The NRL are probably looking at the American systems and thinking that would make nice television and a bit more ratings.
If all of the clubs, players, the players association got onboard it could work.
For clubs like the Warriors you could be strategic and get players in positions we struggle to recruit or develop stars. The halves would be a good example. Although at the moment we have
Boyd,
Metcalf, Hanson, Cleary as Australians on our books. Two of those are more the younger development side of things.
The three different premiers in 8 years is thrown off with Penrith currently on 4 in a row. Winning two in a row hadn't happened for a long time until the Roosters did it a few years ago. So, the stat is skewed a bit.
It is a rookie draft. I'd prefer the current system. Especially if we go down the development path seriously. We may get some good players under a draft but we would also be at risk of losing the following for example if it was in place
Leiataua,
Laban, Vaimauga (Sifakula),
Halasima,
Zyon Maiu’u. They may not end up being superstars but there is enough talent there for us to build a side from and recruit positions we need.
The national under 21s would be more beneficial when you look at the brief. How young players come into the NRL. If it ran the same time frame as the old under 21s it would get pretty expensive having an NRL side, NRLW, Under 21s followed by a NSW Cup or Queensland Cup side.