Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.
Yeah maybe we do need fear of gods for social engineering, wish there was a better way. The Enlightenment in Europe was a rejection of medieval superstition though, before that it was pretty grim under the yoke of popes and Enquisitors. Have you taken the leap of faith to believe in the religion or are you just coming around to it as a tool of social control?
Then there’s the ones that turn up to church on Sunday or a confessional and think alls forgiven for the shitty person they are during the week
 

NZWarriors.com

There has been a significant reconfiguring of society

Pro: Solo parenting; mass immigration, pro multi-ethnicity, mental health dealt with in the community, working mothers, etc.

All a significant change from ‘the good old days’ trying a social experiment that’s altered what worked well in the past.

Are we overall better off with these liberal individual rights, even though there’s high profile people that fall through the cracks?

All not really voted on either. Who’s behind this agenda @Worried2Death?
People wanting rights are behind it I guess. The good old days was 6 o'clock swill and home to beat the wife & kids who had no escape because there was no DPB. Holy shit, maybe the patriarchy really is the problem?
 
Two major things lead to my reconsideration of the church this year.

1. The most common phrase in the bible is “Do Not Be Afraid” and I then I realised Jesus is the OG motivational speaker.

2. 25% of all pregnancies are aborted and not a single abortion has ever been needed to save a life woman’s life.
1. He said love your enemy and turn the other cheek. Are you going to become a pacifist conscientious objector?

2. Need a source on none of them being necessary to save the mother's life
 
Yeah maybe we do need fear of gods for social engineering, wish there was a better way. The Enlightenment in Europe was a rejection of medieval superstition though, before that it was pretty grim under the yoke of popes and Enquisitors. Have you taken the leap of faith to believe in the religion or are you just coming around to it as a tool of social control?
Both. The science stuff I'm reading doesn't eliminate it. Some functions of the church and faith seem incredibly useful. From counselling to therapy even confession have tangible psychological benefits. Even the dam parables were good lessons for children to learn when growing up.

Every bad thing I learnt about the church turned to be a lie ( apart from the paedo thing). Conquest of South America was benevolent, the Aztecs were horrific (Cortez story is wild (600vs1m). Same with Africa, and most other places they went. From human sacrifice to cannibalization , the church fought to eliminate this. Even the Crusades was to pacify the Muslims and Jews who were up to to much mischief.
 
My wife says I spend all offseason talking total shit about things I know nothing about until I can start talking shit about the Warriors again. She keeps me grounded.
My wife says I spend all offseason talking total shit about things I know nothing about until I can start talking shit about the Warriors again. She keeps me grounded.
Off season has no limitations on here.
 
Both. The science stuff I'm reading doesn't eliminate it. Some functions of the church and faith seem incredibly useful. From counselling to therapy even confession have tangible psychological benefits. Even the dam parables were good lessons for children to learn when growing up.

Every bad thing I learnt about the church turned to be a lie ( apart from the paedo thing). Conquest of South America was benevolent, the Aztecs were horrific (Cortez story is wild (600vs1m). Same with Africa, and most other places they went. From human sacrifice to cannibalization , the church fought to eliminate this. Even the Crusades was to pacify the Muslims and Jews who were up to to much mischief.
Could all be true. But do you believe that Jewish troublemaker was a messiah who rose from the dead?
 
1. He said love your enemy and turn the other cheek. Are you going to become a pacifist conscientious objector?

2. Need a source on none of them being necessary to save the mother's life
Matthew 5:38-40
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well.

You take the meaning of this to be that you are never to fight?
 
Matthew 5:38-40
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well.

You take the meaning of this to be that you are never to fight?
What do you do if someone slaps you
 
Back
Top Bottom