Because it doesn't fit with the neoliberal rightStuff: Latest breaking news | New Zealand
www.stuff.co.nz
cruel-or-crucial-simon-bridges-demands-urgent-clear-out-cbd-vagrants
Why can't we solve the problem rather than sweep it under the carpet?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because it doesn't fit with the neoliberal rightStuff: Latest breaking news | New Zealand
www.stuff.co.nz
cruel-or-crucial-simon-bridges-demands-urgent-clear-out-cbd-vagrants
Why can't we solve the problem rather than sweep it under the carpet?
The politics you and others on the right here endorse are a major cause of homelessness.NZ spends nearly half a billion dollars on homelessness. That number has been steadily increasing. Please look into global empirical evidence. California spent $20B on homelessness and the rate doubled. Now they are blocking audits into where the money went.
As I said, asylums and harsher sentencing for vagrant criminals. That would solve 75% of the issue, less than the 93% estimated by the US DEA
Neoliberalism.Well nothing is happening so the status quo stays.
The problem is they aren't getting help and homelessness is getting more. Wellington 15 years ago was essentially blanket man and a couple of others. There are heaps now.
I think money is one thing. We are spending a lot on accommodation but perhaps not enough on long term solutions and/or preventions.Yeah I think the mental health angle needs a lot more work
I imagine a lot of these people should actually be in proper care facilities
What's my solution? I'd tidy up the ACC system and reallocate a lot of funding to mental health care facilities. ACC is leaky as f*ck, and a lot of that health money should be better spent on fixing health, rather than massages for sprains
Yeah. I don't know how this wins him any votes. Australians pension is 67 and a few other countries too. Didn't France raise theirs from 63 to 65 and caused chaos?View attachment 17268
Seems like this will be unpopular on top of nationalβs unpopularity. Credit for being transparent but I donβt think itβs going to be a vote winner and completely against Winstonβs wishes I would imagine
TBF Winston will be critical of Luxon and National on every possible until the electionView attachment 17268
Seems like this will be unpopular on top of nationalβs unpopularity. Credit for being transparent but I donβt think itβs going to be a vote winner and completely against Winstonβs wishes I would imagine
I think it will go up in time but I donβt see Luxon as the one to sell itYeah. I don't know how this wins him any votes. Australians pension is 67 and a few other countries too. Didn't France raise theirs from 63 to 65 and caused chaos?
65 is already old enough man.
This is a dilemma for my generation, not enough taxpayers to support us in our dotage.I think it will go up in time but I donβt see Luxon as the one to sell it
The other idea I had this arvo is super harsh penalties on super harsh penalties on kiddy fiddlers / domestic abusers etc, and making it easier to report. Somehow stop people growing up with abuse problems. So they donβt turn to drink / drugs later in lifeI think money is one thing. We are spending a lot on accommodation but perhaps not enough on long term solutions and/or preventions.
I would love a bipartisan bill around mental health. It shouldn't just be one government giving one charity (I am hope) a wad of cash. There are many ways to help and if there are many avenues to seek help. Hopefully those people get the support.
Mitey. JKs in school program is a bit wishy washy and needs refinement. Voices of Hope do great things but undervalued.
Youthline needs more funding etc etc.
Good on him for actually having the gumption to recognise the ticking clockView attachment 17268
Seems like this will be unpopular on top of nationalβs unpopularity. Credit for being transparent but I donβt think itβs going to be a vote winner and completely against Winstonβs wishes I would imagine
Still a while away. Certainly wonβt be there by the time I get there if Iβm fortunate enoughThis is a dilemma for my generation, not enough taxpayers to support us in our dotage.
How many years are you away from retiring your paint brush Rembrandt?
Yes itβs 67 in AusYeah. I don't know how this wins him any votes. Australians pension is 67 and a few other countries too. Didn't France raise theirs from 63 to 65 and caused chaos?
65 is already old enough man.
That should be the first avenue NZ explores. Itβs funny in NZ, thereβs a feeling of entitlement that are placed upon some yet our pm took a clean car subsidy and learnt mΔori on the taxpayer before scrapping them despite being someone who could comfortably foot the bill. Would be interesting to see who stomped their feet if means testing was employed?Plus itβs means (income) and asset tested