General Mt Smart Stadium

NZWarriors.com
Looks like it is down to Eden Park vs one of the other options, Te Toangaroa. The other two won't be presented to councilors.

A couple of things to me that stand out.

Now we are on to Eden Park 2.1 instead of 2.0. The Eden Park option can be funded without ratepayer investment. That one gave me a laugh.

The other one only 973 people attended an NPC game at Eden Park.

 
It looks like eden park is going to win which is disappointing, a brand new stadium at the waterfront would have been preferred no neighbors complaining & including more sports & concerts
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
I'm going to be so pissed if Auckland screws this up again.
I haven't see any good reason why Eden Park would be the better option.

The only silver lining is that Auckland FC's billionaire owner has talked about building a 20k~ stadium. And not having a Waterfront stadium with a club mode adds to his need for a boutique stadium.
Hopefully the Warriors get in his ear and ask him to increase the capacity slightly and the two clubs can go it alone with a brand new fir for purpose stadium.
 
I'm going to be so pissed if Auckland screws this up again.
I haven't see any good reason why Eden Park would be the better option.

The only silver lining is that Auckland FC's billionaire owner has talked about building a 20k~ stadium. And not having a Waterfront stadium with a club mode adds to his need for a boutique stadium.
Hopefully the Warriors get in his ear and ask him to increase the capacity slightly and the two clubs can go it alone with a brand new fir for purpose stadium.
What would really screw over AC is if the Warriors joined in with the AFC waterfront stadium and abandoned Mt Smart in favour of a 25,000-30,000 roofed stadium. That would leave AC with four stadiums and the main tenants from the only one that makes a profit gone. Oh, the irony of it all!!!
 
Looks like it is down to Eden Park vs one of the other options, Te Toangaroa. The other two won't be presented to councilors.

A couple of things to me that stand out.

Now we are on to Eden Park 2.1 instead of 2.0. The Eden Park option can be funded without ratepayer investment. That one gave me a laugh.

The other one only 973 people attended an NPC game at Eden Park.

Shockingly low support for the Blues too - they couldn't fill Mount Smart!
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
For anyone who is interested, here is the latest update of the construction of Te Kaha stadium in Christchurch.
When you drive past you get a great understanding of the scale of the build.
It’s going to be quite impressive.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0pst_EYfSw

As a Christchurch local, I am so excited to have this stadium being built in the CBD. It was a bit of a blessing in hindsight that the old Lancaster park was destroyed in the earthquake, if it didn't we wouldn't have a world class cricket ground at Hagley and Te Kaha would only be a dream.
 
I'm going to be so pissed if Auckland screws this up again.
I haven't see any good reason why Eden Park would be the better option.

The only silver lining is that Auckland FC's billionaire owner has talked about building a 20k~ stadium. And not having a Waterfront stadium with a club mode adds to his need for a boutique stadium.
Hopefully the Warriors get in his ear and ask him to increase the capacity slightly and the two clubs can go it alone with a brand new fir for purpose stadium.
You would think building a new stadium downtown would be the way to go. While that's being built you still have Eden park to use for sports and concerts. Hopefully they don't fuck this up but you just know they will end up going with Eden park upgrade and it will be largely an unusable eyesore for three years until it's completed.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
You would think building a new stadium downtown would be the way to go. While that's being built you still have Eden park to use for sports and concerts. Hopefully they don't fuck this up but you just know they will end up going with Eden park upgrade and it will be largely an unusable eyesore for three years until it's completed.
Nothing surer
 
Why do they want to get going ASAP? Because the British and Ireland Lions are coming to NZ in 2029 so if they don't get underway with either the Eden Park upgrade or a new Stadium soon, it wouldn't be ready in time.

Perhaps it's time for Graham Darlow to rejoin FCL.... he's probably the only one I'd trust to over see the construction in time. Although I worked for Fletchers before he arrived, and, while he was there had been contracted by Fletchers a few times, I never met him but, going by his reputation, and no shit attitude, I can't think of anyone else capable of pulling it off.
 
Last edited:
Why do they want to get going ASAP? Because the British and Ireland Lions are coming to NZ in 2029 so if they don't get underway with either the Eden Park upgrade or a new Stadium soon, it wouldn't be ready in time.

Perhaps it's time for Graham Darlow to rejoin FCL.... he's properly the only one I'd trust to oversea the construction in time. Although I worked for Fletchers before he arrived, and, while he was there had been contracted by Fletchers a few times, I never met him but, going by his reputation, and no shit attitude, I can't think of anyone else capable of pulling it off.
I dealt with Graham when the port was undergoing dredging many years ago.
Impressive guy. No fuckin around. No drama.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account

Auckland stadiums: First look at Wynyard Point proposal ahead of formal vote​

image.jpg


The final horse in the Auckland stadium race has been revealed visually.

A stadium and entertainment precinct at Wynyard Point, encompassing a main 55,000-seat stadium, an indoor arena and an outdoor amphitheatre to view harbour events like SailGP, is the fourth proposal that will be voted on next month.

It joins Eden Park 2.1, a redevelopment option of the current national stadium; a waterfront stadium precinct at Quay Park or Te Tōangaroa, backed by New Zealand Rugby and including an All Blacks-branded hotel; and a fully enclosed stadium sunk into the Waitematā Harbour with a floating roof above sea level.

Wynyard Point consortium head Richard Dellabarca told Newstalk ZB’s Elliott Smith that the current set-up of four stadiums (Eden Park, Go Media Stadium Mt Smart, North Harbour Stadium and Western Springs) was unsustainable.

He made the point that Melbourne had 10 Australian Rules teams, yet used just two stadiums to host their fixtures.

“From a fiscal perspective, it makes no sense to continue with the four stadiums. I think the other thing is, from a customer experience perspective, if you go overseas, look at Suncorp [in Brisbane] last night: 52,000 fans, rectangular stadium, what an amazing atmosphere. We just don’t have that.”

He believes the Wynyard Point proposal is clearly the best available and the most cost-effective.

“It’s one of the best sites in the world. We’ve got the best stadium designers in the world. The reason they’ve joined us is because they think this is an amazing site, one of the best they’ve seen in the world, and they have the ability to create something really iconic for New Zealand.

“It’s the lowest-cost site to build on. It doesn’t have the complexity of Quay Park and it doesn’t sit in the middle of a densely populated suburb, Mt Eden [where Eden Park sits]. So you’ve got the double whammy of an iconic site and actually at the lowest-cost site to build.”

 

Auckland stadiums: First look at Wynyard Point proposal ahead of formal vote​

image.jpg


The final horse in the Auckland stadium race has been revealed visually.

A stadium and entertainment precinct at Wynyard Point, encompassing a main 55,000-seat stadium, an indoor arena and an outdoor amphitheatre to view harbour events like SailGP, is the fourth proposal that will be voted on next month.

It joins Eden Park 2.1, a redevelopment option of the current national stadium; a waterfront stadium precinct at Quay Park or Te Tōangaroa, backed by New Zealand Rugby and including an All Blacks-branded hotel; and a fully enclosed stadium sunk into the Waitematā Harbour with a floating roof above sea level.

Wynyard Point consortium head Richard Dellabarca told Newstalk ZB’s Elliott Smith that the current set-up of four stadiums (Eden Park, Go Media Stadium Mt Smart, North Harbour Stadium and Western Springs) was unsustainable.

He made the point that Melbourne had 10 Australian Rules teams, yet used just two stadiums to host their fixtures.

“From a fiscal perspective, it makes no sense to continue with the four stadiums. I think the other thing is, from a customer experience perspective, if you go overseas, look at Suncorp [in Brisbane] last night: 52,000 fans, rectangular stadium, what an amazing atmosphere. We just don’t have that.”

He believes the Wynyard Point proposal is clearly the best available and the most cost-effective.

“It’s one of the best sites in the world. We’ve got the best stadium designers in the world. The reason they’ve joined us is because they think this is an amazing site, one of the best they’ve seen in the world, and they have the ability to create something really iconic for New Zealand.

“It’s the lowest-cost site to build on. It doesn’t have the complexity of Quay Park and it doesn’t sit in the middle of a densely populated suburb, Mt Eden [where Eden Park sits]. So you’ve got the double whammy of an iconic site and actually at the lowest-cost site to build.”

Thats sexy as fuck.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Back
Top