Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com

Property market is artificially inflated by all the renters recieving hundreds p/week in Accommodation Supplement, and indirectly through Working for Families topping up wages. Property investors and banks being the major beneficiaries. Do I have that right?
Well, you could say food prices are artificially inflated by beneficiaries and pensioners getting paid to eat with that outlook… 😉
 

View: https://bsky.app/profile/australiainstitute.org.au/post/3lqbgnogjgc2c


‘The Federal Govt gives over $33 bn in tax concessions to the richest 10% through CGTD + super.’

Lol… it’s like the state is ENTITLED to our money and they are doing us a favour it they don’t hammer us for as much as possible.

Real communist outlook there… I mean if they just took everything from everyone, imagine how much they could spend 🙄

Can you break down those discounts with the rational behind it (eg the CGT discount is probably to account for inflation)
 
Some elderly Russians remember the late Soviet era with nostalgia, everyone had a home and a job, even if it was in a gulag.
I recall watching a doco a year or so ago about the USSR after the wall came down. It was focusing on the rural areas and how once the state had disintegrated and there was no infrastructure for the people out in the sticks to get help.
Especially medical as all the doctors and trained staff had buggered off to the west.

They had been reliant for so long on state intervention that once it was no no longer there they were quite bereft.

Was quite poignant.
 
I recall watching a doco a year or so ago about the USSR after the wall came down. It was focusing on the rural areas and how once the state had disintegrated and there was no infrastructure for the people out in the sticks to get help.
Especially medical as all the doctors and trained staff had buggered off to the west.

They had been reliant for so long on state intervention that once it was no no longer there they were quite bereft.

Was quite poignant.
Rich 1%er like doctors have options?

Our mate on here says you can just hammer them as much as possible and there will be no consequences 🤔

So a USSR style wealth tax wouldn’t work you reckon?
 
Oh right, I wasn't against them. Just wondering what would happen to the housing market if we cut the accommodation supplement.
In all seriousness, your right, it has allowed rents to rise.

But the alternative would be employed workers will be able to continually outbid the fixed income beneficiaries and they would eventually end up unable to match workers and homeless.

It would create haves and have nots.

What do you do?
 
In all seriousness, your right, it has allowed rents to rise.

But the alternative would be employed workers will be able to continually outbid the fixed income beneficiaries and they would eventually end up unable to match workers and homeless.

It would create haves and have nots.

What do you do?
I'd say it's impossible to remove them now because it would crash the economy and most rentals would halve in capital value overnight.
 
I'd say it's impossible to remove them now because it would crash the economy and most rentals would halve in capital value overnight.
You could cap them and inflate rent until they are insignificant over time.

If you crashed the market, landlords would switch to air B&B or leave them vacant exploding homelessness.

House values are tied to the cost to build a new house.
 
I’m not opposed to a well done CGT if income tax was lowered by the same amount.

However the last Labour proposal was the highest rate in the world and didn’t account for inflation. The Greens Wealth tax is almost double Norways which was a failure. The brightline test was unique in the world and killed the entire property market. The brightline tax ended up 5x the original.

I simply don’t trust Labour to be fair and reasonable. Especially when they use a trumped up 300 targeted people assessment of the wealthiest individuals and extrapolate that to everyone as the basis for it.

No credibility, sorry.
 
Poo Midas

Quite juvenile, I know, but it is a great insult
Let’s see if it will stick…

What about this quote from Seymour:

“I’m actually providing a huge public service because I’m providing the left, the losers, and many in the media ... with something they desperately need after their election loss, and that is someone to blame. You’re welcome.”

He’s on fire and the lefts going to be coming at him and giving him even more publicity now 🤣
 
In all honesty, does anyone seriously think Hipkins is going to be the leader at the next election? Damages goods isn’t he?

I actually like the guy, he just can’t get anything achieved. All talk and little else.

Peter saying he won’t work with Hipkins next election but not ruling out Labour is the kiss of death isn’t it?
 
Back
Top Bottom