- Thread starter
- #12,821
So in the treaty, what were the principles? Who can define them? how was co-governance ever bought into it? With what authority?How can you unilaterally change a contract? Don't both parties need to agree changes?
Can only the Queen and those original 500 māori define them?
If it was between māori and the England (the treaty made māori English subjects). Where is the NZ govt in all this?
Doesn’t the govt represent māori, the queen and all of us through elections? Don’t more māori voting for National than voted for the māori party give the incumbent govt a mandate to govern?
Again, I support the concept we’re all equal; however don’t like the ACT solution but think it’s all pointless anyway and a show as it’s already a dead bill.