Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com

My kids are moving away to university and will be living inner city in student accomodation.

It’s dwelled in me, city giving is inherently communal - limited living space with your living, commuting, entertainment, etc in shared space. It is a left lifestyle where you rely on others to provide most of your living requirements.

University students are generally left leaning. City’s are usually left leaning.

By contrast, I’ve always lived in the city fringe where my living and entertainment are provided more within my own home, my transport is via my own efforts, etc. aligns more individual responsibility and ‘right’.

Just an interesting observation and highlights to me how neither are right or wrong, just a product of differing experiences of life.
 
My kids are moving away to university and will be living inner city in student accomodation.

It’s dwelled in me, city giving is inherently communal - limited living space with your living, commuting, entertainment, etc in shared space. It is a left lifestyle where you rely on others to provide most of your living requirements.

University students are generally left leaning. City’s are usually left leaning.

By contrast, I’ve always lived in the city fringe where my living and entertainment are provided more within my own home, my transport is via my own efforts, etc. aligns more individual responsibility and ‘right’.

Just an interesting observation and highlights to me how neither are right or wrong, just a product of differing experiences of life.
Isn't that more a matter of income, students being mostly poor?
 
Isn't that more a matter of income, students being mostly poor?
Somewhat but no.

More supply and demand.

Limited space so houses are smaller, no car parks, no living areas, no indoor outdoor flow.

‘Economics’ dictate that via limited supply of space we must be more communal and share.

The higher the density the more left voters tend to be.

Auckland and Wellington CBD have both gone greens and I can see the reasoning from those voters perspective.

Ultimately a left leaning inner cities and right leaning rest of us would be perfect but it doesn’t work that way where one side or the other must rule us all.
 
Last edited:
Well obviously there’s no point to anything in the biggest picture (unless we believe in God).

But on a scale where we look at consequences of actions then actions can be meaningful?
We assign meaning to our actions, whether they have any significance to the wider universe, who knows. Unless there's a creator who made us in it's own image as you say.
 
Somewhat but no.

More supply and demand.

Limited space so houses are smaller, no car parks, no living areas, no indoor outdoor flow.

‘Economics’ dictate that via limited supply of space we must be more communal and share.

The higher the density the more left voters tend to be.

Auckland and Wellington CBD have both gone greens and I can see the reasoning from those voters perspective.

Ultimately a left leaning inner cities and right leaning rest of us would be perfect but it doesn’t work that way where one side or the other must rule us all.
On students though, if someone is studying physics, engineering, medicine, whatever, why would they necessarily be left/right voters because of their student accommodation?
 
I understand MBIE has spent $4million on a project gathering the sounds of sperm whales and playing the recordings in forest areas with kauri dieback. This also may be a way to halt the spread of Myrtle Rust. Evidently, sperm whales and kauri trees have a connection according to māori folklore and this 'indigenous science' should be used along with 'colonial science'.
Appears the money was paid to a not for profit organisation headed by a women responsible for the funding.
If we are not already, we will be the laughing stock of the world.
 
I understand MBIE has spent $4million on a project gathering the sounds of sperm whales and playing the recordings in forest areas with kauri dieback. This also may be a way to halt the spread of Myrtle Rust. Evidently, sperm whales and kauri trees have a connection according to māori folklore and this 'indigenous science' should be used along with 'colonial science'.
Appears the money was paid to a not for profit organisation headed by a women responsible for the funding.
If we are not already, we will be the laughing stock of the world.
Well. This needs a citation thanks Dean.
 
you are already...
I was hoping we hadn't been noticed by too many people but I think you are right.
Watched a podcast/interview in front of a live audience the other day. Started by asking Richard Dawkins about his māori view on science. It was embarrassing hearing him tell the story of Scientists here being shut down by their Universities and him unwelcome to speak at same Universities because he supported our proper scientists questioning of adopting māori folklore as part of our tertiary science curriculum.
 
Back
Top Bottom