Sowell would call that welfare. And point out it makes everyone poorer
Sure as shit making the Dragons win record poorer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.
Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence
Sowell would call that welfare. And point out it makes everyone poorer
Not a good look for our Deputy PM .Mouthing off at a heckler while decrying the standards in the House.when the man was heard saying "you're a load of bollocks, Winston". Peters replied "you look like bollocks, go look in the mirror sunshine". Then the heckler replied "you're a tosser".
The pair started yelling at each other, with Peters yelling "naff off".
“You’re 80 years old now, isn’t it time you naffed off,” the heckler responded. Peters replied: "So it's an age thing, is it? You look older than I do".
Ole Winnie still got it.
Yeah I think the heckler got the point across that many would agree. We can be thankful it wasn’t another politician making the remark or us taxpayers would be footing another defamation case on behalf of WinstonNot a good look for our Deputy PM .Mouthing off at a heckler while decrying the standards in the House.
Their campaign to attract police, nurses and the like suggests it’s not just the untrained and unqualified with NZ struggling to recruit in these two areas for instanceThere are more non professional people leaving for Oz as it has always been. The untrained, unqualified have way more lucrative job opportunities in Australia then here. Nothing has changed. If Australia has a general wage difference of +25% and you are on the bones of your arse here, why wouldn't you go? As approx 600k have.
That's true, there will always be trained or professional people going as well but the numbers of others is also large. 600k is a lot of punters. Having 10 or 11% of our population sitting over there is not a good look for the country overall.Their campaign to attract police, nurses and the like suggests it’s not just the untrained and unqualified with NZ struggling to recruit in these two areas for instance
The main thing I miss is the weather.As I get older winter hits me hard here.That's true, there will always be trained or professional people going as well but the numbers of others is also large. 600k is a lot of punters. Having 10 or 11% of our population sitting over there is not a good look for the country overall.
Australia has always as far back as I can remember been a place for better remuneration than NZ. Everyone has their reasons for going and yes, money (and conditions) is a big driver. So is my fear of snakes and deadly spiders.
As mentioned yesterday, many return so it’s the factors you mentioned that we can address on missing their contributions throughout their working careers. Of course we can’t change the weather and some of the things that make it more attractive for some, but it’s tough for the average Kiwi when immigration is used to fill positions in some sectors and the immigrants are prepared to work for lower wages than the NZer and keeps wages low. Some would argue that the employer will hire who’s best for the role, but being in the trades, the attitude I’ve encountered often is that money talks whether the job will be up to the same standard or notThat's true, there will always be trained or professional people going as well but the numbers of others is also large. 600k is a lot of punters. Having 10 or 11% of our population sitting over there is not a good look for the country overall.
Australia has always as far back as I can remember been a place for better remuneration than NZ. Everyone has their reasons for going and yes, money (and conditions) is a big driver. So is my fear of snakes and deadly spiders.
That's because you choose to live in the cold and damp of Tauranga..... you need to shift down to InvercargillThe main thing I miss is the weather.As I get older winter hits me hard here.
Is that you Bruce??That's because you choose to live in the cold and damp of Tauranga..... you need to shift down to Invercargill![]()
Bruce was only jealous!!!Is that you Bruce??
He used to call Tauranga gods waiting room.![]()
![]()
From the article - it also said she sought examples of the minimum punishment
Ironic today the Deputy PM Winston is kicked out of the House & straight after Shane Jones got a very stern warning from the speaker.From the article - it also said she sought examples of the minimum punishment
Wow such racism and misogyny Maybe. All because she's Indian women.
Hypocrisy from the so called leaders of free speech. Libertarian bullshit.Wow such racism and misogyny Maybe. All because she's Indian women.
Probably needed a fagIronic today the Deputy PM Winston is kicked out of the House & straight after Shane Jones got a very stern warning from the speaker.
Free speech doesn't mean free from consequence.Hypocrisy from the so called leaders of free speech. Libertarian bullshit.
A hard right government displaying autocratic behaviour.
Agree on the free speech doesn't mean free from consequence.Free speech doesn't mean free from consequence.
And they aren't being called to task for what they said but how they went about it, which is against long standing rules that are there to prevent intimidation and disruption in the house.
After the way his day started its probably a fag and a grumpy pill.Probably needed a fag