Death is a portion of circumference on the wheel of lifeIf you don't have death, life would lose it's meaning.
Jesus wept, some heavy shit going down now on the Thirsty Thursday
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.
Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence
Death is a portion of circumference on the wheel of lifeIf you don't have death, life would lose it's meaning.
Not even any respite from cruel reality in the NRL because of that boring shitfest last night.Death is a portion of circumference on the wheel of life
Jesus wept, some heavy shit going down now on the Thirsty Thursday
Some elderly Russians remember the late Soviet era with nostalgia, everyone had a home and a job, even if it was in a gulag.To correlate that, the only real answer to the housing problem is for the state to build mega accommodation blocks a la Soviet era, house everyone and repress the individual spirit.
Tough Gig
Well, you could say food prices are artificially inflated by beneficiaries and pensioners getting paid to eat with that outlook…Property market is artificially inflated by all the renters recieving hundreds p/week in Accommodation Supplement, and indirectly through Working for Families topping up wages. Property investors and banks being the major beneficiaries. Do I have that right?
View: https://bsky.app/profile/australiainstitute.org.au/post/3lqbgnogjgc2c
![]()
The super tax debate is divorced from reality – and more proof that Australia’s tax system is built for the rich | Greg Jericho
The proposal will affect only 0.5% of people with superannuation and yet you would think the government is about to seize the means of productionwww.theguardian.com
Is that what you say at your dinner table wizWell, you could say food prices are artificially inflated by beneficiaries and pensioners getting paid to eat with that outlook…![]()
I’m for targeted assistance (eg housing money so they can pay me more rent). I was highlighting that it was you against poor, helpless beneficiaries living a reasonable standard of likeIs that what you say at your dinner table wiz
I recall watching a doco a year or so ago about the USSR after the wall came down. It was focusing on the rural areas and how once the state had disintegrated and there was no infrastructure for the people out in the sticks to get help.Some elderly Russians remember the late Soviet era with nostalgia, everyone had a home and a job, even if it was in a gulag.
Rich 1%er like doctors have options?I recall watching a doco a year or so ago about the USSR after the wall came down. It was focusing on the rural areas and how once the state had disintegrated and there was no infrastructure for the people out in the sticks to get help.
Especially medical as all the doctors and trained staff had buggered off to the west.
They had been reliant for so long on state intervention that once it was no no longer there they were quite bereft.
Was quite poignant.
Oh right, I wasn't against them. Just wondering what would happen to the housing market if we scrapped the accommodation supplement.I’m for targeted assistance (eg housing money so they can pay me more rent). I was highlighting that it was you against poor, helpless beneficiaries living a reasonable standard of like![]()
In all seriousness, your right, it has allowed rents to rise.Oh right, I wasn't against them. Just wondering what would happen to the housing market if we cut the accommodation supplement.
I'd say it's impossible to remove them now because it would crash the economy and most rentals would halve in capital value overnight.In all seriousness, your right, it has allowed rents to rise.
But the alternative would be employed workers will be able to continually outbid the fixed income beneficiaries and they would eventually end up unable to match workers and homeless.
It would create haves and have nots.
What do you do?
You could cap them and inflate rent until they are insignificant over time.I'd say it's impossible to remove them now because it would crash the economy and most rentals would halve in capital value overnight.
I don't even think you could cap it, investment would be unsustainable if rents can't rise with inflation.You could cap them and inflate rent until they are insignificant over time.
If you crashed the market, landlords would switch to air B&B or leave them vacant exploding homelessness.
House values are tied to the cost to build a new house.
I’m not opposed to a well done CGT if income tax was lowered by the same amount.![]()
On Wealth Taxes And Capital Flight
In the wake of the Greens’ alternative Budget – and the criticism levelled at it – it seems pretty obvious that when it comes to tax policy, Labour’s only election campaign concession to left wing voters is going to be a capital gains tax ...www.scoop.co.nz
Without the subsidies half the working population would move to Aussie and we'd have abandoned cities of air B&B's. The whole system's a house of cards.If you crashed the market, landlords would switch to air B&B or leave them vacant exploding homelessness.
Let’s see if it will stick…Poo Midas
Quite juvenile, I know, but it is a great insult