Worried2Death
Contributor
Not now he's a christian, he'll give me his shirt and let me slap him againIf you slap MrFrankWhite in a dream you better wake up and apologize
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Not now he's a christian, he'll give me his shirt and let me slap him againIf you slap MrFrankWhite in a dream you better wake up and apologize
Semantics. You don't know what reality is anymore than anyone else does though, and we never will.But if I believe that reality = God, then I guess anything is possible.
Did you miss the word "believe"?Semantics. You don't know what reality is anymore than anyone else does though, and we never will.
Believing things doesn't make them soDid you miss the word "believe"
It does in the eye of the believer though doesn't it?Believing things doesn't make them so
The opposite of Jesus' teachings
That doesn't invalidate my statement. If I personally believe that reality = God, then believing in Jesus is hardly a massive leap. Unsure how you deviate from that to me unable to conclusively prove the existence of God...Believing things doesn't make them so
Wow the first Christian to ever do that . Plus its a joke.The opposite of Jesus' teachings
Using God as a placeholder for "Reality" is totally semantic. I call reality God sometimes too but I'm an atheist pretty much, it renders the word meaningless if God has the divine and interventionist properties that most people of faith claim.That doesn't invalidate my statement. If I personally believe that reality = God, then believing in Jesus is hardly a massive leap. Unsure how you deviate from that to me unable to conclusively prove the existence of God...
You're not going to send your unit after me for heresy or anything are you?Wow the first Christian to ever do that . Plus its a joke.
Maces are far too inefficient
Yep, I envy the peace of mind it gives to the pious in a cold godless universe.It does in the eye of the believer though doesn't it?
Yes but not entirely against the bibles.The opposite of Jesus' teachings
Rubbish. You dont understand the concept clearly. Fine if you disagree with the premise, but to grossly miscategorise it and dismiss it is out of pocket.Using God as a placeholder for "Reality" is totally semantic. I call reality God sometimes too but I'm an atheist pretty much, it renders the word meaningless if God has the divine and interventionist properties that most people of faith claim.
Concept of what, God?Rubbish. You dont understand the concept clearly.
Bronze age barbarian tribes and their Abrahamic sky daddies are your guides now?Yes but not entirely against the bibles.
Genesis 14 onwards.
is that worse than a troublemaking jew?Bronze age barbarian tribes and their Abrahamic sky daddies are your guides now?
Ahh spoken like a true non believer would. What a conundrumYep, I envy the peace of mind it gives to the pious in a cold godless universe.
That guy hated the temples being used as tax collectors for the Romans, cost him his life but ironically the Romans later found those Gospels to be a very effective opiate and tool of social control, baptism/mindwashing/brainwashingis that worse than a troublemaking jew?
Why did he love them? Because they were the most sinful, their profession was the most shameful. But through repentance and ABANDONING their sin, they could be saved.I'd say whoever owns Onlyfans is the culprit there. Prostitution was rife in the New Testament, rabbi Yesu loved them.