY