Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’ve got a bit more respect for the Storm as they win through masterful coaching and developing talent.This is like choosing between a stale turd sandwich or a fresh turd sandwich. Have to go the Rorters as having the Storm go out without winning a game in the finals will keep me happy for months.
I have always seen Bellamy as the master of negative tactics and cap cheating but each to their own.I’ve got a bit more respect for the Storm as they win through masterful coaching and developing talent.
The Roosters just buy their success.
Storm for me.
You mean all that wrestling stuff like we trained up on at the start of this year?I have always seen Bellamy as the master of negative tactics and cap cheating but each to their own.
Who’s needs a sombrero when u have boats!You mean all that wrestling stuff like we trained up on at the start of this year?
I agree they push the rules negatively at times but there game is based on fitness, structure, skill and intelligent play.
Not that I’m a fan boy or anything but I respect that more than the Roosters sombrero.
Just had a multi with the TABGut feel says close game, don't know why. Roosters are massive underdogs but could still pull off a win?
Loads of injuriesDon't really have a dog in this one as I can't decide which one losing would satisfy me more. Keen to see a good game. It's gonna be a filthy one
What would be the potential return?Just had a multi with the TAB
Roosters and Warriors at $4.57.
Roosters nearly $3.00
$150 approx.What would be the potential return?
Good luck$150 approx.
Not a huge bet
Cheers mate.Good luck![]()
I was thinking similar, maybe I'll go either tram 1-12 + warriors head to head.Just had a multi with the TAB
Roosters and Warriors at $4.57.
Roosters nearly $3.00
That would be the story to publish unwanted storm rake ends Storms worst playoff performance.Probably go roosters just because cheese v grant.